Tory Keeps Schtum About Oil Investment During Parliamentary Climate Change Debate. Guess What Happened Next…

Tory Keeps Schtum About Oil Investment During Parliamentary Climate Change Debate. Guess What Happened Next…
on

Conservative MP Peter Lilley failed to disclose a financial interest in Asian oil company Tethys Petroleum during two parliamentary debates on the Climate Change Act and energy prices, profits and poverty.

The self-described ‘global lukewarmist’ is a non-executive director of Tethys Petroleum. He argues that because the company operates solely in Central Asia his position at the company is not relevant to discussions concerning the UK.

A report issued by the House of Commons Committee on Standards on 15 January 2015 stated that “Mr Lilley’s interest in Tethys Petroleum might reasonably be thought by others to have influenced his speeches in the two debates”.

Despite this, the committee did not find Lilley in breach of the code of conduct because it “was not clear at the time he considered the matter”. The report found that because Lilley’s firm does not work in the UK there was no direct financial conflict of interest.

Oil Interest

The decision was reached after a lengthy exchange between Lilley and the committee beginning in early 2014.

The original complaint regarding Lilley’s oil interest – for which he earns £47,000 a year – came after he made speeches in September and November 2013 attacking renewable energy and promoting fossil fuels.

Lilley has since updated his Register entry relating to Tethys Petroleum to make clear that it operates exclusively in Central Asia. The committee is now working to ensure more clarity on the code of conduct in the future.

@kylamandel

Photo: Policy Exchange via Wikimedia Commons

Tory Keeps Schtum About Oil Investment During Parliamentary Climate Change Debate. Guess What Happened Next…
Kyla is a freelance writer and editor with work appearing in the New York Times, National Geographic, HuffPost, Mother Jones, and Outside. She is also a member of the Society for Environmental Journalists.

Related Posts

on

A new report finds that while the multilateral development bank tries to position itself as a climate leader, it still supports gas pipelines, refineries, and gas export terminals.

A new report finds that while the multilateral development bank tries to position itself as a climate leader, it still supports gas pipelines, refineries, and gas export terminals.
on

Lord Vinson is one of the few known donors to the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which advocates for fracking via its campaign arm Net Zero Watch.

Lord Vinson is one of the few known donors to the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which advocates for fracking via its campaign arm Net Zero Watch.
on

Campaigners question “knowledge partner” role for U.S. meat lobby group NAMI ahead of climate summit.

Campaigners question “knowledge partner” role for U.S. meat lobby group NAMI ahead of climate summit.
Series: Aim4C
on

Critics say the US-led Aim4C coalition will sideline nature-friendly farming in favour of a polluting status quo.

Critics say the US-led Aim4C coalition will sideline nature-friendly farming in favour of a polluting status quo.
Series: Aim4C