EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
onDec 19, 2008 @ 16:56 PST

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

onJan 13, 2026 @ 06:01 PST

The people behind the reports are tied to the fossil fuel industry and climate science denial groups.

The people behind the reports are tied to the fossil fuel industry and climate science denial groups.
onJan 12, 2026 @ 06:01 PST

Singerโ€™s foundation gave $100,000 to the expertโ€™s think tank, the Hudson Institute, according to 2024 tax records.

Singerโ€™s foundation gave $100,000 to the expertโ€™s think tank, the Hudson Institute, according to 2024 tax records.
onJan 9, 2026 @ 03:08 PST

Key members of Nigel Farageโ€™s pro-oil party have been forging financial ties to the UAE.

Key members of Nigel Farageโ€™s pro-oil party have been forging financial ties to the UAE.
onJan 7, 2026 @ 03:00 PST

The leader of Reform, a pro-oil party, received lavish hospitality from Abu Dhabi.

The leader of Reform, a pro-oil party, received lavish hospitality from Abu Dhabi.