How do you Spot a Climate Science Denial Blog? Check the Polar Bears

R2uAVsWy_400x400
on

In an era of #fakenews, it can sometimes be tricky to work out what is legitimate scientific reporting, and what is, well,ย fake. New research suggests there’s a handy rule of thumb for spotting the work of climate science deniers, however: look for the polarย bears.

One of the most glaring differences between legitimate science-based blogs and those that deny the science on anthropogenic climate change is how they write about polar bears and Arctic seaย ice.

Polar bears have long been a โ€œposter speciesโ€ for climate change. And as it turns out, a new study published by journal BioScience has found that on this issue there is almost zero overlap between climate science deniers and scienceย writers.

The study, released at the end of November, is authored by a group of international scientists including Michael Mann from Penn State University, Stephen Lewandowsy from the University of Bristol and Bart Verheggen from Amsterdam Universityย College.

Looking at 45 climate science denial blogs and 45 science-based climate blogs, the study found โ€œa clear separationโ€ between them with the two groups taking โ€œdiametrically opposite positions on the โ€˜scientific uncertaintyโ€™ frameโ€ regarding melting Arctic ice and the threat to polarย bears.

Whereas the content appearing on science-based blogs overwhelmingly reflects peer-reviewed science, almost 80 percent of climate science denial blogs reference just one source the study shows: a blog written by zoologist Susan Crockford, a scientist who has never done any research on polar bear populations or published any peer-reviewed studies on theย subject.

Crockfordโ€™s claims have been echoed by well-known climate deniers including Matt Ridley and the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF).

For example, in 2013 the GWPF issued a report by Crockford with a forward by Ridley entitled: โ€œTen Good Reasons Not To Worry About Polar Bearsโ€. The report was updated this year ahead of the Bonn COP23 climate conference with 20ย reasons.

Other popular climate science denial blogs such as Junk Science, WattsUpWithThat and Climate Depot all echo Crockfordโ€™s argument as well. But the polar bear trope isnโ€™t just confined to the fringe blogosphere. The argument has found its way into the mainstream press, further amplifying theย misinformation.

In the past, articles have been written by Ridley in the Spectator and Christopher Brooker in the Telegraph. More recently, Breitbartโ€™s James Delingpole wrote on this topic with a March 2017 article entitled โ€œPolar Bears Are a Pest โ€“ Time to End Their โ€˜Threatenedโ€™ Statusโ€, in which he too citesย Crockford.

And when the BBCโ€™s latest Blue Planet II was released this fall, climate science denying former UKIP MEP Roger Helmer took to twitter demanding answers from David Attenborough about polar bears and climateย change.

Helmer alsoย extended the argument toย walruses.

โ€œWe would like other scientists and the general public alike to realize the extent to which, and howย contrarian blogs distort scientific evidence; that there’s an ecosystem of science denial out there in which misinformation is being recycled and amplified,โ€ Verheggen told DeSmog UK.ย 

โ€œTheย blogs have a far and wide reach,โ€ he explained, โ€œso they can’t just be dismissed as a fringe phenomenon, even though scientifically speaking their arguments are at the far fringe indeed. Science is not ‘just another opinion’. A well-informed citizenry is important for a well functioning democracy, and people should be aware of how misinformation is beingย promulgated.โ€

DeSmog Canada looked at the science behind the argument and spoke with another one of the studyโ€™s authors, Ian Stirling, a prominent polar bearย biologist, who told them the problem is that: โ€œIf you tell a lie big enough, often enough, people will begin to believeย it.โ€

โ€œThey distract the public at large, particularly in the U.S.,โ€ Stirling continued, โ€œfrom taking on the biggest threat that the world has everย experienced.โ€

Thatโ€™s why the new study calls the polar bear trope a โ€œkeystone dominoโ€ โ€“ an individual piece of evidence thatโ€™s used to capture peopleโ€™s attention, essentially serving as a proxy for the entire topic of climateย change.

If the theory or science underlying this one topic is shown to be false, then, the studyโ€™s authors explain, the implication bloggers hope to convey is that so too is the rest of theย science.

As the study states: โ€œBy appearing to knock over the keystone domino, audiences targeted by the communication may assume all other dominoes are toppled in a form of โ€˜dismissal byย associationโ€™.โ€

But, as Dana Nuccitelli writes in the Guardian:

โ€œItโ€™s also important that we not lose sight of the forest for the trees. Although it may be interesting to debate whether polar bears will be able to adapt to their rapidly-changing environment, that single climate change impact does not alter the overwhelming body of scientific evidence supporting human-caused global warming and the threats itย poses.

โ€œClimate science isnโ€™t a set of dominoes or a house of cards; itโ€™s a towering structure built on a strong scientificย foundation.โ€

Photo: RayMorris1 via Flickr | CC2.0

Get Weekly News Updates

R2uAVsWy_400x400
Kyla is a freelance writer and editor with work appearing in the New York Times, National Geographic, HuffPost, Mother Jones, and Outside. She is also a member of the Society for Environmental Journalists.

Related Posts

on

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.
Analysis
on

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.
on

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.
on

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.