B.C. Government Calls on NEB to Compel Kinder Morgan to Answer Oil Spill Questions

authordefault
on

The province of British Columbia has filed a motion with the National Energy Board (NEB) to compel pipeline company Kinder Morgan to answer the provinceโ€™s questions on its Trans Mountain expansionย project.

In the motion, the province argues the company has failed to supply adequate answers to dozens of questions on issues such as oil spill response. A 41-page chart submitted to the NEB by the province outlines all of the instances in which Kinder Morgan did not adequately answer itsย questions.

For instance, Kinder Morgan declined to provide a copy of its emergency response program documents to the province โ€” after promising to do so upon request to โ€œany member of the publicโ€ in its application โ€” on the basis that they contain information of a confidential and sensitiveย nature.ย 

In another instance, the province requested a detailed report on Western Canada Marine Response Corporationโ€™s (WCMRC) ability to respond to a worst-case scenario oil spill. Kinder Morgan responded by telling the province to go ask the marine oil spill responder for that informationย themselves.

โ€œTrans Mountain relies on the response capacity of WCMRC โ€ฆ and makes numerous references throughout the application to such capacity,โ€ says the provinceโ€™s filing with the NEB.

โ€œTrans Mountain ought to provide evidence substantiating the claims made in the application, so that the NEB, the Province, and other intervenors may evaluate the response capacity available for project-related spills โ€ฆ It is not incumbent on the Province or any other intervenor to obtain information which is relied upon by the proponent in its application directly from thirdย parties.โ€

The province argues in the motion that Kinder Morganโ€™s โ€œfailure to file the evidence requested by the provinceโ€ denies intervenors the information required to fully understand the risk posed by the project and Trans Mountainโ€™s ability to effectivey respond to an oilย spill.

โ€œIt further denies the parties a meaningful opportunity to test and clarify the evidence filed by Trans Mountain,โ€ the provinceโ€™s lawyer Elisabeth Graffย writes.

The City of Vancouver and Green Party MLA Andrew Weaver have also complained that Kinder Morgan did not answer theirย questions.

In May, the province submitted more than 70 information requests dealing with maritime and land-based oil spill response, prevention and recovery systems to the NEB.

World-leading marine and land oil spill systems are two of the five requirements the B.C. government has outlined must be satisfied for B.C. to support any heavy oilย pipeline.

The proposed Trans Mountain expansion would triple the pipelineโ€™s capacity, bringing an extra 590,000 barrels of oilsands bitumen to Burnaby each day, where it would be loaded onto 400 oil tankers each year. The hearing process has already been strongly criticized for not including any cross-examination of evidence or any communityย hearings.

Photo: Tyler Ingram via Flickr

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.
on

Campaigners raise concerns over โ€˜alarmingโ€™ potential conflicts in the powerful political grouping.

Campaigners raise concerns over โ€˜alarmingโ€™ potential conflicts in the powerful political grouping.
on

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.
on

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.