The Syrian Job: Uncovering the Oil Industry's Radioactive Secret

picture-27344-1558471761.jpg
on

Cancerous lesions have developed across Keith MacDonaldโ€™s body and his son is dead from leukemia. His life has disintegrated, and in his eyes fault lies with the third richest company on earth. It is headquartered in the Netherlands, incorporated in the United Kingdom, and is an entity (thanks to the Parliamentary Pension Fund) that every single British MP has a stake in โ€” Royal Dutchย Shell.

The story of how MacDonald got here is a tale of adventure and tragedy fit for a Hollywood thriller, only it is real. Even with many unknowns, MacDonaldโ€™s case unearths a shocking part of the worldโ€™s most powerful industry that somehow has remained hidden forย generations.

MacDonald was born on a military base in Scotland in 1951. When he was three years-old, his older brother was killed in a tragic cliff accidentโ€”the boy chased a stray footballย over the edge and fell 100-feet to his death. โ€œMy mother couldnโ€™t deal with the stress and became obsessed with my wellbeing,โ€ says MacDonald. โ€œSafety, safety, safety, all of my life. It was almost claustrophobic. I became the family rebel and leftย home.โ€


Image: Photos of Keith MacDonald and his brother and mother (left), and their gravesย (right)

His oilfield story begins in the early 1970s. MacDonald was a rock and roll roadie, setting up equipment for Santana, Elton John, and Rod Stewart โ€” โ€œI was making good money, having a ball.โ€ One autumn day in 1975, he hitched a ride to Birmingham with a friend who had an interview for a job inspecting oil and gas pipelines. The recruitment manager for British Industrial X-Ray wore a shirt and tie, looked MacDonald over and with a string of words that would change the course of his life, offered him aย job.


Like what you’re reading? Support independent journalism by donating to DeSmogย today!


Into theย action

This began a tour of work in some of the worldโ€™s most lucrative and remote oil and gas fields, the type of adventurous life that many British men who got into the business in that era can relateย to.

โ€œIt all happened so quick I couldnโ€™t believe my luck,โ€ says MacDonald. โ€œI was going from peanuts a day to ยฃ50 a day, and eventually ยฃ5,000 aย month.โ€

MacDonald started on a pipeline in Wales and by 1977 had a job inspecting pipelines as an industrial radiographer in the Libyan oilfields, surrounded by bleached Saharan sands and the hottest temperatures on the planet. A stint in Saudi Arabia followed, then a two-year job in the United Arab Emirates building gas plants where MacDonald was assistant quality assurance superintendent. He spent much of the 1990s in Nigeria, working for Chevron as a senior company representative on a barge that fabricated and upgraded oil rigs. By the late 1990s he was inย Oman.

MacDonald is โ€œcompletely reliable,โ€ one Omani supervisor wrote on a reference form, and has โ€œwide and valuable experience of the inspection and maintenance of oilfieldย equipment.โ€

On 13 March 2000, MacDonald celebrated his 49th birthday. Around the same time, he landed in Damascus, Syria, to take a job arranged by the UK oilfield service company, Gray Mackenzie. He would be working for the Al Furat Petroleum Company (AFPC) in the rich Omar oilfield of eastern Syria. It was to be an exciting job, and his first time in the vibrant heart of the Middle Eastโ€™s oil and gas country, working under one of the worldโ€™s storied bigย majors,ย Shell.

His penny-pinching days as a roadie were long gone. The constraints of his concerned mother and the cloud of his brotherโ€™s accidental death seemed long gone,ย too.

MacDonald loved his work, and there was an overwhelming sense that he had made it. โ€œYou come across people who get up in the morning and are like, โ€˜Ugh, I got to go to work,โ€™โ€ says MacDonald. โ€œThat wasnโ€™t me. I enjoyed every minute ofย it.โ€

Shell, according to the Wall Street Journal, helped build the Middle East into โ€œa petroleum powerhouseโ€. AFPC was founded in 1985, a joint venture between the state-owned General Petroleum Corporation, a subsidiary of Shell called Syria Shell Petroleum Development, and other groups. Shell gave the Syrians technology, experts, and technical expertise, according to an AFPC website. A map shows Shellโ€™s various interests in Syria, including the Omar oilfield, not far from the Iraqiย border.


Image: Screenshot of the webpage showing maps of Al Furat Petroleum Corporation’sย operations.

In 2001, the closest year to MacDonaldโ€™s time of work for which Shellโ€™s annual reports are readily available, the company produced 48,000 barrels of oil a day in Syria โ€“ at the time just over two percent of their global output. Although Shell left Syria in 2011, as civil war broke out and the European Union imposed sanctions, there is still a record of how the company co-sponsored a festival for โ€œArab Environment Day,โ€ supported a forum on women leaders, raised money for the blind, and worked with the Ministry of Education to develop lectures for school children about traffic accidents and environmental safety. โ€œWe invested more than $8 billion in Syria,โ€ Shell’s general manager for the country, Graham Henley, is quoted asย saying.ย 

By the time MacDonald got to Syria, he had worked in oil and gas fields on three continents, but he immediately noticed there was something different about the Omar field. โ€œWellheads were blocked off with barbed wire fence that prevented anyone from getting close,โ€ recalls MacDonald. โ€œThere was yellow caution tape on each side of the fence, and large signs with writing in English that read: โ€˜Radiation โ€“ Do Notย Enter.โ€™โ€

There was something else different about work in the Syrian oil fields. MacDonald had to take a 40-hour course on whatโ€™s referred to in the industry as Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials, or NORM. The topic had come up in other oilfields but this was the first time he had been forced to formally learn anything, although it wasnโ€™t much of an education. โ€œThe exam we took at the end had all the right answers already crossed in,โ€ saysย MacDonald.


Image: AFPC NORM examination with answers already filledย in.

Regardless, radioactivity was hardly on his mind in Syria. He stayed in a well-run workcamp that served a British breakfast and spent free time listening to rock music and drinking beers on the banks of the Euphrates River in the city of Deir Ez-Zor, part of a culturally-rich region that has been inhabited by humans for 11,000 years, and in more recent times was a brutal ISIS stronghold and flashpoint in the Syrianย war.

The fatefulย day

On 1 August 2000, MacDonald was called out to check the Thayyem-107 well. It would be a fatefulย job.

A driver took him in a company SUV and he arrived at the well in the late morning, with temperatures boiling and the weather dry. A piece of piping connected to the wellhead called an expansion loop was corroded and had to be replaced. As MacDonald recalls it, his boss, a Shell official named Brian Welch, told him, โ€œWe need to replace this piping fast because this well is a big producerโ€”go out there and make sure itโ€™sย done.โ€

To inspect the pipe, MacDonald had to put his hands inside the valve and run his fingers around the seal to feel for corrosion. He wore standard work boots and coveralls, but no gloves or respirator. Despite radioactivity being a known danger in Syria, he saysย he had never been informed by Shell before taking the job that the task involved contamination risks. And nobody mentioned anything about radioactive elements, which can hitch onto dust and blow about freely in theย wind.

Itโ€™s an incredibly dangerous exposure pathway, because tiny dust particles can contaminate virtually everything they touch, such as a workerโ€™s boots and clothes. They can also easily, and unknowingly, be breathed into the body or ingested when someone licks their dust-coated lips. That day at Thayyem-107 โ€œwas so damn hot and dry,โ€ remembers MacDonald. โ€œThe valve was caked in dust, and I had my bare hands in the dust. Dust was in the air, and dust got all over myย body.โ€

The valve was indeed corroded and would have to be replaced, but there wasnโ€™t a replacement onsite. MacDonald ordered a safety test that would check the pipeโ€™s strength, then walked off to smoke a cigarette. He had been at the wellhead for 45 minutes. It was now near noon and blazing hot. He stepped inside a little cabin that served as an office to make a cup of coffee and wait for the safety test. A paper on the desk caught his eye: โ€œAl Furat Petroleum Company Radiological Survey and NORM Precautionย Report.โ€

It revealed that at 8:09 that morning a radioactivity inspection had been conducted at the Thayyem-107 well and the numbers were off the charts. In fact, the report stated that in order to do work on the site, rubber gloves, rubber boots, goggles, an impervious coverall and air supplied respiratory equipment were all needed. Plus, the area was to be protected by warning signs and workers were, โ€œto be checked for contamination before leaving [the] radiological area.โ€ None of these protocols had beenย followed.


Image: NORM precaution report showing the types of protective equipment necessary at the site Keith MacDonaldย worked.

One way to measure the amount of radioactivity being given by a surface or object is with a scientific unit called Counts Per Second, or CPS. According to the reportย MacDonald found, the background level of radioactivity at the site was fourย CPS. The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission says an area is considered a โ€œhot zoneโ€ at fiveย CPS. Yet, the report MacDonald had found indicated readings at the wellhead for beta particles, a type of radioactivity that can pass through skin and cause genetic mutations and cellular damage that leads to cancer, of 6,336 CPS, an astonishing 1,584 times backgroundย levels.

โ€œItโ€™s a pretty darn big exposure,โ€ says Dr. Marco Kaltofen, a US nuclear forensics scientist at Worcester Polytechnic Institute with two decades of experience examining radioactivity around the world. (Kaltofen has testified as an expert witness on radioactivity in numerous legal cases and before the US Environmental Protection Agency;ย DeSmog passed him the report MacDonald hadย found).

โ€œThis worker certainly has a potentially large internal exposure from ingestion or inhalation or both,โ€ Kaltofen added, โ€œunder normal circumstances this type of exposure should have generated a nasal swab and urine or fecal test of the worker.โ€ MacDonald received no suchย thing.

He dashed back into the heat, horrified over the harm he had so quickly and silently bestowed upon his body, furious that he was not informed by his seemingly trustworthy superiors, and completely unaware of the depths of the rabbit hole he had just stumbledย down.

โ€œI asked the Syrian workers if they knew there was radiation there and they looked at me like I had just landed from Mars,โ€ says MacDonald. He had the impression that โ€œit was obvious they were being kept in theย dark.โ€

MacDonald and the Syrian workers at the site were not the only ones. To this day, much of the world remains in the dark on the topic of oil and gas radioactivity, and nowhere is the lack of knowledge so stark as with the industryโ€™s own workers, who are regularly lulled into a false sense ofย security.

Regulatory agencies, weakened in countries like the UK and US by defunding and deregulatory efforts, are unable to ensure safety standards are effectively met. A lack of attention from the media and medical community mean stories go untold. And oil and gas operators generally fail to fully inform their workers of the risks, despite knowing they exist. That combination of factors means MacDonaldโ€™s story is just the tip of theย iceberg.

The industry hasย known

Nearly everyone on earth uses oil and gas products. But most people are completely unaware that oil and gas production brings large amounts of radioactivity to theย surface.

The first scientific record comes from a 1904 paper by a University of Toronto researcher who examined crude oil from a well in a farmerโ€™s field in southern Ontario. He discovered a radioactive gas we now know to be radon, which is currently pegged by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as the second leading cause of lung cancer in the United States. Radon is just one of many radioactive elements oil and gas brings to the surface. โ€œThe presence of these naturally occurring radionuclides in petroleum reservoirs,โ€ states a 1991 EPA report, has actually been used, โ€œas one of the methods for finding hydrocarbons.โ€ย 

Much of the radioactivity brought to the surface in oil and gas production is part of a salty toxic stream of liquid the industry calls brine or produced water. Most oil wells produce far more brine than oil, and some wells can produce 10 times as much. Geologists have long known that the radioactive element radium, peppered throughout earthโ€™s layers and moderately soluble, flows with brine to the surface. โ€œWe have created a transit system for taking radioactivity from underground,โ€ says Kaltofen, the US nuclear forensicย scientist, โ€œbringing it up to the biosphere where it can interact with people and theย environment.โ€

Because radium accumulates in oilfield piping โ€” part of a difficult to remove deposit called โ€œscaleโ€ โ€” and sludge at the bottom of tanks, certain workers can become coated in radium-laden waste. The radioactive element can also easily be made airborneย with dust, and accidentally ingested or inhaled. The US EPA has reported that each oil well generates approximately 100 tons of scale annually, and that conventional oil production alone produces 230,000 metric tons of radioactive sludge aย year.

In the United States, because of exemptions written in 1980 by a pair of Democratic Congressmen, this hazardous waste, which according to the US EPA contains not just potentially concerning levels of radioactivity but also potentially concerning levels of carcinogens like benzene and toxic heavy metals like lead and arsenic, has been deemed โ€œnon-hazardous.โ€ This means it can be disposed of in landfills intended to hold household garbage. There is little easily accessible information available on just where the rest of the worldโ€™s massive amounts of radioactive oil and gas waste endsย up.

A 2005 report of the Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority reveals it has been standard practice in the North Sea oilfieldsย to dump toxic radium-laden brine into the ocean. While the report indicates that in most areas background levels of radium would not change, โ€œin limited areas in the northern North Sea, a doubling of the activity concentration โ€ฆ could beย encountered.โ€

Much of this radioactivity is transported towards the Norwegian coast, the report notes. โ€œTo place this into context,โ€ states a 2016 report of the International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (IOGP), co-authored by retired Shell radiation expert Gert Jonkers, the North Sea oil industryโ€™s emissions, by one measure of radioactivity, โ€œare forty times those reported by the nuclear energyย sector.โ€

While today the oil and gas industry does not talk openly about the risks radioactivity poses to their workers, they once did. โ€œThe presence of natural radioactivity in oil and gas fields has been recognised worldwide,โ€ states a 1987 document from the UK Offshore Operators Association, a leading trade association for the UKโ€™s oil and gasย industry.

Shell is aware of the issue too. The companyโ€™s own documents reveal that the oil and gas giant has known for 70 years that various exposures from oil and gas work, including exposure to radioactive materials, can lead toย cancer.

โ€œHuman contacts with soot, carbon black, pitch, asphalt, crude petroleum, shale oil, paraffin oil, lubricating and fuel oil, anthracene oil and other distillations and fractionation products of coal and petroleum apparently cause the majority of environmental cancers in man,โ€ states a 1950 report produced by a toxicologist working at Emeryville Research Center, a bygone Shell lab in California. Substances like โ€œarsenicโ€ and โ€œradio-active elementsโ€ are unique, the report notes, as they have โ€œestablished carcinogenic qualitiesโ€ for which the โ€œorigin of environmental cancerโ€ can actually โ€œbeย tracedโ€.


Image: Opening pages of the Emeryville Research Center reportย (1950).

More recent documents from Shell indicate that through the fracking boom of the 2000s, knowledge of the risks of radioactivity has not been lost. In fact, Gert Jonkers, the retired Shell radiation expert, has authored or co-authored half a dozen papers on theย topic.

โ€œThe encounter of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) is of increasing concern for the oil and gas industry, not only because of radiological safety aspects, but also from an environmental point of view,โ€ states one 1997 article, published with the American Petroleum Institute. Another paper discusses how NORM โ€œis often encountered during gas and oil productionโ€ and โ€œgives rise to increased health hazards toย personnel.โ€

The 2016 report on radioactivity that Jonkers co-authored for the International Association of Oil & Gas Producers serves as an informative field guide to these hazards. โ€œThere are two ways in which personnel can be exposed to radiation,โ€ the report states,ย โ€œirradiation from external sources and contamination from inhaled and ingestedย sources.โ€

An accompanying diagram features an oil and gas worker standing above an open pipe spewing radioactivity, a hauntingly similar version of the situation MacDonald found himself in at Thayyem-107. While radioactivity can damage the skin, breathing or ingesting dust allows the hitchhiker radioactive elements, or radionuclides, to enter our bodies, where they may lodge in the lung or gut and continue their radioactive decay, leading to the โ€œirradiation of tissues andย organs.โ€


Image: Diagram of NORM exposure from the International Association of Oil & Gas Producersย report.

But while Shell scientists may be schooled on the matter, workers like MacDonald, labouring in the companyโ€™s gritty and far-flung oil and gas fields, appear to be left to fend for themselves. And the company does not seem willing to fill in theย blanks.

โ€œWhile the risk of exposure to radioactive elements in some phases of our operations is low,โ€ Shell spokesperson Curtis Smith replied to me in early January, โ€œShell has strict, well-developed safety procedures in place to monitor for radioactivity as well as a comprehensive list of safety protocols should radioactivity beย detected.โ€

When pressed in March on the details of these safety procedures, and the commonness of a case like MacDonaldโ€™s, Smith replied, โ€œunfortunately, all of our resources are dedicated to current/fluid events related to the COVID-19 outbreak. As a result, I wonโ€™t have the time to revisit this topic with you.โ€ When pressed again in April regarding the specifics of MacDonaldโ€™s case, including a copy of the Thayyem-107 radiological report, Smith replied with the followingย statement:

โ€œSafety is a top priority in all our operations and we take seriously any allegations that our operating companies might have a negative impact on employees, contractors or local communities. However, since Shell is not the operator in Syria but a minority shareholder in Al Furat Petroleum Company (AFPC), we do not hold nor have access to any operational level data owned by AFPC which can substantiate theseย claims.โ€

Andrew Gross, a US-based Radiation Control Consultant who for years ran a business cleaning up the oil and gas industryโ€™s radioactive waste, and now works as an independent consultant, has little doubt where the buckย stops.

โ€œThese companies will pretend they are ignorant but you got to remember these are corporations, and Shell or whoever it is has one purpose in life, to maximize profits,โ€ says Gross. โ€œIf you are a worker, that is something important to understand,โ€ he adds. โ€œThese guys need to know that they have to take care ofย themselves.โ€

Regulatoryย failures

MacDonald has been trying to get someone to take his story seriously for 20ย years.

One of many legal firms he contacted was Thompsons Solicitors, headquartered in London. A June 2018 letter from attorney Stephen Ireland conveys an acknowledgment of the situation MacDonald encountered at Thayyem-107. โ€œYou believe that as a consequence of this exposure, you have developed a psychiatric/psychological disorder and skin lesionsโ€ the letter stated. But Irelandโ€™s letter also noted that MacDonaldโ€™s legal claim was far fromย certain.

In fact, according to Drย Andrew Watterson, an occupational and environmental health researcher at the University of Stirling in Scotland, it is exceptionally difficult to get compensation. โ€œThe governmentโ€™s workplace compensation scheme is an unholy mess,โ€ he states in a 2015 article he co-wrote for Hazards Magazine. For workers to receive compensation they must usually show their illness is twice as likely to occur in their profession as compared to the general population. This is an โ€œall-or-usually-nothing conservative epidemiology,โ€ writes Watterson, โ€œdesigned to give as many victims as possible a big fatย zero.โ€

Watterson said he was not aware of a single worker case on oilfield radioactivity being brought before courts in the UK. There is a โ€œlack of awarenessโ€ on the issue, he says, which means there are no detailed scientific studies and no case law to build from. But the primary problem in his opinion lies with โ€œtoothlessโ€ health and safety regulators. โ€œIn the UK, we have a vicious circle on occupational cancers,โ€ says Watterson. โ€œDonโ€™t look, donโ€™t find, noย problem.โ€


Read more โ€“ DeSmogย Special Seriesย โ€“ย Louisianaโ€™s Cancer Alley Communities atย Risk


When DeSmog asked the Health and Safety Executive, the UK agency responsible for regulation and enforcement of workplace health and safety, if it had ever assessed oil and gas worker cancers to determine whether or not a link could be drawn to occupational radioactivity exposures, an HSE spokesperson told DeSmog: โ€œThere have been numerous epidemiological studies into radiation exposure within the UK over the last 70 years but as far as I am aware there is nothing at present within the UK oil and gasย [industry].โ€

Other aspects of HSEโ€™s radioactivity policy convey that for the oil and gas industry, regulations largely rely not on government regulators, but self-enforcement. In the agencyโ€™s 176-pageย Approved Code of Practice and Guidance for Work With Ionising Radiation, there is just one fleeting reference to the oil and gas industry. An HSE document entitled Offshore Radiation Essentials states to the industry: โ€œFollowing the guidance is not compulsory and you are free to take other action.โ€ HSE told DeSmog, โ€œthe protection of workers is the responsibility of theย companies.โ€

Part of the problem is a trend in countries such as the US and UK toward deregulation, and the weakening of environmental laws and the regulatory agencies that enforce them. In recent decades, the the Conservative-led governments haveย cut funding for the Health and Safety Executive, and the previous Labour government neglected its funding. โ€œThere is an ideological commitment to cutting red tape, then there is the practical act of cutting staff and regulators,โ€ explains Watterson. โ€œIt goes back to [Conservative Prime Minister Margaret] Thatcher, she wanted to see softer regulation in the UK, and that was picked up by [Labour Prime Ministers] Blair andย Brown.โ€

There is a sign of hope for workers like MacDonald. A court case settled in 2016 in the state of Louisiana, in the heart of Americaโ€™s conventional oil and gas patch, reveals that dozens of workers working a variety of common industry jobs such as roughneck, roustabout, pipe cleaner and truck driver developedย cancer.

A report written by radiation experts uses an analysis program created by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to link these workerโ€™s cancers to radioactivity exposures received on the job. Cancers the workers developed include non-Hodgkinโ€™s lymphoma, various leukemias, colon cancer and liver cancer, amongย others.

โ€œThese men are guinea pigs,โ€ says Stuart Smith, the New Orleans-based attorney who tried the cases, and was the first attorney to try oil-field radiation cases. โ€œI have litigated several cases that showed that oilfield waste caused cancer,โ€ he says. โ€œAll the big majors have known about this for many decades. The regulators are obviously aware of it too, itโ€™s just that they donโ€™t have the political cojones to do anything aboutย it.โ€

Personalย tragedy

MacDonald was furious with his superiors at Shell who had failed to inform him of the radioactivity risks at Theyyem-107. He had also been seeded with a horrible dread โ€“ that the high dose of radiation he received had forever mutated hisย body.

On the afternoon of 1 August 2000, he filed a report detailing his visit to Thayyem-107. โ€œSpecific methods for protection of personnel and the environmentโ€ฆwere not applied,โ€ it stated. He tried to get colleagues to listen to concerns but says he was treated like an outcast. A 7 November 2000 letter from Al Furat Petroleum Company to Gray Mackenzie, the UK-based oil service company that initially hired MacDonald for the Syria job, described him as a โ€œdisruptive influence.โ€ The letter continued, โ€œI would therefore advise you โ€ฆ to terminate this individualย immediately.โ€


Image: A letter from AFPC to Gray Mackenzieย suggesting the company terminate MacDonaldโ€™sย contract.

But AFPCโ€™s own investigation appeared to vindicate MacDonald. The underlying cause of the incident, their report stated, included the failure to follow working rules regarding NORM, a failure of communication, poor supervision, and a perceived pressure to finish the job in a hasty manner and ignore safety rules. On a scale of oneย to five, where one was slight injury and fiveย was death, the report labeled the incident a threeย โ€” โ€œMajor Injuryโ€.ย Exposure, on a scale of A to E, was D โ€” โ€œHighโ€. The report was signed by Robin Gardiner, an AFPC maintenance chief, and Brian Welch, a top Shellย inspector.

Even this admission of error did not translate to compensation MacDonald thought he deserved. Lawyers and the judicial system had failed him. He grew despondent, and had trouble sleeping. In nightmares, cancer blossomed across his body. In 2005, while working in Kula Lumpur, Malaysia, MacDonald collapsed on the side of a busy city street. At a hospital he was fitted with a pacemaker. โ€œThere was nothing wrong physically,โ€ he says โ€“ just crushingย stress.

Then there was a high point. MacDonald had met his first wife, Sara, while working in the Philippines and together they set up home in the UK and had a son, Alastair. But the marriage ended in the 1990s, largely because of his workโ€™s constant travel, says MacDonald. He wondered if he would ever have a stable familyย life.

Then, in 2006, while working for Chevron in Thailand, MacDonald met Kay. They married and moved to land owned by her parents in the countryside north of Bangkok. With his oilfield money, MacDonald built a veritable mansion: a five-bedroom house for his wife and her extendedย family.

โ€œWe had 40 acres of land and grew rice and corn, and we had chickens and pigs,โ€ says MacDonald. A son, Calum, was born in 2007. In 2009, Scott was born. โ€œI was in heaven,โ€ says MacDonald. But just as swiftly as he had built a new world for himself, itย crumbled.

In December 2010, Scott became sick. The diagnosis was Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia. For three years he was in and out of Bangkok General Hospital receiving treatments. MacDonald had a good job in Indonesia, working as construction superintendent for Saudi Aramco on a large project in the Straits of Malacca. He was making $24,000 a month and virtually all of it went to hospital bills. โ€œI spent my life savings on medical treatment for Scott,โ€ he says.ย 

A photo from October 2013 shows father and son seated together in Pattay, a resort city on the Gulf of Thailand. MacDonald has a bandage on his right arm from an operation he had just received for a subdermal tumor. Scott is in a gray T-shirt, leaning on his fatherโ€™s shoulder and smiling. He appears to be missing a tooth. They are bothย bald.

โ€œThat was the last time I saw Scott alive,โ€ says MacDonald. He had just been released and doctors said there was a 94 percent chance he would survive. But Scott relapsed, and on 29 November 2013 he died, at the age of four and a half.ย โ€œThat knocked the guts out of me,โ€ saysย MacDonald.

Then his own health took a turn. More cancerous skin lesions appeared and he returned to the UK for treatment. While physicians tended to blame his skin cancers on the sun, MacDonald remained convinced it was from his radioactivity exposure at Thayyem-107. โ€œWhilst ultraviolet light remains probably the biggest factor in developing skin cancers,โ€ wrote Sharon Blackford, a UK dermatologist who assessed his case in 2018, โ€œthe BETA particle exposure certainly could beย contributory.โ€

But by that point MacDonald had fallen down an even more shocking rabbit-hole of research. He had discovered childhood leukemia shared a potential link with a father receiving a high dose ofย radiation.

A famous study published in 1990 in BMJย โ€” formerly the British Medical Journal โ€” examined a childhood leukemia cluster in northwest England near Sellafield, a sprawling nuclear power facility. Many suspected links were examined, such as consumption of local fish and shellfish, nearness of homes to the facility, and whether or not mothers had been exposed to various viruses during pregnancy or received pre-natal abdominal x-rays. The link of statistical significance, researchers found, lay in the occupation of the sick childrenโ€™s fathers, many of whom worked at the nuclear facility and had received elevated radioactivity exposures in the months leading up to their wivesโ€™ conception. โ€œThis result,โ€ the authors concluded, โ€œsuggests an effect of ionising radiation on fathers that may be leukaemogenic in theirย offspring.โ€

The paper remains controversial. But when DeSmog put the question of whether MacDonaldโ€™s exposure in Syria could have led to his wife, eight and a half years later, giving birth to a son who would die from leukemia, Marco Kaltofen, the US nuclear forensics expert, said the question โ€œwas not crazy.โ€ While a mutated sperm would not live long, says Kaltofen, in MacDonaldโ€™s case, radioactive elements accidentally ingested and inhaled would still be inside of him, blasting off harmful radiation. In fact, radium-226, the primary isotope of concern on pipes such as the one MacDonald examined has a half-life of 1,600ย years.

Still, to firmly link Scottโ€™s death to MacDonaldโ€™s cancer, a person with a combined expertise that includes a medical physician degree and a PhD in toxicology would have to examine the case, says Kaltofen. Unfortunately, they are few and far between. An even greater impediment to the truth might be a longstanding bias among this rarefied group of experts.ย โ€œThere is a real resistance in the health physics community to teratogenic radiation effects, meaning that exposure to an individual can effect the next generation,โ€ saysย Kaltofen.โ€

Shell, however, is aware of the linkage. โ€œExposure to ionizing radiation, even at low doses, can cause damage to the nuclear (genetic) material in cells that can result in the development of radiation induced cancer many years later (somatic effects), heritable disease in future generations and some developmental effects under certain conditions,โ€ states the 2016 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers paper on oilfield radioactivity, co-authored by retired Shell radiation expert Gertย Jonkers.

Moreย cases?

MacDonald remains convinced the negligent exposure he received while working for Shell in the oilfields of Syria led to the death of his son from leukemia and his own skin cancers, whatever the courts and toxicologist say. What worries him most is that he is not alone; that he is member of a vast hidden army of oil and gas workers who have been contaminated in oilfields the world over. And many of them may have received high exposures regularly, and over a much longerย timespan.

Frances Leader, a Corfe Mullen resident who lost her husband Tony, a former North Sea oilman, to non-Hodgkinโ€™s lymphoma in 2013 remains convinced radioactivity exposure during his time on rigs in the 1970s and early 1980s was the cause. The contamination, she believes, came from the drilling fluids and produced water that spilled all over men like Tony every time pipping was pulled up on deck. Additional exposure, she suspects, came from sludge in tanks located in the base of the rig that she says Tony regularly had to clean. โ€œThey wore no breathing apparatus, no protection, no dosimeter, and there was never ever any mention of radioactivityโ€”none,โ€ saysย Leader.


Read more โ€“ DeSmogย Special Seriesย โ€“ย A Just Transition: From Fossil Fuels to Environmentalย Justice


How many UK oil and gas workers share a similar fate is unknown, because no one has ever tried to search for andย tally the cases. How many workers around the world have been harmed by radioactivity is an even greaterย mystery.

โ€œThe Syrians were basically deemed disposable,โ€ concludes MacDonald, recalling his time with Shell in the Middle East. โ€œThey were green as grass and hadnโ€™t been told anything. Guys were allowed to go into contaminated areas without any monitoring, and operators took noย precautions.โ€

MacDonald realises that not everyone has the documents and evidence that he has been able to obtain over the years. And not everyone feels confronting one of the most powerful industries on earth is their only remaining option. โ€œThe industry is terrified to expose any of this knowledge because there are too many people with billions and billions of dollars invested,โ€ he says. โ€œAt the end of the day I want to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that this is not an isolated incident, and there are other people beingย exposed.โ€

โ€œNo one giveโ€™s a shit, but I give a shit,โ€ he adds. โ€œThis is all preventable, and if my coming out can save one life, then it was all worthย it.โ€

Main images credit: Public Domain. Composite credit: Zakย Derler

picture-27344-1558471761.jpg
Justin Nobel writes on issues of science and the environment for Rolling Stone. His first book,ย PETROLEUM-238: Big Oilโ€™s Dangerous Secret and the Grassroots Fight to Stop It, tells the story of a seven-year investigation into how the U.S. oil and gas industry has avoided environmental regulations and created a dangerous and radioactive public health crisis.

Related Posts

on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.
on

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.
Analysis
on

Below-market pipeline tolls amount to an extra $18.8 billion subsidy to the oil industry, report finds.

Below-market pipeline tolls amount to an extra $18.8 billion subsidy to the oil industry, report finds.
on

FTCโ€™s latest findings bolster claims of collusion among shale producers raised in ongoing Congressional probes and major class-action lawsuits.

FTCโ€™s latest findings bolster claims of collusion among shale producers raised in ongoing Congressional probes and major class-action lawsuits.