Buried, Altered, Silenced: 4 Ways Government Climate Information Has Changed Since Trump Took Office

authordefault
on

By Morgan Currie, Stanford University and Britt S. Paris, University of California, Losย Angeles

After Donald Trump won the presidential election, hundreds of volunteers around the U.S. came together to โ€œrescueโ€ federal data on climate change, thought to be at risk under the new administration. โ€œGuerilla archivists,โ€ including ourselves, gathered to archive federal websites and preserve scientificย data.

But what has happened since? Did the dataย vanish?

As of one year later, there has been no great purge. Federal data sets related to environmental and climate science are still accessible in the same ways they were before Trump tookย office.

However, in many other instances, federal agencies have tampered with information about climate change. Across agency websites, documents have disappeared, web pages have vanished and language has shifted in ways that appear to reflect the policies of the newย administration.

Two groups have been keeping a watchful eye on developments. We both belong to the Environmental Data Governance Initiative, the organization behind the data rescue events. The initiative now monitors tens of thousands of federal websites with the help of specialized tracking software. In January, the group published a report that describes sweeping changes to federal webย resources.

Meanwhile, Columbia Universityโ€™s Silencing Science Tracker documents news stories about climate scientists who have been discouraged from conducting, publishing or otherwise communicating scientificย research.

These groups have documented four ways that climate-related information has become less accessible since Trump tookย office.

1. Documents are difficult toย find

Documents on existing international environmental treaties and national climate policy have been buried or removed from departmentsโ€™ currentย websites.

The State Departmentโ€™s Office of Global Change, for instance, no longer publishes Climate Action Reports, which the U.S. is obliged to produce under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The reports can no longer be found at their former addresses. Instead, they are archived at new addresses in the Departmentโ€™s Obama-era web archive, making the reports more difficult for the public toย access.

Climate reports removed from the State Department website. Versions from Jan. 20, 2017 (left) and Jan. 26, 2017 (right) on the Internet Archiveโ€™s Wayback Machine. URL: https://www.state.gov/e/oes/climate/climateactionreport/index.htm.ย Credit:ย Environmental Data Governance Initiative, CC BY

In another instance, the Environmental Protection Agency removed links to the Climate Change Adaptation Plan documents, which offer guidelines on climate change mitigation. While the web pages still exist on the EPA server, links from key access points on the site have been removed or redirect to a โ€œThis Page is Being Updatedโ€ย notice.

2. Web pages areย buried

Some administrative pages have disappeared from agency sites and can be accessed only from the Obama-era webย archive.

The Bureau of Land Managementโ€™s climate change page โ€“ which discussed the agencyโ€™s climate-friendly approach to land planning โ€“ now exists only in archival form. State Department pages describing the Montreal Protocol, a global effort signed in 1988 to protect the ozone layer, are similarly displaced.

The EPA appears to have been hit the worst. Two hundred of the original 380 web pages on climate and energy resources for state, local and tribal governments are now accessible in archival form only. Whatโ€™s more, the word โ€œclimateโ€ is no longer in the official websiteโ€™sย title.

The EPA also removed the website for the Clean Power Plan, a signature Obama-era regulation that the current administration hopes to repeal.

3. Language has beenย altered

Departments have scrubbed websites of environmental terms. The term โ€œclimate change,โ€ for instance, no longer exists across certain web pages of several agencies, such as the White House, the Department of Transportation and the Department of theย Interior.

Within the Department of Energy, the Clean Energy Investment Center removed the term โ€œcleanโ€ from its title. The Government Accountability Office deleted an online warning that โ€œoil and natural gas development pose inherent environmental and public healthย risks.โ€

In other cases, language has been changed to reflect the new administrationโ€™s agenda. For example, the Bureau of Land Management removed โ€œClean and Renewable Energyโ€ from its list of national priorities, adding โ€œMaking America Safe Through Energy Independenceโ€ and โ€œGetting America Back to Workโ€ย instead.


Bureau of Land Managementโ€™s shifting priorities. Versions from Feb. 7, 2017 (left) and Nov. 26, 2017 (right) on the Internet Archiveโ€™s Wayback Machine. URL: https://www.blm.gov/about. Environmental Data Governance Initiative

4. Science has beenย silenced

But website changes and deletions are just the tip of theย iceberg.

Columbiaโ€™s Silencing Science Tracker records 116 instances when scientists have been obstructed. The list includes budget cuts, staff cuts, unfilled positions and suspended funds. Climate-related research projects have been canceled and climate fellowships rescinded. In some cases, advisory boards and research centers have been dismantledย entirely.

For instance, as of Dec. 31, 2017, the administration had filled only 20 science-related positions out of the 83 total. That pace falls short of both the Obama administration, who had appointed 63, and the Bush administration, who had filled 51, at the same point inย time.

The silencing suggests that the administration values โ€œpro-growthโ€ policies over environmental goals and stands with industry, no matter theย cost.

Why Itย Matters

In most cases, itโ€™s not possible to know who ordered and administered these changes, whether agency staff working independently or the Trump administrationย itself.

History shows us how public information on government activities has changed to reflect the policy directives of different administrations. The Bush era saw a similar chilling affect on scientific research and environmental regulation. Several scientists at the time came forward to accuse the administration of censoring public awareness efforts about climateย change.

In recent years, the U.S. has reduced its own greenhouse gas emissions. And the Obama administration invested in combating climate change and making related information more available to the public. Now that information is being stifled, but climate change continues, whether itโ€™s documented orย not.

The ConversationThese changes are not just damaging to those trying to address climate change. In our view, burying climate science diminishes our democracy. It denies the average citizen the information necessary to make informed decisions, and fuels the flames of rhetoric that denies consensus-basedย science.

Morgan Currieย isย a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Digital Civil Society Lab atย Stanford University and Britt S. Parisย is a Ph.D. student in Information Studies atย University of California, Los Angeles.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Main image:ย March for Science in San Francisco, California, on April 22, 2017.ย Credit: Matthew Roth,ย CC BYNC

authordefault

Related Posts

on

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.
on

Ahead of a city council vote, Resource Works launched an influence campaign with stock submissions for restaurant owners, hospitality workers, and residents.

Ahead of a city council vote, Resource Works launched an influence campaign with stock submissions for restaurant owners, hospitality workers, and residents.
on

Ahead of the November 29 election, dairy producers tell Irish government to step off the โ€œtreadmillโ€ of unsustainable milk production โ€“ and share a more holistic vision.

Ahead of the November 29 election, dairy producers tell Irish government to step off the โ€œtreadmillโ€ of unsustainable milk production โ€“ and share a more holistic vision.
on

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€