New Study Exposes True Extent, Influence Of Climate Denial Echo Chamber For First Time

picture-14309-1371183830.jpg
on

Thanks to a recent poll from ABC News and the Washington Post, we know that nearly two-thirds of American adults think global warming is โ€œa serious problem facing the country.โ€

And now, thanks to a study published in the journal Nature Climate Changeย (full study available at this link), we know exactly how many people are out there taking money from dirty energy interests to try and confuse Americans about climate changeto derail overdue action and protect the fossil fuel industries’ profits.

Justin Farrell, a professor of sociology at Yaleโ€™s School of Forestry & Environmental Studies and the author of the report, studied both the institutional and social network structure of the climate denier movement and found that there are some 4,556 individuals with ties to 164 organizations that are involved in pushing anti-climate science views on theย public.

โ€œThe individuals in this bipartite network include interlocking board members, as well as many more informal and overlapping social, political, economic and scientific ties,โ€ Farrell wrote in the report. โ€œThe organizations include a complex network of think tanks, foundations, public relations firms, trade associations, and ad hoc groups.โ€

Farrell notes that while funding from ExxonMobil and the Koch family foundations have notoriously played a part in building the climate denial movement, there was very little empirical evidence demonstrating exactly how much influence these corporate benefactors had on the actual output of climate deniers and, in turn, how much they affected what politicians and other decisionmakers were saying about climate change.

So Farrell studied all of the written and verbal texts relating to climate change produced between 1993 and 2013 by climate denial organizations (40,785 documents comprising nearly 40 million words), as well as any mention of global warming and climate science by three major news channels (14,943 documents), every US president (1,930 documents) and the US Congress (7,786 documents).

He focused on Exxon and the Koch Brothersโ€™ family foundations because, he writes, they are โ€œreliable indicators of a much larger effort of corporate lobbying in the climate change counter-movement.โ€

What Farrell found was that organizations taking funds from โ€œeliteโ€ corporate funders of climate denial like Exxon and the Koch Brothers โ€” groups like the CATO Institute, the Heritage Foundation, and the Heartland Institute โ€” โ€œhave greater influence over flows of resources, communication, and the production of contrarian informationโ€ than other denial groups.

After performing a sophisticated semantic analysis, Farrell was able to show that climate denial organizations with ties to those two major funders were more successful at getting their viewpoint echoed in national news media. Presidential speeches and debate on the floor of Congress showed less of an impact.

According to Bloomberg, Robert Brulle, a sociology professor at Drexel University who has conducted similar research but was not involved in the Nature Climate Change study, said that Farrellโ€™s findings beg a very obvious question:

โ€œWhy is the media picking up and promulgating the central themes of climate misinformation?โ€
ย 

That is very similar to the questions posed by DeSmog’s executive director Brendan DeMelle in his coverage of Justin Farrell’s other recent study on this issue:ย Research Confirms ExxonMobil, Koch-funded Climate Denial Echo Chamber Polluted Mainstream Media. DeMelle listed three questions for media outlets toย ponder:ย 

Will this study, published in a highly authoritative journal, finally compel the newsrooms and boardrooms of the traditional media to take responsibility to undo some of the damage done by their complicity in spreading fossil fuelย industry-fundedย misinformation?

Willย false balanceย โ€” quoting a distinguished climate scientist and then speed-dialingย Pat Michaelsย at theย Cato Instituteย for an opposing quote โ€”ย finallyย stop?

Will editors commit to serving as referees to ensure the same industryย PRย pollution isnโ€™t publishedย anyย longer?

ย 

Image credit: P.WOLMUTH/REPORT DIGITALREA/Redux

picture-14309-1371183830.jpg
Mike Gaworecki is a San Francisco-based journalist who writes about energy, climate, and forest issues for DeSmogBlog and Mongabay.com. His writing has appeared on BillMoyers.com, Alternet, Treehugger, Change.org, Huffington Post, and more. He is also a novelist whose debut โ€œThe Mysticistโ€ came out via FreemadeSF inย 2014.

Related Posts

on

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.
on

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.
on

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.
on

An emergency preparedness conference in Ottawa hosted two days of panels with only limited discussion of climate changeโ€™s root causes.

An emergency preparedness conference in Ottawa hosted two days of panels with only limited discussion of climate changeโ€™s root causes.