San Antonio's City-Owned Energy Utility Is Paying a Quarter Million Dollars a Year to Gas Industry Groups

image_50427649
on

Deep in the heart of Texas, by far the nation’s top oil producer,ย the city of San Antonio is starting to grapple withย its reliance on fossilย fuels.

But the key player in implementing the Alamo Cityโ€™s energy transition โ€” the local energy utilityย CPS Energy โ€” remains committed to carbon-based fuels like coal and natural gas, even while it begins to invest more in renewable alternatives. Climate and clean energy advocates in the community have become fed up with the city-owned utility, which is not only stalling in efforts to phase out its fossil fuel portfolio, but is actively funding two gas industry trade associations to the tune of a quarter of a million dollars eachย year.

According to records obtained by the watchdogย Climate Investigations Center and shared with DeSmog, CPS Energy pays over $50,000 in annual membership fees to the American Public Gas Association (APGA), andย over $200,000 annually in membership dues to the American Gas Association (AGA). Both groups lobby for continued dependence on methane gas,ย such as direct use of gas in buildings for things like heating and cooking,ย and oppose efforts to slash emissions by electrifying sectors like buildings and transportation. Their members and sponsors include large energy utilities and pipeline and fossil fuel companies like Duke Energy, Enbridge, TransCanada, and BP.

As DeSmog previously reported in this โ€œUnpluggedโ€ series, the California city of Palo Alto is also helping to fund the American Public Gas Association via membership dues amounting to over $20,000 annually and which are paid by the cityโ€™s municipally owned utility. Some in the community said they see this funding as a conflict withย Palo Altoโ€™s ambitious climateย goals.

Similarly, several environmental activists from the community in San Antonio told DeSmog that their municipal utilityโ€™s funding and support for the methane gas lobby does not seemย toย square with San Antonioโ€™s goal, prescribed in a new city climate plan, to reduce the cityโ€™s carbon emissions to net zero byย 2050.

โ€œTo have a goal of being carbon neutral by 2050, while at the same time paying money to a gas association whose primary goal is to keep us hooked on fossil fuels, yeah, absolutely thatโ€™s a conflict,โ€ said DeeDee Belmares, a San Antonio resident and climate justice organizer with the nonprofit organization Public Citizen.ย ย ย ย ย 

Russell Seal, a fellow San Antonio resident and volunteer with his local chapter of the Sierra Club, said it was โ€œno surpriseโ€ to learn that CPS Energy is a member of these gas lobby groups, and that the utility seems determined to include gas as essential to meeting the cityโ€™s climateย targets.

โ€œWe have a climate action plan that has natural gas in it,โ€ Seal said. โ€œCPS says weโ€™re not going to live without gas.โ€ He said CPS Energy has previously defended its position on methane gas by telling one clean energy advocate that the energy utility โ€œis a gas companyย too.โ€


Screen shot of CPS Energy Tweet, from Octoberย 5, 2020, celebrating its gas service and tagging the American Public Gasย Association.

CPS Energy and Naturalย Gas

CPS Energy is indeed in the gas business. As the nationโ€™s largest municipally owned energy utility, San Antonioโ€™s CPS Energy provides both electric and natural gas service to residents of the seventh-largest city in the country. The utility says it serves over 840,750 electric customers and more than 352,585 naturalย gasย customers.

It describes gas on its website as โ€œan environmentally friendly, abundant fuel source.โ€ That language is precisely the way the gas industry markets this fuel.ย This framing obscures the fact that so-called โ€œnatural gasโ€ is composed almost entirely of the potent greenhouse gas methane, which inevitablyย leaks throughout the gas production and distributionย system, adding dangerous climate pollution to the rapidly warmingย atmosphere.

On its website, the San Antonio utility asserts that fossil fuels, or what it calls โ€œtraditional generation assets,โ€ remain an โ€œimportant bridge to the future to ensure value and reliability to ourย customers.โ€


Screen shot of CPS Energy’s January 6, 2020 letter to environmental stakeholders describing the utility’s position on naturalย gas.

According to CPS Energy, the utility operates 15ย gas-burning units and over 5,500 miles of gas distribution lines. CPS describes methane gas as an โ€œimportant partโ€ of its product portfolio โ€” the fossil fuel makes up almost half (45.4 percent) of the utilityโ€™s generating capacity. This amount has increased by 18 percent between 2010 and 2018, meaning gas has played a growing role in the utility’s portfolio. And even under one CPS planning scenario that envisions a much larger integration of renewable energy, gas and coal power together comprise at least 20 percent of the utility’s generation byย 2040.ย 

CPS Energy even offers rebates for customers who install gas appliances in their homes, and for customers who swap out electric appliances for ones that burn gas. San Antonioโ€™s city-owned utility claims that direct use of gas in homes is much more efficient compared to electric uses โ€” a claim that is disputed by many energy policy experts, such as those at the nonprofitย Rocky Mountain Institute, but nevertheless touted by gas industry trade associations like AGA and APGA.ย 

One spokesperson from Rocky Mountain Institute โ€” a Colorado-based energy and sustainability research center โ€” explained that newer electrical-based heating technologies like heat pumps are actually more efficient than their gas counterparts. โ€œAir source and ground source heat pumps are significantly more efficient than gas devices,โ€ย  said Sherri Billimoria, a senior associate at Rocky Mountain Institute. โ€œHeat pumpsย use electricity to harness energy from the surrounding air or deep in the ground and pump that energy indoors in the form of heat โ€” much like an air conditioner in reverse. These systems can achieve efficiencies three to six times higher than conventional heating technologies like gas furnaces.โ€ย She said these new heating technologies โ€œcan provide carbon and cost savingsโ€ and that โ€œwe should instead be incentivizing customers to switch from gas furnaces to heatย pumps.โ€

CPS Energy spokespersonย Seamus Nelson offered a different view, claiming that methane gas โ€œis an efficient energy choice for home heating and for heat-generating appliancesโ€ and helps lower carbon emissions. According to Nelson, who serves as corporate communications manager, neither the AGA nor APGA has played a role in the gas rebates that CPS Energyย offers.ย 

Nelson saidย the utility’s fiduciary duty to provide reliable energy โ€œis aligned to the sentiments of American Gas Association and the American Public Gas Association,โ€ and he did not deny that the utility gets talking points from gas industry tradeย associations.

โ€œWe do receive information from many organizations, including those focused on the benefits of renewable energy, and use our discretion and expertise when making an independent decision on what information to share through CPS Energy channels,โ€ Nelsonย said.

Paying for Memberships in Gas Lobbyย Groups

CPS Energy is an active member of both the American Gas Association and American Public Gas Association. According to invoice records obtained through public records requests by the Climate Investigations Center and shared with DeSmog, AGA billed CPS Energy $226,345 for membership dues in 2018, and billed CPS $234,018 for dues in 2019. Records show that CPS Energyโ€™s membership dues to APGA totaled $54,000 in 2018 and $56,000 in 2019. Taken together, CPS Energy is paying over $250,000 per year for membership in these two groups that lobby for the interests of gas utilities and the larger gasย industry.ย 

ย 

ย 

An APGA cover letter attached to the 2019 invoice to CPS Energy indicates that membership value in the association includes services such as advocacy and communications. As APGA explained in response to a DeSmog inquiry, the public gas trade association โ€œprovides a number of services to its members, ranging from education and advocacy to assistance on operations and safety โ€ฆ Additionally, as the only trade association that solely represents the interests of public gas systems at the legislative and regulatory level, APGA advocates for legislative and regulatory policy priorities established by its members and educates policymakers about the interests and concerns that impact the operations of public gasย systems.โ€


Screen shot of APGA cover letter addressed to CPSย Energy

DeeDee Belmares, the local climate justice organizer, told DeSmog it is โ€œterribly concerningโ€ that CPS Energy is spending such a substantial amount annually on gas trade associationย memberships.

โ€œWhat do they get from that? What are the benefits to the community when they spend a quarter of a million dollars a year to stay on natural gas? That might explain why they donโ€™t want to move away from fossil fuels,โ€ sheย said.

โ€œThe fact that the utility stays engaged with groups like that, that theyโ€™re not trying to make a just transition, itโ€™s not flattering,โ€ added Greg Harman, a San Antonio resident and clean energy organizer with the Sierra Clubโ€™s Alamo Group.

San Antonioโ€™s Climate Plan and Recall CPSย Petition

In October 2019, the San Antonio City Council adopted a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, which includes the goal for the city to become carbon neutral by 2050, along with interim targets to reduce citywide greenhouse gas emissions by 41 percent by 2030 and 71 percent by 2040. The plan does not mandate cuts in fossil fuel usage and, as Harman explained, it outlines suggestions โ€” like reducing energy consumption in buildings and sourcing more electricity from renewable sources โ€” rather than legally bindingย measures.

โ€œThe climate plan is mainly just recommendations,โ€ he said. He also added that CPS Energy was heavily involved in the planโ€™s development, influencing the final version and offering to pay for theย plan.

โ€œAnd they made sure language that would have forced them to abandon fossil fuels by 2050 was erased,โ€ Harman wrote in an October 23, 2019 post reacting to the city councilโ€™s passage of theย plan.

According to Seamus Nelson, theย CPS Energy spokesperson, the utility was not the sole financial contributor to San Antonio’s climate plan, but โ€œdid provide about $778,000 in helpful funds to underwrite the report.โ€ย ย 

A key area of contention between community activists and CPS Energy is the utilityโ€™s continued operation of a coal-fired power plant.ย The J.K. Spruce coal plant produces 1,300 megawatts of electricity and is the largest polluter and emitter of globe-warmingย gases in the San Antonio area. According to CPS Energy, coal power comprises 18.3 percent of the utilityโ€™s generatingย capacity.

Belmares told DeSmog that, given this large emitter, CPS Energy should be working with the community and the city to sunset the coal plant to meet the cityโ€™s climateย goals.

โ€œWe need them committed as a utility [to the energy transition], they need to be probably the most committed partner in the [climate] plan, seeing as their coal plant contributes to half the carbon pollution in San Antonio,โ€ sheย said.

This commitment has not happened, and so progressive activists in the community have launched a โ€œRecall CPSโ€ petition to hold the utility accountable by removing the CPS Energy board of trustees and putting city council in charge ofย oversight.

โ€œCPS Energy has not worked with us,โ€ Belmares, lead organizer of the petition, said, referring to community membersโ€™ requests that the utility abandon coal, integrate more sustainable energy, and work on a fairer rateย structure.

The Recall CPS Energy Petitionย calls for reorganizing the utility as a department of the city. The mayor and city councilย would govern the utility rather than an unelected board; the petition would also put CPS Energy on a path to close the Spruce coal plant by 2030 and commit to a โ€œfair rate structure,โ€ which involves more transparency and citizen input and requires the utility to incorporate energy efficiency and conservation measures, as opposed to selling more energy to boost profits. The petition aims to get at least 20,000 signatures in order to be put on the municipal ballot, in the form of a charter amendment,ย in Mayย 2021.

DeSmog has reached out to San Antonio City Council and the City of San Antonio’s chief sustainability officer about this proposal but did not receiveย responses in time forย publication.

‘We Expect Better Behavior From the Utility That Weย Own’

Natural gas pipes in a parking garage in Rivercenter Mall in San Antonio
Natural gas pipes in a parking garage in Rivercenter Mall in San Antonio. Credit: Wil C. Fry,ย CC BYNCNDย 2.0

The petition reflects the sense that at least some members of the San Antonio community feel betrayed by their own taxpayer-funded energy utility. Several local activists told DeSmog that CPS Energy has failed to come to terms with the severity of the climate crisis and that the utility seems particularly cozy with fossil fuel and big businessย interests.

โ€œI feel jaded with CPS Energy,โ€ said Russell Seal. โ€œThey view themselves as a business that just happens to be owned byย theย city.โ€

โ€œIn San Antonio we expect better behavior from the utility that we own,โ€ Greg Harman said. โ€œAs owners of the utility, the people of San Antonio are continually sidelined, marginalized, dismissed. Weโ€™re still waiting for a utility that recognizes the existential crisis that weโ€™re in, that recognizes that in one of the poorest large cities in the country, one of the most economically and racially segregated cities in the country, a city that is struggling to breathe, that this is real, that people matter, that they have an obligation to come to the table asย partners.โ€

Although CPS seems to admit on its website that climate change is real, Belmares contends that โ€œCPS has never acknowledged thereโ€™s a climate crisis.โ€ She added: โ€œItโ€™s so concerning that theyโ€™ve got deep ties to the [fossil fuel] industry, and it just shows how uncommitted they are to putting San Antonio onto the road of clean renewableย energy.โ€ย 

These residents say they hope this starts to change under new national leadership from the incoming Biden administration. President-elect Joe Biden has stated that he will strive to put America on a path towards a carbon-free electric power sector by 2035, forย example.

โ€œCPS Energy sees the writing on the wall,โ€ Belmares said, referring to the way the incoming Biden administration has been talking about addressing the climate crisis. โ€œ[CPS] should have been planning for this [energy transition] yearsย ago.โ€

Seal agreed, saying he hopesย that the Biden administration will help communities like theirs push their utilities away from the polluting energy sources that are fueling climate breakdown.ย โ€œHopefully weโ€™re going to get some better direction from the Biden administration,โ€ Sealย said.

Check out the DeSmogย investigative series,ย Unplugged:ย The Gas Industry Is Fighting Efforts to ‘Electrifyย Everything’

Main image: Sunrise in San Antonio. Credit:ย Jonathan Cutrer,ย CC BYNCย 2.0

image_50427649
Dana is an environmental journalist focusing on climate change and climate accountability reporting. She writes regularly for DeSmog covering topics such as fossil fuel industry opposition to climate action, climate change lawsuits, greenwashing and false climate solutions, and clean transportation.

Related Posts

on

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.
Analysis
on

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.
on

Campaigners warn that the UK will face โ€œpressure from American fossil fuel interestsโ€ to slow its energy transition.

Campaigners warn that the UK will face โ€œpressure from American fossil fuel interestsโ€ to slow its energy transition.
Analysis
on

Oil patch advocate Lisa Baiton called for more extraction and less regulation at Vancouver address that didnโ€™t once mention climate change.

Oil patch advocate Lisa Baiton called for more extraction and less regulation at Vancouver address that didnโ€™t once mention climate change.