Banks Group Under Fire After Protestors Claim Protected Newts Found at Controversial Coal Mine

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
on

A controversial new coal mine is just weeks away from opening – unless a small, spotty amphibian gets in the way, thatย is.

Protesters at the Pont Valley camp near Dipton in County Durham claim to have found one of the creatures. That could be very bad news for Banks Group, which is rushing to start extracting coal from theย site.

Great Crested Newts are protected by European law, and conducting activities to harm the species or their habitat without a license isย illegal.

Banks Group do not have the license, because they say there are no Great Crested Newts onย site.

The issue has been a long-running source of conflict between the company and local residents campaigning against the proposed mine. Itโ€™s now urgent, as Banks need to start the process of extracting coal from the site within 40 days, otherwise its permit to mine willย expire.

The UK government has pledged to phase out coal power by 2025, and protesters say this removes any economic argument to continue mining for the worldโ€™s most polluting fossilย fuel.

Findingย Newts

The process of establishing whether there are Great Crested Newts is not withoutย controversy.

An email from June 2017 obtained through a Freedom of Information request shows Natural England provided Banks Group with three options should Great Crested Newts be found onย site.

One option was to create a new habitat to compensate for the loss at the Pont Valley site. Another was to transport the newts to a newย site.

But a third option gave the company a get out card, campaigners say. It said that the company could employ an ecologist to assess the site – as it standard practice – and they may find that there are no newts on site. In that case, the company could proceed without aย license.

The advice says this is โ€œunlikely to be the caseโ€, however, as Great Crested Newts are a resilient population and were known to live on the siteย historically.

In a subsequent email from February 2018, a Natural England advisor appears to confirm that Banks Group is pursuing โ€œoption 1โ€ – that the companyโ€™s ecologist did not believe a Great Crested Newt population was atย risk.

It said Natural England would therefore ย not be expecting a license application if the companyโ€™s consultant is โ€œsatisfiedโ€ there would be โ€œno residual likelihood of impactsโ€ from Banksโ€™ย activity.

If the company were to now pause work to do new surveys or choose to take a different option, it wouldย likelyย take longer than the 40 days Banks Group has to start the work before its licenseย expires.

That could mean the company would have to reapply for the siteโ€™s license โ€” a process that could take years and would likely be once again challenged by local residents and anti-coalย protesters.

Nextย Steps

In the past week, protesters claim to have found Great Crested Newts on the site, however. They called on the local council to halt Banksโ€™ activity as aย consequence.

Scarlet Hall, a campaigner with Coal Action Network, said in a statement that โ€œno work should be allowed to happen until Banks have a license to safeguard this protectedย speciesโ€.

Natural England responded to being alerted of the finding by publishing a statement that said โ€œIf Great Crested Newts are found on a site the developers must take action and ensure they are not in breach of any wildlifeย legislationโ€.

It said it was no longer within the organisationโ€™s โ€œremit to investigate allegations regarding sightings of great crested newtsโ€, however, as previous surveys on which it had given advice โ€œshowed there were no newts on siteโ€.ย ย 

Professor Richard Griffiths, an ecologist from the University of Kent, told DeSmog UK that while there needed to be โ€œsome quality controlโ€ to establish sightings, it would be โ€œrather recklessโ€ for activities to continue without at least trying to establish the veracity of theย claims.

Without commenting on the specifics of the Pont Valley story, Griffiths told DeSmog UK that generally it would be โ€œa good idea to checkโ€ such claims to ensure there was no illegalย activity.

Lewis Stokes, community relations manager atย Banks Group, told DeSmog UK that,ย โ€œoperations planned at the Bradley site have thoroughly considered all environmental matters including ongoing checking surveys by independentย ecologists.ย โ€

โ€œThese included extensive surveys of all ponds on the site over 2017, using Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling and terrestrial refuge assessment, which found no evidence of any great crestedย newts.โ€

Image: Leonora Enking/Flickr CC BYSA 2.0. Updated 25/04/2018: The Pont Valley camp is in County Durham, not Northumbria as originally stated. The protestors claim to have found one Great Crested Newt, not โ€œsomeโ€ as originallyย stated.

Get Weekly News Updates

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
Mat was DeSmog's Special Projects and Investigations Editor, and Operations Director of DeSmog UK Ltd. He was DeSmog UKโ€™s Editor from October 2017 to March 2021, having previously been an editor at Nature Climate Change and analyst at Carbon Brief.

Related Posts

on

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.
on

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.
Analysis
on

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.
on

Critics say the controversial GWP* method โ€“ which New Zealand appears close to adopting โ€“ is โ€œopen to significant abuseโ€.

Critics say the controversial GWP* method โ€“ which New Zealand appears close to adopting โ€“ is โ€œopen to significant abuseโ€.