Critics Dismiss Government's Plan to Ban New Petrol and Diesel Cars As 'Too Little, Too Late'

authordefault
on

On the same day the government released the long-awaited latest draft of its air pollution plans, the environment secretary Michael Gove was busy publicising a new headline policy. Andy Rowell explains on Oil Change International why the announcement has been dismissed by critics as insufficient to tackle the UK‘s burgeoning air quality crisis.

The UK has followed France in banning the sale of new petrol and diesel cars from 2040, as part of its plan to tackle chronic air pollution in cities.

The government has been coming under intense pressure to act, with an estimated 40,000 people dying prematurely a year from air pollution.

A government spokesman told the press: “Poor air quality is the biggest environmental risk to public health in the UK and this government is determined to take strong action in the shortest time possible.”

They added: “That is why we are providing councils with new funding to accelerate development of local plans, as part of an ambitious £3bn programme to clean up dirty air around our roads.”

But critics have said the ban is already “too little too late”, with many highly critical of the proposals:

The opposition Liberal Democrat shadow transport secretary, Jenny Randerson, said: “Air pollution is poisoning our children and leading to causing avoidable deaths across the country. Instead of properly fighting this silent killer the government has flip-flopped, offering tax breaks for cars that they are now banning. The governments feeble attempts to tackle air pollution are too little too late.

She added: “The Liberal Democrats have called for all new diesel sales to end by 2025 and a scrappage scheme to help drivers convert to greener vehicles. We are serious about fighting air pollution, this government is not.”

Former Labour leader, Ed Milliband, tweeted this morning that: “Fear that new car petrol/diesel ban in 23 years time is smokescreen for weak measures to tackle 40,000 deaths a year from air pollution now.”

The Green Party co-leader, Caroline Lucas, also tweeted: “Welcome start but need urgent plan to cut air pollution *now* – proper clean air zones, funded diesel scrappage, invest in public transport”

Areeba Hamid, the clean air campaigner at Greenpeace, added: “The high court was clear that the government must bring down toxic air pollution in the UK in the shortest possible time. This plan is still miles away from that.”

The Government plan will be released later today after it was forced in the courts to release its clean air strategy after months of legal in-fighting. A judge had ruled that the government’s original plans were so bad as to be unlawful.

James Thornton, from ClientEarth, the campaign group that has pursued the government through the courts over air quality, said. “A clear policy to move people towards cleaner vehicles by banning the sale of petrol and diesel cars and vans after 2040 is welcome, as is more funding for local authorities.

He added: “However, the law says ministers must bring down illegal levels of air pollution as soon as possible, so any measures announced in this plan must be focused on doing that.”

But as I recently blogged, many experts believe that the internal combustion engine will not exist by 2040.

David Bailey an industry expert told the BBC this morning exactly the same thing: “This sets a very clear direction of travel, but petrol and diesel cars won’t exist by 2040”.

Main image credit: Garry Knight via Flickr CC BY 2.0

authordefault

Related Posts

on

From South Africa to Ukraine, five industrial chicken companies that supply KFC have benefited from financing from the World Bank Group and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

From South Africa to Ukraine, five industrial chicken companies that supply KFC have benefited from financing from the World Bank Group and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
on

It’s an effort by the oil sands group to deflect attention away from a long record of misleading climate claims, disinformation expert argues.

It’s an effort by the oil sands group to deflect attention away from a long record of misleading climate claims, disinformation expert argues.
on

The former prime minister attacks flagship climate deals and makes false claims about electric vehicles, Russia’s influence on energy policies, and net zero.

The former prime minister attacks flagship climate deals and makes false claims about electric vehicles, Russia’s influence on energy policies, and net zero.
on

The conference featuring Nigel Farage and Suella Braverman descended into chaos as police were called.

The conference featuring Nigel Farage and Suella Braverman descended into chaos as police were called.