EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

on

The Alberta premier said she met with the right-wing think tank that spearheaded Project 2025 following Donald Trumpโ€™s second win.

The Alberta premier said she met with the right-wing think tank that spearheaded Project 2025 following Donald Trumpโ€™s second win.
on

The ChatGPT creator hired John McCarrick, a gas-loving former Trump energy official, to guide how the company will source huge quantities of power for its colossal supercomputers.

The ChatGPT creator hired John McCarrick, a gas-loving former Trump energy official, to guide how the company will source huge quantities of power for its colossal supercomputers.
on

Locals face a perfect storm โ€” they canโ€™t afford insurance and climate change threatens their livelihood.

Locals face a perfect storm โ€” they canโ€™t afford insurance and climate change threatens their livelihood.
Analysis
on

Canada has a higher calling than wasting time and political capital indulging fossil fuel fever dreams.

Canada has a higher calling than wasting time and political capital indulging fossil fuel fever dreams.