Mixed Reactions as Feds Give Standing Rock Sioux Partial Victory

authordefault
on

By Larry Buhl and Steveย Horn

Friday afternoon brought a roller coaster of emotions for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and supporters in the battle to stop construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) near the tribeโ€™s North Dakota reservation. Shortly after a court rejected the tribeโ€™s emergency legal challenge, a joint statement by three federal agencies effectively stopped work on the pipeline until significant questions are answered about potential environmental and culturalย impacts.

In August the tribe filed suit to challenge the Army Corps of Engineers’ decision to grant permits to DAPL at more than 200 water crossings for the $3.8 billion Dakota Access pipeline project. The Sioux argued that the project violates several federal environmental laws and would threaten water supplies for millions of people who rely on the Missouri River for drinkingย water.

The Dakota Access pipeline would snake beneath the Missouri River at Lake Oahe. Construction has already damaged sites of significant cultural significance to the Standing Rock Sioux, and continues to threaten furtherย sites.

Snatching Victory From the Jaws ofย Defeat

Minutes after U.S. District Judge James Boasberg issued a 58-page ruling today denying the tribe’s request for a temporary injunction to halt construction, the Department of Justice, the Department of the Army, and the Department of the Interior issued a joint statement to โ€œcease to authorize constructionโ€ on federally controlled lands โ€” essentially nullifying the courtโ€™sย action.

Citing concerns raised by the Standing Rock Sioux lawsuit, theย joint statement reads:

โ€œThe Army will not authorize constructing the Dakota Access pipeline on Corps land bordering or under Lake Oahe until it can determine whether it will need to reconsider any of its previous decisions regarding the Lake Oahe site under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) or other federal laws. Therefore, construction of the pipeline on Army Corps land bordering or under Lake Oahe will not go forward at this time. The Army will move expeditiously to make this determination, as everyone involved โ€” including the pipeline company and its workers โ€” deserves a clear and timely resolution. In the interim, we request that the pipeline company voluntarily pause all construction activity within 20 miles east or west of Lakeย Oahe.โ€

The statement also invited Native American tribes to continue ongoing talks about their concerns regarding pipelines and similar infrastructureย projects.

What Happens Next isย Unclear

The Corps of Engineers can block construction on its land, which does stop the contested Missouri River crossing, at least forย now.

But the federal government canโ€™t stop Energy Transfer from proceeding to construct the Dakota Access pipeline on private land, which is why it asked DAPL to voluntarily halt constructionย there.

It is not certain that the company will voluntarily agree to stop construction in the 20-mile zone on either side of Lake Oahe. If it continues, some Native American cultural and archaeological sites could still face the risk of damage orย destruction.

Dakota Access LLCโ€™s parent company, Energy Transfer Partners, has not responded to repeated requests for comment from DeSmog. The Departments of Justice and Interior said they would not comment beyond what was written in the joint pressย release.

Mixedย Reactions

For now, the tribe and their supporters are treating the joint agency statement as aย victory.

โ€œOur voices have been heard,โ€ said Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave Archambault II, in a statement. Heย continued:

ย โ€œThe Obama administration has asked tribes to the table to make sure that we have meaningful consultation on infrastructure projects. Native peoples have suffered generations of broken promises and today the federal government said that national reform is needed to better ensure that tribes have a voice on infrastructure projects like this pipeline.โ€ย ย 

Craig Stevens, spokesman for the industry-friendly Midwest Alliance for Infrastructure Now (MAIN) said the group was disappointed with Fridayโ€™sย decision.ย 

โ€œHad the decision been different, it most certainly would have had a chilling effect on domestic infrastructure development and the U.S. economy as no sane American company would dare invest the time and resources necessary for proper consultations and approvals only to have its project shuttered halfway through,โ€ Stevens said in a press release.

Not everyone who opposes the pipeline is optimistic. Robin Martinez, an attorney with the National Lawyers Guild in Kansas City, told DeSmog he has mixed feelings about the implications of the jointย statement.

On one hand, he said that it โ€œnot only appears to open review of the Dakota Access permits, but the underlying decision-making process when it comes to pipelinesโ€ and that โ€œit presents an opportunity to help shape the direction of the pipeline permitting process and actually take a hard look at the environmental impacts as required under the National Environmental Policyย Act.โ€

Martinez was doubtful, though, that Dakota Access would stop bulldozing contested privateย land.

โ€œHopefully theyโ€™ll do the right thing and stand down, but given what appears to be their deliberate destruction of Native American historic sites last weekend, I wouldnโ€™t count onย it.โ€

Demonstrations toย Continue

Conflict over the pipeline reached a wider national audience last weekend after video surfaced showing pipeline security workers using attack dogs and pepper spray onย demonstrators.

Support and protesters have continued to flow into the Sacred Stone camp near Cannon Ball, North Dakota. Currently there are more than 100 Native American Tribes represented at theย camp.

North Dakota authorities announced a mobilization of law enforcement at the protest site and National Guard members were dispatched to work security at traffic checkpoints. As of early Friday evening, no incidents had been reported at the camps, in the pipeline construction zone, or in the dozen cities around the country where protests against DAPL are takingย place.

On Friday afternoon, more than six dozen youth led a run for peace to the North Dakota State Capitol in Bismarck, calling attention to their petition to stop DAPL. It was the fourth run for this youth group, who recently ran from North Dakota to Washington D.C. to deliver 252,000 petitionย signatures.

In Des Moines, Iowa, a nonviolent civil disobedienceย event was scheduled for Saturday to protest the use of eminent domain to seize land for DAPL construction in thatย state.


Image credit: Canoe photo from Sacred Stoneย Camp.

Related Posts

on

For years, United, American, and other airlines have led massive lobbying efforts against regulations to prevent climate change.

For years, United, American, and other airlines have led massive lobbying efforts against regulations to prevent climate change.

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.
on

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.
on

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.