It's climate that changes, but weather that kills you

authordefault
on

There is no proof whatever that the devastating strength of cyclone Nargis is related to climate change. There is no concrete evidence that the deadliest tornado season in a decade can be linked to globalย warming.

There is a smoking gun, and it has human fingerprints all over it. The case against the fossil-fuel-burning culprits has certainly been proved beyond reasonable doubt, but because the worst offenders are rich and influential, there is still no one up onย charges.

This is, of course, an invitation to those who want to argue about whether it is appropriate to โ€œscream climate changeโ€ every time there is a critical weather event. And I admit that when these people get excited about a chilly winter or the odd cold day in May, we’re the first to ridicule their inability to distinguish between climate andย weather.

But these storms – these deadly storms – are precisely what climate modellers have told us we can expect in a warming planet. People are dying in horrifying numbers. (And it’s interesting in Myanmar, as in the U.S. after Katrina, that government neglect and ineptitude may prove to be the deadliest component ofย all.)

The quibblers at the Heartland Institute, and at dozens of other think tank clones, would have us cling to doubt and do nothing. But then, Heartland President Joseph Bast doesn’t actually live in the heartland. He doesn’t have to deal with the risks of Tornado Alley and he surely doesn’t have to trouble himself with the fate of sea-level communities fronting on the Bay ofย Bengal.

Flitting between Chicago, New York and Washington, D.C., Joe Bast can continue to profit from defending tobacco and oil companies without ever worrying personally that his casual risk analysis is exposing huge portions of the world’s population – and all the generations to come – to an environmental catastrophe that arrived with a huge and explicit warningย sign.

So, look – if you can – at the photos of dead bodies floating down the Irriwaddy River. Cling – if you can – to the idea that his event had nothing whatever to do with the world’s changing climate – with decisions that we have all made and actions that we all might haveย changed.

Seriously, 90+ per cent is not proof. So, pour yourself another sherry and light another cigar. We’ll call you when we know, for sure, that the party isย over.

Please take a moment and vote for Richard’s post on Digg.com by clickingย here.

Related Posts

on

For years, United, American, and other airlines have led massive lobbying efforts against regulations to prevent climate change.

For years, United, American, and other airlines have led massive lobbying efforts against regulations to prevent climate change.

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.
on

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.
on

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.