COP16 Climate Talks: U.S. Position May See it Leave Cancun Early

authordefault
on

It has not taken long for the United Statesโ€™ diplomatic team to establish the countryโ€™s hard-nosed negotiating position at the United Nations climate conference in Cancun, Mexico (COP16).ย  The nationโ€™s stance is so firm, it might lead the delegation to abandon the proceedingsย early.

In the first day of the negotiations, the United States made it clear that it would only sign on to a โ€œbalanced packageโ€ that requires certain criteria beingย satisfied.ย 

According the UKโ€™s The Guardian newspaper this criteria includes: developing nations committing to emissions cuts and the establishment of a verifiable system of accounting for these cuts.ย  If these features were included in a treaty, the United States would agree to the provisions that are important to emerging economies such as climate finance, technology sharing, andย deforestation.

In a briefing with journalists, Todd Stern, the U.S.โ€™s chief climate envoy, said, โ€œWeโ€™re either going to see progress across the range of issues or weโ€™re not going to see much progress.ย  Weโ€™re not going to race forward on three issues and a take a first step on other important ones.ย  Weโ€™re going to have to get them all moving at a similar pace.โ€

The Chinese, however, have no desire to either establish a cap on emissions or an accounting system to monitor these emissions.ย  The Chinese feel this will hinder their economic development, and is unfair on severalย levels.ย 

China says nations like the United States have became economic juggernauts as result of the use of cheap fossil fuels; additionally, these economies have consumed high-emitting energy sources for years, and have, therefore, contributed the most to anthropogenic globalย warming.

These two powerhouse nations clashed over this issue last year at Copenhagen.ย  It took a last ditch effort of diplomacy from U.S. President Barack Obama to establish the limited Copenhagen Accord.ย  However, the United States and the Obama administration have lost a large amount of international clout with the failure to pass new energy policy.ย  And, many wonder if the current policies will allow the U.S. to meet the modest target it agreed to in Copenhagen of cutting its emissions 17% below 2005 levels.

Michael Levi, an energy and environment fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations says he would not be surprised if Americaโ€™s demands are not met: โ€œThere are decent odds the United States will be presented with a final package that takes action on all sorts of things that developing countries want but doesnโ€™t have any clear wins for Washington.ย  I wouldnโ€™t be surprised to see the US reject such an outcome, even if it means walking away with nothing and being attacked forย that.โ€

There are still roughly two weeks of negotiations left but the already deflated Cancun talks appear headed down a familiar path โ€“ either replicating last yearโ€™s negotiations, or establishing an accord that does not have the support of the worldโ€™s largestย power.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

on

DCI Groupโ€™s 2024 clients include the American Petroleum Institute, which has a history of undermining the scientific consensus on climate change.

DCI Groupโ€™s 2024 clients include the American Petroleum Institute, which has a history of undermining the scientific consensus on climate change.
on

The Reform UK leader baselessly suggested that farms were being cleared to make way for immigrants.

The Reform UK leader baselessly suggested that farms were being cleared to make way for immigrants.
on

The AER significantly underreports the number and scale of spills, says researcher Kevin Timoney.

The AER significantly underreports the number and scale of spills, says researcher Kevin Timoney.
Analysis
on

Poilievre has clearly not earned enough respect from the Trump administration to credibly defend Canadaโ€™s interests.

Poilievre has clearly not earned enough respect from the Trump administration to credibly defend Canadaโ€™s interests.