EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

The Reform UK leaderโ€™s planned trip to Washington D.C. has prompted fresh consternation from campaigners.

The Reform UK leaderโ€™s planned trip to Washington D.C. has prompted fresh consternation from campaigners.
Series: MAGA
Opinion
on

Policymakers, civil society, investors, business, and the media all must answer key questions fast โ€” before the regulatory rollback turns into a rout.

Policymakers, civil society, investors, business, and the media all must answer key questions fast โ€” before the regulatory rollback turns into a rout.
on

The Alberta gas giant Capital Power lobbied the government 37 times in the lead-up to an accord suspending clean energy regulations, federal records show.

The Alberta gas giant Capital Power lobbied the government 37 times in the lead-up to an accord suspending clean energy regulations, federal records show.
on

Justice Samuel Alito did not recuse himself from considering the petition, despite significant financial conflicts of interest in implicated cases.

Justice Samuel Alito did not recuse himself from considering the petition, despite significant financial conflicts of interest in implicated cases.