Pachauri: Email theft a "recreational distraction"

authordefault
on

The theft and release of the University of East Anglia emails is nothing more than a โ€œrecreational distractionโ€ to the Copenhagen climate summit, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Chair Dr. Rajendra Pachauri said at a news conferenceย today.

Yet immediately after he said it, another senior IPCC member said he believed that his colleagues have, from the very beginning, underestimated the potential effect of the email story on public understanding of climate science – and public support for action inย Copenhagen.

Pachauri (or โ€œPachy,โ€ as he seems to be knownย  among his friends) had called a news conference on the โ€œScientific Basisโ€ for climate change. It wound up being a review of the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, a reiteration of news that โ€œthe warming of the climate system isย unequivocal.โ€

The question (which I posed and which Pachauri did not answer) was whether the UNFCCC or the IPCC would have felt such a conference was necessary had the emails not been used so effectively to call the science into question.

Pachauri rose specifically and forcefully to the defence of the IPCC. He and his co-presenters described the process of review thre number of scientists, the range of different sources and the extent of the review. The IPCC fielded and either incorporated or responded to 20,000 reviewer comments, after which the entire Summary for Policy Makers was subjected to word-by-word review and acceptance by all the governments that are party to the convention – including such would-be denier nations as Saudiย Arabia.

โ€œTo devise an ogranization today to come up with something to meet the needs of the world, you would invent something that is clearly identical to what the IPCC is,โ€ Pachauriย concluded.

Yet the emails have been used effectively and repeatedly to undermine public confidence, and that effort is likely to redouble, especially if those assembled here in Copenhagen actually come to an agreement. The Senate Republican letter demanding an independent investigation, for example, must be considered as a shot across the bow. The Senate minority wonโ€™t just quibble about any concessions that President Barack Obama makes here this week, they will deny the necessity to have even attended the conference. (Another bow shot: Sarah Palin says Barack Obama should boycott Copenhagen climate talks).

So, regardless of how sincerely Pachauri has said that the science is sound and the opportunity for denial over, the argument – the email-fueled argument – is just starting to heatย up.

Related Posts

on

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.
Opinion
on

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.
on

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.
on

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€