DeSmog

Frederick Seitz

Frederick Seitz (Deceased)

Credentials

Background

Dr. Frederick Seitz passed away on March 2, 2008. He was the former head of Rockefeller University, a former head of the National Academy of Sciences and the principal scientific advisor to the R.J. Reynolds medical research program. He was a co-founder of the George C. Marshall Institute, and later Chairman Emeritus of the Board.2Dennis Havesi. “Frederick Seitz, 96, Dies; Physicist Who Led Skeptics of Global Warming,” The New York Times, March 6, 2008.

Seitz was the former principal scientific advisor to the RJ Reynolds medical research program. A May 2006 Vanity Fair article by Mark Hertsgaard outlines Seitz’s central role in a $45 million “medical research” program in the 1970s and 1980s for tobacco-giant RJ Reynolds:3Mark Hertsgaard. “While Washington Slept,” Vanity Fair, May, 2006.

“’They didn’t want us looking at the health effects of cigarette smoking,’ says Seitz, who is now 94— but it nevertheless served the tobacco industry’s purposes. throughout those years, the industry frequently ran ads in newspapers and magazines citing its multi-million-dollar research program as proof of its commitment to science—and arguing that the evidence on the health effects of smoking was mixed,” Hertsgaard reported in the article.

DeSmog uncovered a 1989 internal memo from tobacco company Philip Morris explaining that Seitz “is quite elderly and not sufficiently rational to offer advice”:4Richard Littlemore. “New Oregon Petition Promoter “Not Sufficiently Rational” to Advise Tobacco Industry,” DeSmog, October 12, 2007.

“I spoke with Bill Hobbs [RJ Reynolds] about arranging an appointment for you with Dr. Fred Seitz, former head of Rockerfeller University and the principal scientific advisor to the RJ Reynolds medical research program. Bill told me that Dr. Seitz is quite elderly and not sufficiently rational to offer advice.”5Richard Littlemore. “New Oregon Petition Promoter “Not Sufficiently Rational” to Advise Tobacco Industry,” DeSmog, October 12, 2007.

Stance on Climate Change

April 27, 2007

Seitz was quoted in a April 2007 interview with Frontline:

“If I was asked to bet – and this is recognizing that the answer isn’t really known scientifically – I would say it’s unlikely that we face serious danger from global warming.”6Interviews Frederick Seitz,” Frontline, April 24, 2007. Archived with WebCite, February, 2012.

Key Quotes

December 1, 2001

Seitz was quoted by the Heartland Institute’s newsletter/blog “The Heartlander”:

“[T]he scientific facts indicate that all the temperature changes observed in the last 100 years were largely natural changes and were not caused by carbon dioxide produced in human activities.”7Do people cause global warming?”, The Heartlander, December 1, 2001. Archived September 29, 2012. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/fUxPU

Tobacco Documents

There are more than 800 documents mentioning Fred Seitz in a search of the Truth Tobacco Industry Documents library.

Key Deeds

1998

Seitz was an organizer of the “Oregon Petition” along with fellow skeptic Art Robinson. The Oregon Petition has been cited by climate change deniers as proof that there is no scientific consensus, however they fail to note the controversy surrounding the petition itself.8INHOFE QUESTIONS SCIENCE BEHIND ARCTIC REPORT” (Press Release), U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works. Archived November 14, 2006. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ZtvkP 9SEPP News Release: More Than 15,000 Scientists Protest Kyoto Accord; Speak Out Against Global Warming Myth,” Science and Environmental Policy Project, April 20, 1998. Archived August 4, 2010.

In April 1998, Robinson’s Oregon Institute, along with the Exxon-backed George C. Marshall Institute, co-published the infamous “Oregon Petitionclaiming to have collected 17,000 signatories to a document arguing against the realities of global warming.10Kevin Grandia. “Exxon’s .4 million ventriloquist act,” DeSmog, September 26, 2006.

The petition and the documents included were all made to look like official papers from the prestigious National Academy of Science. They weren’t, and this attempt to mislead has been well-documented.

Along with the petition there was a cover letter from Seitz. Also attached to the petition was a “research paper” titled: Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. The paper was made to mimic what a research paper would look like in the National Academy’s prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy journal. The authors of the paper were Robinson, Sallie Baliunas, Willie Soon (both oil-backed scientists) and Robinson’s son Zachary.11Letter from Frederick Seitz,” Petition Project. Archived October 24, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/9fJHG 12Arthur B. Robinson, Noah E. Robinson, and Willie Soon. “Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide,” Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (2007) 12, 79-90. Archived .pdf on file at Desmog.

The petition was so misleading that the National Academy issued a news release stating:

“The petition project was a deliberate attempt to mislead scientists and to rally them in an attempt to undermine support for the Kyoto Protocol. The petition was not based on a review of the science of global climate change, nor were its signers experts in the field of climate science.”13700 Club anchor touted global warming skeptics’ petition reportedly signed by non-scientists, fictitious characters,” Media Transparency, February 14, 2006.

Seitz was actually the president of the National Academy of Sciences from 1962 to 1965, but after the incident regarding the Oregon Petition, the Academy tried to distance themselves from any association with Dr. Frederick Seitz.14Past NAS President Frederick Seitz Dies at 96,” National Academy of Sciences. Archived March 26, 2008. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Wc2u7

May 1995

Frederick Seitz served as an expert witness on behalf of Western Fuels Association in St. Paul, Minnesota to determine the environmental cost of coal burning by state power plants.15Ross Gelbspan. “The Heat is On:The warming of the world’s climate sparks a blaze of denial,” Harper’s Magazine, December, 1995. Archived February 25, 2016 from Dieoff.org. WebCite URL: http://www.webcitation.org/6fY6GrVJv

Witnesses provided written testimony (document id 18319 and 13820) and verbal testimony, about which Ross Gelbspan’s The Heat Is On (1995) is a key source.16Dear Dr. Haar,” Doherty Rumble & Butler, March 15, 1995. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. 17“Curriculum Vita” (PDF), March 6, 1995. Archived .pdf on file at Desmog

1995

Seitz is listed as a signatory to the Leipzig Declaration, a 1995 open letter designed and spread by SEPP in conjunction with a group called the European Academy of Environmental Affairs. The declaration stated: “there does not exist today a general scientific consensus about the importance of greenhouse warming from rising levels of carbon dioxide.”18SIGNATORIES TO THE LEIPZIG DECLARATION,” Science and Environmental Policy Project. Archived August 3, 2010.

According to SourceWatch, when a Danish journalist attempted to contact the 33 European scientists listed on the petition, 12 denied signing the petition and some had not even heard of the Leipzig Declaration. Of those that did admit to signing the letter, one was a doctor and another was an expert on flying insects. The declaration was then revised and many names were removed.

Affiliations

Publications

Seitz has published numerous papers in the area of phsyics, including the book The Modern Theory of Solids (1940), which was considered influential in solid state physics. His second volume, The Physics of Metals, was published in 1943.

A search of Google Scholar lists one peer-reviewed paper by Seitz on the subject of climate change, published in the journal Energy in 1991. The journal describes its subject areas as “energy engineering and research.”23Google Scholar search for articles by “Frederick Seitz” or “Fred Seitz.” Performed October 12, 2017. 24Robert Jastrow, William Nierenberg, and Frederick Seitz. “Global warming: What does the science tell us?Energy Vol. 16 (December 1991).

Other Resources

Resources

Related Profiles

Oregon Petition The infamous “Oregon Petition” The Oregon Petition has been used by climate change skeptics“INHOFE QUESTIONS SCIENCE BEHIND ARCTIC REPORT,” U.S. Senate Committee on...
George C. Marshall Institute (GMI) — Now CO2 Coalition Background The George C. Marshall Institute (GMI) was founded in 1984 by William Nierenberg, Frederick Seitz and Robert Jastrow as a “n...
Center for Energy and Economic Development (CEED) Background The Center for Energy and Economic Development (CEED) began in 1992 as a “partnership between the U.S. coal and rail in...
Jan L. Breslow Credentials M.D., Harvard Medical School, 1968. “Heads of Laboratories: Jan L. Breslow, M.D.,” The Rockerfeller University. Accessed January 31, 2012. M.A., Columbia Unive...