Conservatives Launch All-Out War on Obama's Green Policies

authordefault
on

For all the florid talk of bipartisanship, Congress has precious little to show for its efforts. It has only been a little over a week since President Obama was inaugurated, and, despite promising to work hand in hand with the new administration and Democratic majorities, the GOP and its ideological allies are already back to their old obstructionistย ways.

Case in point: the much ballyhooed $825 billion stimulus package โ€“ i.e. the American Recovery and Reinvestment Bill of 2009 โ€“ that the president has made a top priority.

The massive bill, which contains goodies for practically every sector of the ailing economy, has been the subject of withering criticism by Senate and House Republicans alike, who object to many of its key provisions, including funding for healthcare programs (see: the whining about the โ€œhundreds of millionsโ€ spent on โ€œcontraceptivesโ€) and public infrastructure projects. (Their plan, not surprisingly, is all about tax cuts.)

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and his counterpart in the House, John Boehner, have been on the attack, peddling lies and distortions about the billโ€™s contents to whoever is willing to listen, with the latter explicitly urging his colleagues to vote againstย it.

Last week, the right-wing commentariat went into a tizzy over reports of an unofficial analysis of the stimulus package released by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) that showed that a large portion of the funds would not be disbursed until well after 2010. The Wall Street Journal and other reliable bastions of the conservative press exulted in the report, deriding the Democratsโ€™ plan as a โ€œlegislative freight trainโ€ and a foil for Obamaโ€™s wasteful, politically-motivated spendingย agenda.

The only problem is that said CBO report doesnโ€™t actually exist. As a CBO aide explained to The Huffington Postโ€™s Ryan Grim: โ€œWe did not issue any report, any analysis or any study.โ€ What the right-wing latched onto in masse was only an unofficial analysis of a small portion of the package, as Grimย explains:

โ€œRather, the nonpartisan CBO ran a small portion of an earlier version of the stimulus plan through a computer program that uses a standard formula to determine a score โ€“ how quickly money will be spent. The score only dealt with the part of the stimulus headed for the Appropriations Committee and left out the parts bound for the Ways and Means or Energy and Commerce Committee. Because it dealt with just a part of the stimulus, it estimated the spending rate for only about $300 billion of the $825 billion plan. Significant changes have been made to the part of the bill the CBO lookedย at.โ€

Indeed, the actual analysis, which was released yesterday (and which you can read on the directorโ€™s blog), found that the bill would inject approximately $526 billion, or 65 percent of the total, in new spending into the economy by the end of September 2010 and have a โ€œnoticeable impact on economic growth andย employment.โ€

It did note, however, that spending on infrastructure and clean technology projects would take longer to flow into the economy โ€“ around 40 percent of the $356 billion dedicated to the projects would be spent by 2010. (As the Center for American Progressโ€™ Scott Lilly explains, though, CBO analyses tend to be on the conservative side, so it is very possible that the spending could come into play a lotย sooner.)

Another point of contention has been the presidentโ€™s decision to allow California and other states to set their own auto-emissions standards following years of inaction by the Bush administration. Senator James Inhofe, who always seems to have the right words for the right occasion, called Obamaโ€™s action โ€œenvironmental thuggery,โ€ warning that it would cost more jobs in the already beleaguered car industry. The Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), for its part, loudly proclaimed that the presidentโ€™s move would โ€œwreck the economy and the auto industry.โ€ Hereโ€™s what Sam Kazman, the organizationโ€™s general counsel, had to say about the updated CAFร‰ย standards:

โ€œFederal fuel economy standards are already a huge hidden burden on the industry, and the President is now proposing that make that burden even heavier.ย  Congress is spending billions to bail out the auto industry, and hereโ€™s the President coming up with new ways to sinkย it.โ€

That would explain why companies like Toyota and Honda, which have been making more fuel-efficient vehicles for years, have been doing soย poorly.

Lastly, though his administration likely wonโ€™t act on it for the next few months at least, expect conservative opposition to deepen when Obama finally unveils his cap-and-trade legislation. As it did with the Lieberman-Warner bill, the conservative movement will do everything in its power to kill any new attempt to regulate unfettered carbon dioxide emissions. It wonโ€™t be pretty, and I hope the president and his supporters are up to theย task.

It certainly wouldnโ€™t hurt for him to cite โ€œPathways to A Low Carbon Economy,โ€ a major new report published by McKinsey, which describes the cost of rapidly reducing greenhouse gas emissions over the next decade โ€œmanageableโ€ โ€“ less than 1 percent of world GDP by 2030 โ€“ and urges quick action. โ€œThe window for an effective response to climate change is relatively narrow โ€“ explicitly, the next five to 10 years,โ€ the reportย states.

I know President Obama made transcending partisanship a central theme of his campaign, but sometimes thereโ€™s just no negotiating with theseย people.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Oil patch advocate Lisa Baiton called for more extraction and less regulation at Vancouver address that didnโ€™t once mention climate change.

Oil patch advocate Lisa Baiton called for more extraction and less regulation at Vancouver address that didnโ€™t once mention climate change.
on

PA-based CEO Toby Rice hobnobbed with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Now heโ€™s poised for pipelines, exports, and profits.

PA-based CEO Toby Rice hobnobbed with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Now heโ€™s poised for pipelines, exports, and profits.
on

Longtime DeSmog reporter and author of The Petroleum Papers will play a key leadership role as we investigate a global resurgence of climate obstruction.

Longtime DeSmog reporter and author of The Petroleum Papers will play a key leadership role as we investigate a global resurgence of climate obstruction.
on

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.