Derailed Oil Train Spills 230,000 Gallons of Tar Sands in Flooded Iowa River

mikulka color
on

On June 22, aย train carrying Canadian crude oil derailed in northwestern Iowa, releasing an estimated 230,000 gallons of oil into a flooded river.ย As a result of the derailment, over 30 rail tank cars ended upย in the water, with 14 cars confirmed to have leakedย oil.

To put the size of this spill in perspective, an Enbridge pipeline that leaked in Michigan in July 2010 released roughly 1,000,000 gallons of tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River. Cleanup for this spill, one of the largest inland oil spills onย record, took years and more than $1ย billion.ย 

Like the Kalamazoo River spill, theย train that derailed in Iowa was carrying tar sands oil from Alberta,ย Canada.

This crash, near Doon, Iowa, also is the first one involving the new, safer DOT-117R tank cars that promised to make oil safer to transport by rail. The accident reveals that these tank cars are not foolproof, considering the nearlyย quarter million gallons of oil released from them into an Iowaย river.ย 

Oil Trains Likely to Spill Into Rivers andย Lakes

The reality of rail transport is that train tracks generally follow rivers across North America. As a result, many oil train derailments also mean oil spills into rivers and other bodies ofย water.

The 2015 report โ€œRunaway Risksโ€ by the environmental nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity found that โ€œwithin just a quarter-mile of existing and planned oil-train routes there are 3,600 stream miles and 73,468 square miles of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands, including iconic waterbodies such as the Puget Sound, Lake Michigan, Lake Erie, and the Columbia, Hudson and Mississippiย rivers.โ€

Scientists found that after the deadly 2013 oil train disaster in Lac-Mรฉgantic, Quebec, Canada,ย the resulting oil spill into the Chaudiรจre Riverย had notable impacts on the health of fish and other river life. A year after the disaster, one local fishing guide said, โ€œPeople still fish the lake but the river is prettyย dead.โ€

Less than six months after the Lac-Mรฉgantic disaster, another oil train derailed in Aliceville, Alabama, resulting in a large oil spill into wetlands, with some critics saying the spill cleanup wasn’t properlyย handled.ย 

A similar story happened to the north in Gogama, Ontario, where two oil trains derailed within a month in March 2015 and resulted in two major spills into the Makamiย River.

Shortly after the second derailment Canadian National (CN), the rail company that operated both of the trains that ultimately derailed, stated that โ€œthere is no evidence so far that either the water or air quality near the site have beenย affected.โ€

However,ย CN would not allow anyone from the public to visit the derailment sites. Meanwhile, the Canadian government put CN in charge of all subsequent environmental testing to determine the level of contamination in the river and nearbyย lake.

A year after the accident, CN spokesman Jim Feeny said that test results showed that everything was fine. โ€œThe results show that the lake is clean,โ€ Feeny told the CBC. โ€œThe river water isย clean.โ€

Gogamaโ€™s Fire Chief Mike Benson was initially pleased with the response from CN but later changed his tune. It was over a year after the accidents that Benson learned that CN was in charge of the environmental testing โ€” and he wasnโ€™tย pleased.ย 

โ€œI can’t believe our government tells the fox to test the chickens,โ€ heย said.

Meanwhile, the spokesman for rail company BNSF, which operated the train that just derailed in Iowa, said that โ€œongoing monitoring is occurring for any potential conditions that could impact workers and the community and, so far, have found no levels ofย concern.โ€

In addition,ย since 2014 West Virginia, Virginia, Illinois,ย and Oregon have all experienced oil train derailments which ended up with burning and leaking oil tank carsย either spilling oil in a river or not far from rivers. Last July another train derailed and spilled in Plainfield, Illinois, but based on reports, none of the 45,000 gallons of released oil made it to the nearbyย river.

More Trains + Weak Regulations = Moreย Spills

The oil-by-rail industry has had a good stretch without any serious accidents since Mosier, Oregon in June 2016. However, the main reason for the drop in oil train accidents is the major decrease in the total volume of oil being moved by rail in North America during thatย time.

As weโ€™ve reported on DeSmog, that trend is starting to reverse as Canadian oil-by-railย approachesย record volumes, with U.S. volumes alsoย increasing. Given the lack of pipeline capacity in the prolific Permian Basin in Texas, the oil shale boom there is expected to push more volatile oil onto the rails to get it to refineries andย ports.

Despite the lessons learned from the string of accidents during the last oilย train surge, there have not been significant regulatory changes to address the knownย dangers.

Just weeks before the Iowa accident, Senator Charles Schumer (NY-D) once again called for establishing standards to reduce the volatility of oil moved by rail in order to avoid fires. This was an area thatย oil-by-rail regulations updated in 2015 failed toย address.

Another top safety measure for oil trains was the requirement of modern electronically controlled pneumatic brakes, to help trains stop sooner and over shorter distances. While this was passed in 2015 and scheduled to take effect in 2021, it has since been repealed. After this regulation was announced, the CEO of BNSF told an energy conference that โ€œthis rule will have to be changed in theย future.โ€

The rule requiring modern safety brakes for oil trains was repealed inย 2017.

While those are the top two risks in movingย crude oil by rail โ€” reducing oil volatility and improving braking systems โ€” and neither have been addressed, there are many other known safety improvements that the oil and rail industries have failed to adopt. And now we know the newer โ€œsaferโ€ tank cars also provide no concrete safety benefits over the older, thinner tank cars when a trainย crashes.ย 

In addition, oil trains are still not required to have oil spill response plans, despite these trains being responsible for some of the largest land-based oil spills inย North America in modernย history.

Unfortunately, nearly five years after the Lac-Mรฉgantic disaster, which claimed 47 lives, little has been done to improve the safety of moving volatile oil by rail on this continent. As the oil industry once again turns to rail to transport its products, the real risks of this practice are likely to become apparent onceย again.

The spill in Iowa is just another example of the known risks of moving oil by rail and is likely to require a major environmentalย cleanup.

However, among the major risks isย another fiery oil train accident in a populated area. As National Transportation Safety Board Chairman Christopher A. Hart noted in 2016, that remains a very tangible threat to communities along oil-by-railย routes.

โ€œWe’ve been lucky thus far that derailments involving flammable liquids in America have not yet occurred in a populated area,โ€ Hart announced at a press conference on January 13, 2016. โ€œBut an American version of Lac-Mรฉgantic could happen at any time. Instead of happening out in the middle of a wheat field, it could happen in the middle of a bigย city.โ€

Main image: The oil train pile-up and tar sands spill into aย river in northwestern Iowa. Credit: CBC Newsย screenshotย 

mikulka color
Justin Mikulka is a research fellow at New Consensus. Prior to joining New Consensus in October 2021, Justin reported for DeSmog, where he began in 2014. Justin has a degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Cornell University.

Related Posts

on

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.
on

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.
on

Multnomah County, Oregon, says NW Natural โ€œengaged in an enterprise of misrepresentationโ€ about its productsโ€™ harm to the climate.

Multnomah County, Oregon, says NW Natural โ€œengaged in an enterprise of misrepresentationโ€ about its productsโ€™ harm to the climate.
on

London Assembly member cites a DeSmog investigation that documented hundreds of fossil fuel ads on the cityโ€™s transport network.

London Assembly member cites a DeSmog investigation that documented hundreds of fossil fuel ads on the cityโ€™s transport network.