DeSmog

ExxonMobil's Community Engagement on Plastics Plant Flaring 'Utterly Ineffectual', Residents Say

authordefault
on

At a packed meeting in Lochgelly on Friday, about 200 people, including disgruntled residents, community leaders and local politicians, voiced their anger at continued environmental breaches at a polluting plant that looms large over theĀ area.

The meeting was called following the latest in a series of unplanned flaring incidents at ExxonMobil’s Mossmorran ethylene plant. Local people had raised the alarm over huge plumes of black smoke, chemical-smelling fumes and a rumbling noise emanating from theĀ site.

Although the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) and the manager for Mossmorranā€™s sister plant (operated by Shell) attended the meeting, the event was boycotted by ExxonMobil, with plant manager Jacob McAlister saying he believed the meeting would not ā€œprovide an opportunity for fair, constructive and informedĀ discussion.ā€

That decision caused considerable anger among residents, who feel the company isnā€™t taking their concernsĀ seriously.

ā€œExxonMobil’s decision not to come this evening shows the company’s complete contempt for the communities who host their plant and who have been forced to endure unacceptable impacts in terms of pollution, light, noise and vibration. It is ridiculous for a company of 71,000 employees to suggest no one is available,ā€ said James Glen, chair of the Mossmoran Action Group, which organised theĀ meeting.

ExxonMobil defended its absence, tellingĀ DeSmog,Ā 

ā€œWhile representatives of the Fife Ethylene Plant were not directly invited to the Mossmorran Action Group meeting, we did pro-actively advise the organiser that management were unavailable on the givenĀ date.ā€Ā 

ā€œWe absolutely understand the impact that flaring can have, and that is why we are taking the right and responsible action through a multi-million pound investment programme to further minimise thatĀ impact.ā€

AbandoningĀ residents

The event was just the latest landmark in the communityā€™s long road to get the company to engage with theirĀ concerns.

Glen said that to suggest the company ā€œdoesnā€™t view the meeting as an opportunity for ā€˜fair, constructive and informed discussionā€™ shows just how little respect they have for local people and their political representatives from all parties, who will be thereĀ tonight.ā€

ā€œInstead ExxonMobil has offered private meetings at the plant with MAG reps. I have been to the plant twice at the operators’ invitation, and it’s nothing more than a propagandaĀ tour.ā€

ExxonMobil point to its work on the Mossmorran Safety & Liaison Committee and the Fife Council Air Quality Monitoring Group as proof of the companyā€™sĀ engagement.

But Glen said the groups have been ā€œutterly ineffectual in getting the communities’ concernsĀ addressed.ā€

ā€œNo one trusts them. The more ExxonMobil tries to pretend there is no issue worthy of attention at Mossmorran, the angrier people will become and the pressure for greater government investigation and regulation will becomeĀ irresistible.ā€

ā€œIt’s no wonder more and more people are calling for the plant to be shutĀ down.ā€

Flaring

Flaring has been an issue since the plant first started operations in 1985, but has recently increased in duration and intensity. Last month the site flared for six consecutive days provoking over 900 complaints to SEPA.

ā€œResidents are expected to tolerate days and nights of flaring without respite,ā€ Glen said. ā€œThere are vibrations in peopleā€™s homes and the noise levels are so high it is like being next to an airport 24/7. It is affecting the sleep of both children and adults and there are reports of children wetting theĀ bed.ā€

He added: ā€œIt is causing constant low-level anxiety and stress, with people reporting chemical smells as well as saying conditions like asthma areĀ worsening.ā€

One woman who has a 10 year-old son with autism said he suffered an anxiety attack including wetting the bed during the recent flaringĀ event.

And at another public meeting a teenager told the room that the only topic of conversation between the youths during the flaring is if the plant willĀ explode.

The political consensus that has defended the Mossmorran plant for so long appears to be breakingĀ down.

Last week Fife councillors for the first time backed a motion seeking compensation for residents and communities affected by the flaring. They also said they would ask the ScottishĀ GovernmentĀ to carry out an independent expert study of the plantā€™s impact, as well as debate its long-termĀ future.

Conservative councillor Linda Holt said: ā€œThe original motion for an independent study was put forward by local Conservative councillor Darren Watt in response to a deluge of complaints and rising public anxiety about the safety of theĀ plant.ā€

ā€œYou could see the recent flare from Dundee to Edinburgh and hear it across Fife, while locals reported sleeplessness, breathing difficulties and headaches, and not just children were terrified that the plant was going to blow. The council was unanimous in standing with the residents in feeling that enough wasĀ enough.ā€

The ScottishĀ GreensĀ have also called for the Mossmorran plant to be closed down. Scottish Green MSP for Mid-Scotland and Fife, Mark Ruskell,Ā said:

ā€œThereā€™s no sign from Mossmorranā€™s owners that they are prepared to invest to give the plant a future, so itā€™s becoming increasingly clear that it will need to be shutĀ down.ā€

After Scotlandā€™s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon formally declared a ā€œclimate emergencyā€, there are also growing calls for the site to be closed down on those terms. The plant is the second largest source of carbon dioxide inĀ Scotland.

Ruskell has called on Environment Secretary Roseanna Cunningham to begin planning now for the long-term closure of the beleaguered plant. However, the Scottish Government claims it does not have the power to close theĀ site.

Improvements?

Sepa and ExxonMobil have promised to address the flaring situation as a matter ofĀ urgency.

Sepa recently announced that further permit variations will be served on ExxonMobil Chemical Limited and Shell UK Limited, which shares the Mossmorran site, ā€œto design a programme of monitoring to assess the impacts of flaring on the local community and theĀ environmentā€.

ā€œWhilst subject to a formal regulatory investigation, Sepa has a full range of enforcement powers available and will utilise these to require the impact of flaring be reduced,ā€ the agencyĀ said.

ā€œThe unprecedented number of complaints we received is a clear message that the impacts on peopleā€™s lives is a major concern. Sepa has heard this message powerfully andĀ clearly.ā€Ā 

And a spokesperson for the ExxonMobil Fife Ethylene Plant said it had plans for a ā€œmulti-million-pound investment programme that will work to further minimise the frequency and impact of unplannedĀ flaringā€.

But from the comments in the packed space of that Lochgelly meeting room, it is clear local residents remainĀ sceptical.

Image: Richard WebbĀ CC BYSAĀ 2.0

Related Posts

on

The Conservative candidate has changed his tune on climate action, recently attacking Labourā€™s net zero policies and arguing for new fossil fuel extraction.

The Conservative candidate has changed his tune on climate action, recently attacking Labourā€™s net zero policies and arguing for new fossil fuel extraction.

Clintelā€™s fifth anniversary conference in town outside Amsterdam offers a glimpse of the groupā€™s transatlantic ties.

Clintelā€™s fifth anniversary conference in town outside Amsterdam offers a glimpse of the groupā€™s transatlantic ties.
on

The government is being taken to court for failing to publish the evidence provided to ministers before they backed the controversial scheme.

The government is being taken to court for failing to publish the evidence provided to ministers before they backed the controversial scheme.

Les responsables de campagne critiquent des programmes volontaires Ā« fortement dĆ©fectueux Ā», tandis que lā€™analyse de DeSmog rĆ©vĆØle l'absence de reprĆ©sentation de la sociĆ©tĆ© civile ou des communautĆ©s locales affectĆ©es par les dommages causĆ©s par lā€™industrie des farines et huiles de poisson.

Les responsables de campagne critiquent des programmes volontaires Ā« fortement dĆ©fectueux Ā», tandis que lā€™analyse de DeSmog rĆ©vĆØle l'absence de reprĆ©sentation de la sociĆ©tĆ© civile ou des communautĆ©s locales affectĆ©es par les dommages causĆ©s par lā€™industrie des farines et huiles de poisson.