California Offshore Oil Fracking Permits Halted While Federal Government Performs Environmental Review

picture-14309-1371183830.jpg
on

The U.S. federal government will stop approving offshore oil fracking operations off Californiaโ€™s coast while it studies how damaging the practice is to the health of wildlife and the environment.

In separate deals with Santa Barbara, CA-based Environmental Defense Center (EDC) and Tucson, Arizona-based Center for Biological Diversity, the U.S. Department of the Interior agreed to assess the risks posed by well-stimulation techniques such as fracking and acidization when used on oil platforms off Californiaโ€™s coast.

Documents obtained by EDC following a 2013 Freedom of Information Act request revealed that the controversial well stimulation techniques were used on offshore platforms, while federal regulators had no idea where or how frequently the practices wereย employed.

EDC filed a lawsuit challenging 53 permits authorizing offshore well stimulation at six offshore platforms, two off Ventura County, California and the other four off Santa Barbara County.

Three of the platforms at issue โ€” Harmony, Heritage and Hondo โ€” are owned and operated by ExxonMobil. Oil from those platforms feeds into Plains All American Pipeline 901, which ruptured last May near Refugio State Beach, spilling 105,000 gallons of oil.

A settlement reached with the EDC requires two agencies within the Interior Dept., the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), to perform an environmental assessment in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act to analyze the potential environmental impacts of fracking and acid well stimulation.

According to the EDC, this is the first time any government agency has been required to evaluate the risks these well-stimulation practices pose to water and air quality as well as many endangered species like blue, fin and humpback whales and the southern sea otter.

โ€œThese practices are currently being conducted under decades old plans with out-of-date or nonexistent environmental analysis,โ€ Brian Segee, senior attorney at EDC, said in a statement, โ€œand this settlement will finally force the federal government to consider their impacts in detail with a transparent process open to public review and input.โ€

Per the settlement, the federal government will not be allowed to issue new permits for fracking from platforms off Californiaโ€™s coast until the environmental review is complete.

The Center for Biological Diversity (CDB), which reached a separate agreement with the Interior Dept., said that at least 200 wells in state and federal waters off Long Beach, Seal Beach, Huntington Beach and the Santa Barbara Channel have used fracking.

The group charged in a lawsuit that the Interior Dept. was โ€œrubber stampingโ€ approval of fracking off Californiaโ€™s coast without engaging the public or analyzing frackingโ€™s threats to ocean ecosystems, coastal communities and marine life.

โ€œOffshore fracking is a dirty and dangerous practice that has absolutely no place in our ocean,โ€ Kristen Monsell, a CBD attorney, said in a statement. โ€œThe federal government certainly has no right to give the oil industry free rein to frack offshore at will.โ€

CBD has documented several serious impacts of offshore fracking near Santa Barbara and Los Angeles, including air pollution, increased earthquake risk and the discharge of toxic chemicals.

Oil platforms off Californiaโ€™s coast are allowed to dump nine billion gallons of wastewater into the Pacific Ocean every year โ€” including fracking chemicals that are acutely toxic to mammals. A 2014 report by CBD scientists found that 10 fracking chemicals routinely used in offshore operations can kill or severely harm a broad variety of marine species, including sea otters and fish.

Both settlement agreements must be submitted to and approved by a federal judge for final approval. The government agencies will have until May 28, 2016 to complete their environmental review of well stimulation from offshore oil platforms.

โ€œEvery offshore frack puts coastal communities and marine wildlife at risk from dangerous chemicals or another devastating oil spill,โ€ Monsell said. โ€œOnce federal officials take a hard look at the dangers, theyโ€™ll have to conclude that offshore fracking is far too big of a gamble with our oceansโ€™ life-support systems. Theyโ€™ll have to stop authorizing it for good.โ€
ย 

Image Credit: cclark395 /ย Flickr.com

picture-14309-1371183830.jpg
Mike Gaworecki is a San Francisco-based journalist who writes about energy, climate, and forest issues for DeSmogBlog and Mongabay.com. His writing has appeared on BillMoyers.com, Alternet, Treehugger, Change.org, Huffington Post, and more. He is also a novelist whose debut โ€œThe Mysticistโ€ came out via FreemadeSF inย 2014.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.
on

Campaigners raise concerns over โ€˜alarmingโ€™ potential conflicts in the powerful political grouping.

Campaigners raise concerns over โ€˜alarmingโ€™ potential conflicts in the powerful political grouping.
on

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.
on

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.