No BBC Science Reporting Course Since 2012, Doc Reveals

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
on

Just one year after an independent review recommended the BBC take โ€œan active approachโ€ to engaging with scientists, the corporation stopped running science reporting courses for its journalists, DeSmog UK canย reveal.

The news comes just weeks after producers of the BBCโ€™s flagship news programme issued an apology for an interview with Lord Nigel Lawson, admitting that his infamous climate science denial โ€œshould have beenย challengedโ€.

A document seen by DeSmog UK, obtained through a freedom of information request submitted by nonprofit Request Initiative, stated that the ‘Reporting Science’ course โ€œceased runningโ€ at the beginning ofย 2013.

โ€œNo document exists to explain why the decision to stop running the course was taken,โ€ itย said.

The BBC implemented the course as a response to a review in 2011 by UCL professor Steve Jones into the โ€œimpartiality and accuracyโ€ of the corporationโ€™s scienceย reporting.

The report criticised the BBC for allowing โ€œan adversarial attitude to science which allows minority, or even contrarian, views an undue placeโ€. It concluded that, โ€œthere should be no attempt to give equal weight to opinion and toย evidenceโ€.

On being told the courses had stopped, Jones told DeSmog UK:

โ€œI did not know that they had been discontinued; but I do know that BBC journalists do not like these compulsory courses as they are busy as hell anyway and the courses tend to fadeย away.

โ€œThe problem is not factual errors most of the time, but an unwillingness to accept that there is a consensus about a scientific issue, because of the constant desire to reportย controversy.โ€

The BBCโ€™s editorial guidelines state that โ€œminority views should not necessarily be given equal weight to the prevailing consensus. Nevertheless, the omission of an important perspective, in a particular context, may jeopardise perceptions of the BBC‘sย impartiality.โ€

Regarding the difficulty of ensuring science reporting is balanced and impartial, Jonesย said:

โ€œI have some sympathy with them [the BBC], but I do think that some of the problems mentioned in my review remain, particularly in radioย news.

โ€œThe recent Lawson affair was a fiasco; I spoke about it on Today the following day and was berated by John Humphries for calling Lawson’s followers โ€˜deniersโ€™ of anthropogenic climate change. That, he said, was a theological term rather than a scientific one. I don’t see that; I deny that the world is flat because, in fact, it isย spherical.โ€

Dr Emily Shuckburgh, an oceanographer with the British Antarctic Survey who recently co-authored a ladybird book on climate change with the Prince of Wales, told DeSmog UK that it remains imperative that the BBC continues to consult experts when covering scientificย issues.

โ€œAccurate broadcast coverage of science is especially important for topics such as climate change where policy decisions are informed by this evidence, as was highlighted by the 2011 Jones review of BBC output,โ€ sheย said.

โ€œMany scientists are proactive in working with BBC science editors and reporters to ensure they have the best access to peer-reviewed research outcomes and plain-language briefings, in addition to providing broadcast interviews. We would welcome any opportunity to engage further, including through input to training courses or other forms of briefing for a wider range of BBCย staff.โ€

Richard Black, BBC newsโ€™ environment correspondent from 2003 to 2012, and now director of the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit thinktank, said it was โ€œcertainly a surpriseโ€ the course had ended after such a short period ofย time.

โ€œWhen BBC management responded to the Jones Review back in 2011 they gave no indication that the courses were a temporary thing โ€“ they were presented as something that would run andย run.

โ€œAnd that would be logical: Steve Jones identified lack of scientific awareness outside the specialist units as a problem that sometimes led to poor editorial decision-making, and the courses were intended to guard against that. Itโ€™s not going to magically stop being a problem, especially given staff turnover and resource cuts โ€“ and the fact that they acknowledged getting it wrong over the recent Lord Lawson interview, and even more so over โ€˜Whatโ€™s the point of the Met Office?โ€™ which was so bad they took it off iPlayer, shows all is not going entirelyย swimmingly.

โ€œI would have thought it entirely logical now to re-introduce the courses and do what they should have done in 2011, namely to make them mandatory for everyone with editorial responsibility who might include scientific topics in their output, including newย recruits.โ€

A spokesperson for the BBC told DeSmog UK that the corporation stood by its decision to interview Lawson for the Today programme, while accepting his views should have been betterย checked.

They did not say whether the BBC had made efforts to replace the Reporting Science course, or explain how the corporation continued to ensure it met the recommendations of the Jones Review,ย however.

The spokespersonย said:

โ€œThis was always intended to be a short-term course. As and when necessary courses are re-run. However, we do not accept the suggestion that this had any bearing on the decision to interview Lord Lawson. The finding was clear that it was acceptable to interview him, but that his comments should have been challengedย more.โ€

Main image credit: Chmee2 via Wikimedia Commons CC BYSAย 3.0

Get Weekly News Updates



ย 

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
Mat was DeSmog's Special Projects and Investigations Editor, and Operations Director of DeSmog UK Ltd. He was DeSmog UKโ€™s Editor from October 2017 to March 2021, having previously been an editor at Nature Climate Change and analyst at Carbon Brief.

Related Posts

on

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.
Analysis
on

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.
on

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.
on

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.