Fossil Fuel Industry Funds Study That Concludes Fossil Fuel Divestment Is A Bad Idea

picture-14309-1371183830.jpg
on

As of September 2014, 181 institutions and local governments as well as 656 individual investors representing more than $50 billion in assets had pledged to join the growing fossil fuel divestment movement, which seeks to take investments away from the oil, gas and coal companies that are cooking our atmosphere and reinvest that money in the development of a low-carbon economy.

This has, understandably, caused quite a bit of alarm amongst the fossil fuel set.

Enter Daniel Fischel, chairman and president of economic consulting firm Compass Lexecon, who recently published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal called โ€œThe Feel-Good Folly of Fossil-Fuel Divestmentโ€ in which he discussed the findings of a forthcoming report that โ€œindicates that fossil-fuel divestment could significantly harm an investment portfolio.โ€

Fischel goes out of his way to appear to have the interests of the poor universities called on to divest at heart: โ€œEvery bit of economic and quantitative evidence available to us today shows that the only entities punished under a fossil-fuel divestment regime are the schools actually doing the divesting,โ€ he concludes.

You had to get past the WSJโ€™s paywall and then read to the bottom of the piece before you got to the most salient point: โ€œThe report discussed in this op-ed, โ€˜Fossil Fuel Divestment: A Costly and Ineffective Investment Strategy,โ€™ was financed by the Independent Petroleum Association ofย America.โ€

With the study funded by the Independent Petroleum Association of America, there should be no wonder why Fischel so confidently warned, โ€œStudents and universities may nevertheless wish to make a symbolic or political statement, but they should know it will come at a high price.โ€

The New York Times picked up the story, adding: โ€œProfessor Fischel said in an interview that the industry group and its financing did not influence the outcome.โ€

Thatโ€™s right: A Big Oil front group paid for a study that just so happened to determine that divesting from holdings in fossil fuels is a really bad idea, and weโ€™re to believe that the obvious bias of his client had no influence whatsoever on the way Fischel conducted his research or reached his conclusions.

If you have any doubt that IPAA had an agenda in commissioning this report, look no further than the fact that it has already launched a Twitter account, @DivestmentFacts, that purports to be โ€œAn educational project of @IPAAaccess โ€“ focused on injecting facts, data, real-world perspective into the ongoing debate over divestment.โ€ The IPAA has also created a website for its Divestment Facts campaign built entirely around the Compass Lexecon report and has reportedly organized press interviews for Fischel.

This would not be the first time the IPAA spearheaded an oil industry-backed โ€œeducationalโ€ effort in the face of criticism. DeSmog previously uncovered IPAA‘s role in creating Energy In Depth, a โ€œmajor initiative to respond toโ€ฆattacks.โ€ (A recent report exposed Energy In Depth for relying on โ€œretracted and discreditedโ€ studies in its defense of the shale oil and gas industries.)

But letโ€™s look at the actual claims Fischel makes, which he says are supported by his teamโ€™s research. If you stack the claims of the Compass Lexecon report against the findings of previous studies, itโ€™s clear Fischelโ€™s claims just donโ€™t add up.

The Compass Lexecon report found that funds without energy stocks underperformed those with energy stocks by as much as 0.7%, which Fischel and team say could cost university endowments as much as $3 billion a year.

These findings are starkly at odds with previous studies that found fossil fuel divestment would have little to no impact on returns. Northstar Asset Management predicted a penalty of just 0.15% in a study entitled โ€œTo Paraphrase Mark Twain: The Cost of Fossil Fuel Divestment Has Been Greatly Exaggerated.โ€ And financial advisors at the Aperio Group found that excluding the โ€œFilthy Fifteenโ€ โ€” the worst of the worst in coal-fired energy and mining companies โ€” incurred โ€œvirtually no risk penalty.โ€

Schools that are currently resisting the demands of campus divestment movements are no doubt going to use Fischelโ€™s study to bolster their position. But according to the Associated Press, they would be shooting themselves in the foot: โ€œWhile many schools argue divestment would harm their endowments, an analysis conducted for The Associated Press casts doubt on that. The research firm S&P Capital IQ found that by one measure, endowments would have been better off had they divested 10 years ago.โ€

Jamie Henn of 350.org points out another problem with the Compass Lexecon study, namely that it cherry-picks which data to consider. Oil industry stocks have performed okay over the last 50 years, but theyโ€™ve underperformed in the last 5-10 years. โ€œPast performance isnโ€™t an indicator of future returns,โ€ Henn writes. โ€œThe next 50 [years] of the oil industry will be vastly different than the last 50.โ€

Here is, perhaps, a portent of exactly whatโ€™s in store for oil stocks over the next 50 years, as the nations of the world get serious about combating climate change and moving away from dirty energy. And it’s from an energy policy reporter for, fittingly enough, the Wall Streetย Journal:

Image Credit: James Ennis / Wikimediaย Commons

picture-14309-1371183830.jpg
Mike Gaworecki is a San Francisco-based journalist who writes about energy, climate, and forest issues for DeSmogBlog and Mongabay.com. His writing has appeared on BillMoyers.com, Alternet, Treehugger, Change.org, Huffington Post, and more. He is also a novelist whose debut โ€œThe Mysticistโ€ came out via FreemadeSF inย 2014.

Related Posts

on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.
on

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.
on

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.
on

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.