Statoil Drops 'Oil' From its Name, But Not its Business Model

authordefault
on

Norwegian energy giant Statoil has announced it is rebranding to โ€˜Equinorโ€™, a new name the firm states is inspired by โ€œwords like equal, equality and equilibriumโ€, as well as โ€œNorโ€ forย Norway.

But is this just an exercise in greenwashing? Just how fair and equitable is the companyโ€™sย strategy?

After all, Statoil remains, at heart, a fossil fuelย company.

The firm has been growing its renewable portfolio since 2014 when chief executive officer Eldar Saetre took over, and has spent between 3-5 percent of annual capital expenditure on renewables over the past twoย years.

It already has operational offshore wind farms off the coast of the UK and Germany, and has recently announced plans for two offshore wind farms in the Baltic off the coast of Poland (combined capacity 1,200MW) and to enter its first solar energy project inย Brazil.

Since 2017, Statoil โ€“ which is two-thirds owned by Norwayโ€™s government โ€“ has also been touting its plans to allocate 15-20 percent of its annual investments into renewables byย 2030.

But clever rebranding and promises of clean energy investments canโ€™t mask the fact that this means the energy giant will still continue to invest at least 80 percent into its oil and gasย business.

Considering scientistsโ€™ dire warnings that we need to leave around 80 percent of fossil fuels in the ground and peak greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, followed by a sharp decline, in order to curb the impacts of catastrophic climate change, this is perhaps an underwhelmingย response.

Climate roadmap ‘fallsย short’

According to Statoilโ€™s 2017 โ€˜climate roadmapโ€™, its energy mix, investments, and internal carbon price puts the energy giant on track to reduce its carbon emissions by three million tonnes each year between 2017 and 2030. Its emissions are currently around 15 million tonnes of carbon dioxide perย year.

This might appear impressive, but the planned reduction falls short of Norwayโ€™s national emissions reduction target, Nina Jensen, head of the WWF Norway told Reuters. Statoilโ€™s carbon price of $50 per tonne is also insufficient to keep global warming under two degrees – experts from Stanford University say it needs to be closer to $220 perย tonne

Statoilโ€™s climate roadmap also includes plans to invest in carbon capture and storage, which has so far failed to get off the ground in any commercially viable way. It also notes that the firm intends to carry on burning off excess methane โ€“ which is up to 84 times more potent a greenhouse gas than CO2 โ€“ from its operations untilย 2030.

โ€œThe Norwegian continental shelf will remain the backbone of our company, and we will use our Norwegian heritage in our positioning as we continue growing internationally within both oil, gas and renewable energy,โ€ Statoilโ€™s Saetre stated when the company announced itsย rebranding.

Stranded assets vs roleย model?

Dr Jonathan Marshall, energy analyst with the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, told DeSmog UK: โ€œWhile a step in the right direction, a relatively small pivot towards low carbon energy not only risks blowing international carbon targets, but leaves Equinor at risk of piling money into assets that will, ultimately, become stranded and leave a black mark on companyย accounts.

โ€œA growing number of countries have announced plans to move beyond petrol and diesel cars in the 2030s โ€“ a move that will slash demand for oil-derived fuels and should be considered a huge threat to the business as usualย model.

โ€œLike the UK, Norway is surrounded by shallow waters that are perfect for low-cost offshore wind. Coupled with extensive hydropower reserves, Norway is positioned to seamlessly segue from an oil-fuelled economy to a low-carbonย superpower.

โ€œAs a mainly state-owned company, it is arguable that Equinor should be playing a major role in this transition, instead of aiming to squeeze as much oil and gas as possible from the Northย Sea.โ€

David Powell, head of environment, at the New Economics Foundation told DeSmog UK: โ€œAn oil company rebranding itself ready for a world without oil is a sign of how fast things can change. Itโ€™s just a shame that their investment strategy is limping behind their PR.โ€

Statoilโ€™s re-positioning as Equinor comes after Norwayโ€™s $1 trillion sovereign wealth fund made the shock proposal of divesting from of all of its oil and gas stocks in November last year. This was because the fund did not want to be exposed to market trends around fossilย fuels.

โ€œNorway has been wiser than most in how it uses its oil cash. And like all petrostates, itโ€™s not going to be easy for it to junk the black stuff. It talks a good game, but still intending to be spending 80 out of every 100 krone on fossil fuels, a third of the way into the 21stย century, isnโ€™t leadership. Quite the reverse: itโ€™s a subtle attempt to talk down the potential of the green transition,โ€ Powellย added.

Photo: Haraldย Pettersen/Statoil

Get Weekly News Updates

Related Posts

on

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.
on

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.
on

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.
on

An emergency preparedness conference in Ottawa hosted two days of panels with only limited discussion of climate changeโ€™s root causes.

An emergency preparedness conference in Ottawa hosted two days of panels with only limited discussion of climate changeโ€™s root causes.