โWhat good is a philosopher who doesnโt annoy anyone?โ
This question may finally provide an answer to the riddle: What is it with Michael Crichton, anyway?
The โfather of the techno thrillerโ was the marquee speaker at The Environmental Wars โ a Science Skeptics conference during which a parade of speakers with stunning academic credentials had offered a whole dayโs worth of data proving that the debate about climate change is over.
Crichton, of course, is President George W. Bushโs favourite climate change analyst. The author of
Crichton, his 6โ10โ frame unbent before a politely skeptical audience, took the podium Saturday night and immediately began castigating all assembled for their lack of skepticism. On a defensive tangent, he ran through the history of eugenics in the United States, talking about how many Americans were sterilized between 1920 and 1964 and condemning Californiaโs scientific community for not standing up against this outrage.
He then concluded by saying โif it happened once, it can happen again.โ
The implication, clearly, was that the assembled skeptics should be ashamed of themselves, and should not dare challenge his right to say patently unreasonable things about the state of climate science.
(One of the skeptics in attendance, a scientist clearly shy of his 40th birthday, later asked forgiveness for not having spoken out against forced sterilization โ and also for failing to take actionย against the Spanish Inquisition.)
In the face of a polite question as to whether even the most skeptical observer might have to finally agree when a point of science is well proven, Crichton said:
โThere is always a debate. And to say there is not debate ought to be a danger sign. It means that the people who disagree have been shouted down.โ
Alas, no luck. Crichton went on at a self-satisfied length, quoting Diogenes (who originally asked the question about a philosopher who does not annoy) and dismissing those who accept the climate change consensus as idealogues. โNow the Archbishop of Canterbury is talking about it; now the Council of Christians is talking about it, I have nothing more to say about climate change. Now itโs a spiritual issue, I donโt want to talk about it.โ
Annoying? Yes. Credible? No, not against the serious scientists who had come before. Entertaining? Quite.
And perhaps thatโs even closer to the explanation of Crichtonโs current role: he is a professional jester. He is George Bushโs fool.
ย
Following lightly on Crichtonโs heals was ABCโs favourite libertarian, 20/20 host John Stossel.
Stossel was even more entertaining, and considerably more forthright than Crichton, criticizing his media brethren as alarmists and saps, easily led into outrageous stories by trial lawyers who are out to make a buck. Scare stories sell, Stossel said, offering myriad examples of famous American media outrages that turned out to be overblown. (Who knew that
โGlobal warming,โ Stossel said, โis a project for people who want to control other peopleโs lifestyles.โ Itโs a dirty plot to make Americans give up big cars and to check industrial development. โAnd the press is hysterical and unable to sort this out.โ
Can you imagine?
It was heartening, after listening to this dim view of people who only moments before had seemed highly enlightened to hear Stosselโs prescription for improving the quality of the public discussion. He said:
โI think blogs are our best hope.โ
Hear, hear. ย ย
ย
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts