Exclusive: Climate Change Philosopher A Target Of Abusive Hate Campaign

authordefault
on

โ€œDIE you maggot,โ€ reads one of the hundreds of emails from climate science deniers that have dropped into philosopher Lawrence Torcelloโ€™s inbox in recentย days.

โ€œFortunately, your kind will be marched to the wall with all the other leftist detritus,โ€ saysย another.

Others accuse Torcello, an assistant professor at Rochester Institute of Technologyโ€™s Department of Philosophy in the west of New York State, of being a fascist, Stalinist and aย Nazi.

The catalyst for the bilious outpouring was an article Torcello had written for The Conversation website arguing there was โ€œgood reason to considerโ€ that โ€œthe funding of climate denialโ€ was morally and criminallyย negligent.

โ€œI knew there would be debate in the comment section, which I was welcoming,โ€ Torcello told me, adding he also knew the โ€œusual climate denialist blogsโ€ wouldnโ€™t like it tooย much.

โ€œBut I didnโ€™t expect the wide level of exposure that the misrepresentations would get in the press and I didnโ€™t expect the intense storm of hate mail and Twitter harassment the articleย experienced.โ€

At one point, he says he picked up his phone to be told that soon he would be โ€œpaid a visitโ€.ย One email told Torcello โ€” in customary all-caps angriness โ€” that he was a โ€œFAGGOTโ€ and that global warming was โ€œA LIE STRAIGHT FROM THE JEWSโ€.

โ€œWhen I include phone calls and twitter harassment in addition to the emails Iโ€™ve received, then somewhere above 700 items of correspondence seems like a good estimate,โ€ saysย Torcello.

โ€œI did stop keeping count after the first few days of constant bombardment, but over a week later mail is stillย coming.โ€

Onlineย misrepresentations

More accurately, it seems the catalyst for the hate campaign was not so much the article itself but the way it was misrepresented in conservativeย media.

Climate science denialist James Delingpole, now writing for the conservative activist website Breitbart, managed to twice misrepresent Torcelloโ€™s article in his very firstย sentence.ย 

Under the headline โ€œUS Philosophy Professor: Jail ‘Denialist’ Climate Scientists For Criminal Negligenceโ€œย Delingpole wrote Torcello had argued โ€œscientists who don’t believe in catastrophic man-made global warming should be put inย prisonโ€.

โ€œThis was a blatant misrepresentation of my article,โ€ says Torcello, whose article did not mention climate โ€œscientistsโ€ or say that anyone should be put in the โ€œslammerโ€, as Delingpole had claimed.ย Torcelloย says:

One crucial aspect of the scientific process is that ideas are tested against rigourous skepticism. Scientists who challenge conventional understandings of climate change in the course of their research are doing exactly what scientists are supposed toย do.

Despite Delingpoleโ€™s misrepresentation, things soon got worse.ย The Daily Callerโ€™s Education Editor Eric Owens wrote that Torcello โ€œwants to send people who disagree with him about global warming toย jail.โ€

Owens, whose story was reposted by FoxNation, also thought the chilly 18F temperature in Rochester on the day Torcelloโ€™s story was published was in some wayย relevant.

Conspiracy-friendly Infowars.com went a step further, claiming that Torcello had โ€œcalled for the incarceration of any American who actively disagrees that climate change is solely caused by human activity.โ€ย Traffic-heavy The Drudge Report reposted the Infowars.comย story.

Promotingย complaints

Lord Christopher Monckton wrote to the provost at Torcelloโ€™s college to encourage them to consider if he was a โ€œfit and proper person to hold any academic post at theย Instituteโ€.

Lord Moncktonโ€™s outburst seems particularly ironic, given that he once told a partisan Australian crowd of climate sceptics: โ€œSo to the bogus scientists who have produced the bogus science that invented this bogus scare I say, we are coming after you. We are going to prosecute you, and we are going to lock youย up.โ€

Climate science denialist blogger Anthony Watts promoted Monckton’s letter and provided his readers with the email addresses of senior university personnel and encouraged complaints.ย In another post, Watts gave links to Torcelloโ€™s academic home page containing his emailย address.

โ€œIf you choose to lodge a complaint, be sure to be courteous and factual, we donโ€™t need to surrender the moral high ground to anger,โ€ wroteย Watts.

Despite this apparent plea for civility, several comments were allowed to stand on Wattsโ€™ blog making references to Torcelloโ€™s looks and calling him various names including โ€œbozoโ€, โ€œidiotโ€ and โ€œcrazy lunaticโ€.ย One commenter suggested that someone should โ€œput [Torcelloโ€™s] ass inย prisonโ€.

Torcelloย says:

Perhaps this sounds naรฏve in retrospect, but I expected that anyone who had a response to the article I wrote would have read it.ย One thing that almost all of the calls and emails I know of shared in common was a lack of having read myย article.

Now it is clear that the bloggers misrepresenting my views knew exactly what they were doing with the scandalous headlines and crafted misquotations.ย Even when they linked to my article, they felt secure in the judgement that their audience wouldnโ€™t readย it.

Support among theย hate

Torcello did receive some supportive emails sent to his bosses.ย One came from philosopher Brian Leiter, a professor at the University of Chicago and founder of its Center for Law, Philosophy and Human Values.ย Leiterย said:

This kind of organized harassment of faculty by the far right happens too often, and universities should be encouraged to take a stronger stand against this malevolentย behavior.

The Rochester Institute of Technology president Bill Destler released a statement saying Torcello had โ€œa right to free speechโ€ and that universities and colleges should be forums for the discussion of โ€œcontroversialย issuesโ€.

Another hateย campaign

But the treatment meted out to Torcello is just the latest in a long list of attacks on climate scientists and other academics that accept the risk of human-caused climate change and speak publicly on theย issue.

Scientists in Australia have similar experiences with bursts of threatening hate mail, not forgetting the hacking of email accounts, regular public vilification by mostly conservative commentators and steady streams of Freedom of Information requests asking for correspondence, raw data or workingย documents.

Most recently, the journal Frontiers in Psychology withdrew one climate change paper after contrarians made a string of complaints and claimed the research was defamatory towards them.ย The journal said it had withdrawn the paper even after a โ€œdetailed investigationโ€ had found no academic or ethical issues with theย study.

Torcello told me his experience had taught him a โ€œvitally importantย lessonโ€.

Those of us who write on climate change need to be prepared for just this sort of harassment. Our universities and other organizations need to be prepared to support their employees during such assaults, and they probably need training in how to doย that.

Academic journals and the other news outlets have to be prepared to stand with their authors against abuse, and they may need to be urged in thatย direction.

Related Posts

on

Illinois watchdog warns natural gas utilityโ€™s plan to prevent methane leaks might be a bait-and-switch for unneeded gas pipeline upgrades that will shoot up consumer costs.

Illinois watchdog warns natural gas utilityโ€™s plan to prevent methane leaks might be a bait-and-switch for unneeded gas pipeline upgrades that will shoot up consumer costs.
Analysis
on

Taxpayers are on the hook as the bitumen extraction industry continues to play by its own rules.

Taxpayers are on the hook as the bitumen extraction industry continues to play by its own rules.
on

The utility is laundering strategic messaging about the energy transition through a partnership with The Atlantic's marketing team.

The utility is laundering strategic messaging about the energy transition through a partnership with The Atlantic's marketing team.
on

The influential newspaper has repeatedly attacked the governmentโ€™s net zero chief Ed Miliband.

The influential newspaper has repeatedly attacked the governmentโ€™s net zero chief Ed Miliband.