Pretty Much the Same Percentage of Trump and UK Voters Support Renewable Energy — And It’s A Lot

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
on

It would be fair to assume a husky-hugging environmentalist from Oxfordshire and a farmer from Wyoming’s agricultural heartland possibly wouldn’t have a lot in common. But new polling suggests they may have one shared trait: they probably both quite like renewable energy.

That’s partly because most people in both the US and UK support renewable energy these days, irrespective of their voting habits.

But the percentage of Trump voters who support renewable energy is still surprisingly close to the number of UK voters that are keen on the technology — almost 75 percent, according to two new polls.

Comparing polls is always tricky, particularly when the questions are slightly different. So any comparisons should be approached with caution.

But data from a recent Yale Programme on Climate Communication poll and the UK government’s latest public attitudes survey suggests support for renewable energy is robust across both ideological and geographical divides.

In the UK, 75 percent of people support using renewables. Among Trump voters, 73 percent want the US to use more renewable energy.

And there is also a similarly tiny level of opposition to renewable energy among the two groups. Only four percent of UK voters oppose the use of renewables. The same number think the US should make less use of wind, solar and geothermal energy in the future.

Lots of people in the UK are largely ambivalent towards renewables, with 21 percent neither support or opposing renewables. Among Trump voters, 13 percent want the US to use the same amount of renewables as now, and 10 percent say they don’t know.

That’s not to say there are no differences.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, given Trump’s repeated pledges to save the US’s coal industry, his voters seem to be much keener on fossil fuels: 55 percent want the country to use more coal, oil and natural gas, and 24 percent want at least the US to use the same amount.

This is where the data comparison gets a bit tricky, as there’s only one fossil fuel specific question in the UK survey, on shale gas. The UK public remains largely against ramping up production of that fossil fuel source, with only 18 percent supporting fracking.

And then there’s climate change.

A large chunk of Trump’s voters — 31 percent — think global warming is not happening. A further 21 percent say they don’t know.

In the UK, only four percent of people think “there is no such thing as climate change”.

But a majority of Trump voters actually want the government to do something about it: 62 percent want the government to either tax, regulate, or do both to the pollution that causes global warming.

At least that should be some consolation to the 70 percent of UK voters concerned about climate change.

Main image credit: Pismo via Wikimedia Commons CC BYSA

Get Weekly News Updates

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
Mat was DeSmog's Special Projects and Investigations Editor, and Operations Director of DeSmog UK Ltd. He was DeSmog UK’s Editor from October 2017 to March 2021, having previously been an editor at Nature Climate Change and analyst at Carbon Brief.

Related Posts

on

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.
on

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.
on

This story was published in partnership with Gen Dread and a video version will be available online on November 16 as part of the Climate Consciousness Summit 2024, staged by the Pocket Project in...
on

Campaigners say the European Commission has “completely embarrassed itself” by offering “flimsy excuses” for taking oil and gas lobbyists to the flagship summit.

Campaigners say the European Commission has “completely embarrassed itself” by offering “flimsy excuses” for taking oil and gas lobbyists to the flagship summit.