EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board has invested billions in fossil fuel expansion in the United States since Trumpโ€™s return to office.

The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board has invested billions in fossil fuel expansion in the United States since Trumpโ€™s return to office.
on

The European far-right rubbed shoulders with pro-Trump groups in Brussels.

The European far-right rubbed shoulders with pro-Trump groups in Brussels.
Series: MAGA
on

Science journalist Adam Becker speaks with DeSmog about how Silicon Valley tech billionaires have invented new forms of greenwashing and climate denial in their quest for ever-more fantastic technology.

Science journalist Adam Becker speaks with DeSmog about how Silicon Valley tech billionaires have invented new forms of greenwashing and climate denial in their quest for ever-more fantastic technology.
Analysis
on

It turns out oil and gas arenโ€™t Albertaโ€™s only hazardous exports.

It turns out oil and gas arenโ€™t Albertaโ€™s only hazardous exports.