Low Prices Driving Record U.S. Crude Oil Exports Despite Crude Oil Export Ban

mikulka color
on

โ€œAre you more desperate to get a better deal when youโ€™re poor? I guess you are.โ€

That was John Auers, executive vice president of oil industry consulting firm Turner Mason & Company, describing the oil industry as being โ€œpoorโ€ and โ€œdesperateโ€ to Bloomberg.

As the oil industry cries poverty due to low oil prices in an effort to justify its attempts to lift all restrictions on exporting crude oil produced in the U.S., it is helpful to remember that this is an industry that was demanding tax breaks for oil production even when, in 2013, the top 5 companies made a combined $93 billion in profits. In just the second quarter of 2014 alone, a year of poverty and desperation, as the industry tells it, ExxonMobil made $8.8 billion in profit.

The โ€œbetter dealsโ€ that John Auers was talking about are to be found on the global market, which technically isnโ€™t open to those โ€œpoorโ€ U.S. crude oil producers due to the crude oil export ban. Crude oil that is produced in the U.S. is worth more if it is sold on the world market than if it is sold in the United States.

So, it should come as no surprise that in November, as oil prices began falling, U.S. producers went about finding ways to export oil using some existingย exemptions from the Reagan era as well as some new approaches. Their efforts resulted in the U.S. breaking the all-time monthly export record in November 2014. The previous record was set in 1957, a time when there was no exportย ban.

Desperate times call for desperate measures, as Bloomberg made clear in its reporting back in Octoberย 2014:

U.S. oil exports are set to surpass a record held since 1957 as traders find ways around a four-decade ban on supplies leaving the country.

When there is more money to be made, traders find ways around things like oil export bans.

And this all occurred before the Obama administration handed out a year-end gift to the oil industry by allowing exports of light crude oil while also making it easier for Canada to export tar sands dilbit that has been mixed with U.S. oil. Expect the November crude oil export record to be obliterated soon.

Following on that move, in late December, President Obama was in Mexico agreeing to export more oil to its neighbor to the south. Business Day reported last week that, โ€œThe 40-year-old ban on most US crude exports is set to be loosened after Mexicoโ€™s state-owned oil company asked for an exception.โ€

Apparently if you want to have the export ban lifted, all you need to do is ask.

As they say, traders find ways. And these days Obama is acting like oil trader-in-chief.

So, as oil prices drop, U.S. exports are set to reach record levels. And that is without the actual oil export ban being officially lifted, something Jack Gerard, president of the American Petroleum Institute, has made clear is a top priority for the coming year. Gerard is hardly alone, of course. The CEO of Exxon Mobil also wants the ban to be lifted, for instance.

In December, Republicans held the first congressional hearing on the topic. And as reported earlier by DeSmogBlog, there has been a year-long effort orchestrated by the industry to have the ban lifted. But it isnโ€™t just Republicans doing the oil industryโ€™s bidding: Larry Summers, former secretary of the treasury and economic advisor to President Obama, is alsoย leading the effort to get the ban lifted.

So, while we are hearing reports of how lower oil prices may make fracking for oil in the U.S. unprofitable, the pieces are falling into place to get that oil to the global market, where it will make more money for the producers. And then when oil prices rebound, fracking will be that much more profitable.

The low price of oil has led many to predict the demise of the fracking industry, and the same has been said about the Canadian tar sands industry. Although there are some who say low prices and no new pipelines will shut down tar sands production and make TransCanadaโ€™s Keystone XL pipeline unnecessary, Canada set a new all-time record for oil exports to the U.S. in the first week of 2015.

โ€œThe market finds a way,โ€ Judith Dwarkin, chief energy economist at ITG Investment Research in Calgary, told Bloomberg. โ€œ[I]tโ€™s going to find other ways to move, be that by rail, dog sled, whatever.โ€

As reported previously on DeSmogBlog, rail will be the main method until new pipelines are built. And according to a forecast by Calgary-based investment bank Peters & Co. cited by Bloomberg News, production is going up: โ€œDue to investments already committed, oil-sands production is poised to rise 36 percent to at least 2.6 million barrels a day by 2017.โ€

โ€œWhat you should expect this year is that all incremental heavy oil barrels are effectively going to be transported by rail,โ€ Chris Cox, an analyst at Raymond James Ltd. in Calgary,ย told Bloomberg.

Tar sands production is likely to hit new records in the next year and beyond, despite current pricing.

As the oil industry uses this low-price โ€œcrisisโ€ as a pretext for circumventing the U.S. crude oil export ban while simultaneously working to eliminate it completely, oil companies are really setting themselves up for greater future profits. After all, production in the U.S. and Canada is booming.

And with lower gas prices, Americans are back to buying SUVs. ย Scott Painter of TrueCar explained to NPR about the recent rapid rise in SUV and luxury car sales:

โ€œThere’s no doubt that when you have these kinds of fundamentals in place that you open the door to bad behavior,โ€ Painter said. โ€œWhen gasoline falls below $3, consumer interest in low-mile- or lower-mile-per-gallon vehicles, bigger vehicles, picks up.โ€

Lifting a 40-year-old ban on exporting crude oil due to a short-term dip in prices opens the door to plenty of bad behavior and makes fracking for oil in the U.S. more profitable. But apparently that is the least we can do to help oil companies now that they are poor and desperate.
ย 

Image Credit: Kumpol Chuansakul /ย Shutterstock.com

mikulka color
Justin Mikulka is a research fellow at New Consensus. Prior to joining New Consensus in October 2021, Justin reported for DeSmog, where he began in 2014. Justin has a degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Cornell University.

Related Posts

on

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.
Analysis
on

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.
on

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.
on

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.