Favorable Court Ruling Lets Americans Breathe Easier

authordefault
on

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) scored a huge court victory recently, with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruling that the agencyโ€™s Mercury and Air Toxics Standard (MATS) is within the EPAโ€™s realm ofย enforcement.

The rule, which was put in place in 2012 and would take effect later this year, would tighten the reins on coal-fired power plant pollution.ย  The legal challenge was brought by the dirty energy industry along with several states that contended that the new standards would cost the industry too muchย money.

The three-judge panel found that the rule did not overstep the EPAโ€™s authority, although one of the justices did dissent on part of the ruling.ย  Judge Brett Kavanaugh said that he believed that the EPA did not consider the overall costs to the industry when they made the rule, even if the agency did conclude that the benefits outweigh the costs (that they allegedly didnโ€™t consider). ย 

It is worth noting that Kavanaugh was appointed to the bench by former president George W. Bush after helping Bush craft a plan to pack the courts with conservative justices.ย  Prior to his position within the Bush administration, Kavanaugh worked for the corporate defense firm of Kirkland & Ellis, the firm currently representing BP for their negligence in the Deepwater Horizon oil spillย disaster.ย 

The specific language that was targeted was the phrase โ€œappropriate and necessary,โ€ which appears in the Clean Air Act and is the phrase that gives the EPA the authority to enact new standards.ย  The court found that the industryโ€™s challenge that the rule was neither appropriate nor necessary wasย flawed.

The real issue in the case is that the industry does not want to pay to clean up their operations.ย  However, some companies have already installed the necessary equipment to capture mercury and other toxicย pollution.ย 

In fact, estimates show that almost 60% of the coal-fired power plants in the country are either using mercury capture and cleaning technology, or their emissions are so low that they do not qualify.ย  And contrary to industry claims, the cost of the new equipment has almost no effect on consumer electricity prices and the companiesโ€™ bottomย line.ย 

This makes Judge Kavanaughโ€™s dissent all the more confusing.ย  If, as he claims, the EPA did not take the true costs of implementation into consideration, itโ€™s a simple calculation to make:ย  Kavanaugh estimated that the rule will cost the industry (as a whole) as much as $9.6 billion a year.ย 

The coal industry already receives at least $230 million a year in federal tax breaks, on top of as much as $14 billion in direct subsidies.ย  Even if implementation cost upwards of $10 billion a year, that still doesnโ€™t account for all of the corporate handouts coming from the federal government, so the technology is essentiallyย free.

And thatโ€™s only half of the equation. ย We still have to factor in the cost of not implementing the MATSย rule.ย 

According to the EPA, the rule will save American taxpayers between $37 and $90 billion a year.ย  This is the amount that taxpayers have to shell out for things like lost productivity, uninsured medical care, and overall economic drain.ย  Those figures alone show that the benefits are in a completely separate league from theย costs.ย 

We also canโ€™t forget the non-monetary costs/benefits, which the EPA shows:

photo EPAMATSFacts.jpg

The industry will attempt to use their usual scare tactics to convince Americans that they will be the ones footing the bill for the new rule.ย  But the truth is that we already are paying the price for not having this technology installed.ย 

Americans need to ask themselves if they are willing to step up and pay to protect themselves, their loved ones, and future generations.ย  My guess is that if one of those 11,000 lives saved per year is someone they care about, theyโ€™ll be more than happy to pay a few more cents per month on their utilityย bill.

authordefault

Farron Cousins is the executive editor of The Trial Lawyer magazine, and his articles have appeared on The Huffington Post, Alternet, and The Progressive Magazine. He has worked for the Ring of Fire radio program with hosts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Mike Papantonio, and Sam Seder since August 2004, and is currently the co-host and producer of the program. He also currently serves as the co-host of Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV, a daily program airing nightly at 8:30pm eastern. Farron received his bachelor's degree in Political Science from the University of West Florida in 2005 and became a member of American MENSA in 2009.ย  Follow him on Twitterย @farronbalanced.

Related Posts

on

Illinois watchdog warns natural gas utilityโ€™s plan to prevent methane leaks might be a bait-and-switch for unneeded gas pipeline upgrades that will shoot up consumer costs.

Illinois watchdog warns natural gas utilityโ€™s plan to prevent methane leaks might be a bait-and-switch for unneeded gas pipeline upgrades that will shoot up consumer costs.
Analysis
on

Taxpayers are on the hook as the bitumen extraction industry continues to play by its own rules.

Taxpayers are on the hook as the bitumen extraction industry continues to play by its own rules.
on

The utility is laundering strategic messaging about the energy transition through a partnership with The Atlantic's marketing team.

The utility is laundering strategic messaging about the energy transition through a partnership with The Atlantic's marketing team.
on

The influential newspaper has repeatedly attacked the governmentโ€™s net zero chief Ed Miliband.

The influential newspaper has repeatedly attacked the governmentโ€™s net zero chief Ed Miliband.