Scientific American Slams the Wall Street Journal

authordefault
on

Scientific American just published a somewhat scathing attack on the Wall Street Journal, accusing their editorial board of

hurling editorials of stunning misdirection at their readers, continuing their irresponsible drumbeat that global warming is junk science.

The DeSmogBlog would like to applaud them for their stern telling off of the paper. We couldn’t have done it better ourselves:

The Wall Street Journal editorial page has for years railed against these scientific findings on climate change, even as the global consensus has reached nearly 100 percent of the scientific community.

Amen!

Related Posts

on

Companyโ€™s โ€œfaith and philosophy partnershipsโ€ lead sought โ€œmoral voicesโ€ for future AI models at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference.

Companyโ€™s โ€œfaith and philosophy partnershipsโ€ lead sought โ€œmoral voicesโ€ for future AI models at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference.
on

The conference has played host to Nigel Farage, Kemi Badenoch, and an array of MAGA figures this week.

The conference has played host to Nigel Farage, Kemi Badenoch, and an array of MAGA figures this week.
on

Chris Wright, a former oil and gas executive, urged the UK to embrace fossil fuels at right-wing Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference in London.

Chris Wright, a former oil and gas executive, urged the UK to embrace fossil fuels at right-wing Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference in London.
on

The addition of the Canadian Natural Resources Limited director expands fossil fuel representation on the board overseeing nearly $800 billion in retirement savings, as CPPIB faces scrutiny over its climate strategy.

The addition of the Canadian Natural Resources Limited director expands fossil fuel representation on the board overseeing nearly $800 billion in retirement savings, as CPPIB faces scrutiny over its climate strategy.