J.K. Rowling Joins Physicist Brian Cox and Monty Python's Eric Idle in Calling Out Climate Science Denial

J.K. Rowling Joins Physicist Brian Cox and Monty Python's Eric Idle in Calling Out Climate Science Denial
on

This is a guest post from ClimateDenierRoundup crossposted from Daily Kos.

What do esteemed physicist Brian Cox, Harry Potter series author J.K. Rowling, and Monty Python comedy legend Eric Idle all have in common?

Besides being some of our favorite Brits, they all share disdain for climate denial, particularly that espoused by far-right Aussie Senator Malcolm Roberts.

It all started on the Australian TV show Q&A, which features a panel of six guests who answer questions. Professor Brian Cox was asked to explain climate change to the senator in denial, and did so with graphs showing rising temperatures and CO2 emissions.

True to denier form, Roberts rejected the evidence presented, citing blogger Steven Goddard (who is so misleading even WUWT rejects him) to claim that NASA has manipulated the data. It’s worth noting that this happened on Monday evening, the day before NASA announced that July 2016 was the hottest month ever recorded.

Roberts didn’t get any better from there. In fact, he was mocked not only by the audience’s laughter and the other panelists, but before long Twitter picked up on the episode.

So NASA’s Gavin Schmidt went on a bit of a tweeting tirade (warranted, given his team was accused of fraud) about how deniers claim there’s manipulation, but the records are publicly available for anyone to test and verify themselves.

And Schmidt was far from the only one to take notice. None other than Monty Python legend Eric Idle asked where deniers like Roberts come from and how they get elected, adding that their denial of climate change is a danger to us all. (Not a particularly funny tweet, but spot on.)

Picking up on Schmidt’s tweet and then adding her own commentary was Princeton-educated-astrophysicist Katie Mack, who was rewarded for her tweet with the standard abuse launched by denier twits. One of them even challenged Mack to “learn some actual SCIENCE.” To which she responded: “I dunno, man, I already went and got a PhD in astrophysics. Seems like more than that would be overkill at this point.”

This magical exchange was then elevated to the ranks of Twitter legend when none other than J.K. Rowling said it had “forever validated” the existence of Twitter.

In honor of the now-global lambasting of denial, we leave you with this: A physicist, a wizard and a python walk into a bar. On TV, an Australian senator is arguing that climate change isn’t real. The physicist chuckles saying, “Obviously he’s an Aussie, he’s got the whole situation upside down!” The wizard scoffs, “All the world’s climate scientists successfully perpetrating a hoax of this scale? Even I don’t believe in magic that powerful!”  But the snake is notably angry.

It hisses “I may be an Egyptian snake, but this is awful. I can’t stand De Nile!”  

You can’t stand at all,” muttered the physicist in response.

J.K. Rowling Joins Physicist Brian Cox and Monty Python's Eric Idle in Calling Out Climate Science Denial

Related Posts

Opinion
on

However impressive Oxford’s environmental credentials may be, it cannot achieve climate justice while retaining its close links with fossil fuel companies, argues Brigitte Wear from the Oxford Climate Justice Campaign.

However impressive Oxford’s environmental credentials may be, it cannot achieve climate justice while retaining its close links with fossil fuel companies, argues Brigitte Wear from the Oxford Climate Justice Campaign.
Analysis

A major new catalogue of fossil fuel company adverts based on DeSmog's research shows the gap between their public image and the reality of their operations.

A major new catalogue of fossil fuel company adverts based on DeSmog's research shows the gap between their public image and the reality of their operations.
Analysis
on

The total cost of decommissioning offshore oil wells around the world is expected to be over $100 billion by 2030.

The total cost of decommissioning offshore oil wells around the world is expected to be over $100 billion by 2030.
on

The institution is already under intense pressure from campaigners over its existing relationships with oil companies.

The institution is already under intense pressure from campaigners over its existing relationships with oil companies.