Bush tries new spin on global warming, but retains bias for growth over emission controls

authordefault
on

To many, the Bush Administration has been scrambling to appear more sensitive lately to perceptions the U.S. government either doesnโ€™t take global warming seriously โ€” or doesnโ€™t take it seriouslyย enough.

During the current U.S.-sponsored conference on climate change, for example, the president urged the worldโ€™s worst polluters, including the United States, to set goals for curbing emissions. He also proposed creation of an international fund to finance research into clean-energyย technology.

The conference was attended by 16 countries responsible for more than 80 per cent of global carbon emissions. Officials from Australia, Britain, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Russia and South Africa were attending, as well as European Union and UN climate-changeย officials.

Rather than seize the opportunity by calling for binding controls, Bush suggested each nation should decide for itself how far it wanted to go โ€“ without stunting economic growth, ofย course.

In a last-gasp effort at damage control, the White House circulated a pocket-size handbook aimed at dispelling various โ€œmythsโ€ about U.S. environmental policy. But trying to dispel widely held notions is a far cry from taking action on globalย warming.

The U.S. alone spews up to one-quarter of the worldโ€™s total annual output of carbon emissions. China is the worldโ€™s largest nation in terms of both population and pollution. India is set to overtake China. Both were on hand when Bush took the podium to reiterate his tiresome call for voluntaryย action.

Another opportunity lost to histrionics and politicalย posturing.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Regulators have clearly demonstrated they are prioritizing continued oil production over public safety.

Regulators have clearly demonstrated they are prioritizing continued oil production over public safety.
Opinion
on

It's time to prepare for the 'Chaoscene.'

It's time to prepare for the 'Chaoscene.'
on

The pro-Trump Heartland Institute claims it spearheaded opposition to a flagship European nature law.

The pro-Trump Heartland Institute claims it spearheaded opposition to a flagship European nature law.
Analysis
on

Politicians, donors, think tanks, and media outlets in the UK and U.S. are working increasingly closely to scupper climate policies and promote fossil fuel extraction.

Politicians, donors, think tanks, and media outlets in the UK and U.S. are working increasingly closely to scupper climate policies and promote fossil fuel extraction.