Co-Founder of Oxford University Petrochemical Research Centre Joins UK’s Leading Climate Science Denial Group

Oxford University fellow Professor Peter Edwards has been appointed to the Global Warming Policy Foundation’s board of trustees.
Co-Founder of Oxford University Petrochemical Research Centre Joins UK’s Leading Climate Science Denial Group
on
University of Oxford
George Hodan / CC0 1.0

The UK’s principal climate science denial group the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) has appointed an Oxford University professor with ties to the fossil fuel industry to its board of trustees. 

Professor Peter Edwards is Professor of Inorganic Chemistry and former Head of Inorganic Chemistry at the university, as well as a Fellow of St Catherine’s College, Oxford. One of Edwards’ primary areas of research is on developing “technology for fossil fuel decarbonisation to mitigate climate change”, according to his Oxford University profile

He is co-founder of the King Abdulaziz City of Science and Technology–Oxford Centre for Petrochemical Research (KOPRC), a centre co-run by Oxford University and a Saudi Arabian research centre. 

The centre conducts research on behalf of the fossil fuel industry including into oil refining, and was highlighted in a report from students last week detailing Oxford University’s ties to the fossil fuel industry. 

Edwards defended the institute, which he states was “designated as a centre of excellence in petrochemicals by Saudi Arabia”, in response to the report, citing KOPRC’s research into low-carbon technologies.

During his time at the University of Birmingham, Edwards was founder of the UK Sustainable Hydrogen Energy Consortium. As well as his work on hydrogen technologies such as fuel cells he has also made leading contributions in the field of so-called carbon dioxide utilisation technologies, which allow carbon dioxide emissions to be recycled and reused, and is a technology promoted by oil and gas producers as a way to mitigate climate change. 

Conflict of interest’

Campaigners with the Oxford University Climate Justice Campaign, which comprises students, academics and alumni, said the appointment showed how closely associated the university remained with those that had an interest in perpetuating the high-carbon status quo.

“Humanity has lost precious decades in the fight against climate change due to the obfuscations of climate denying thinktanks. We are saddened to see Oxford academics helping to undermine legitimate scientific research and enable the further ecological destruction brought about by the fossil fuel industry”, a spokesperson for the group said.

“The fact that an Oxford professor has joined the UK’s principal climate denial think-tank clearly demonstrates that Oxford’s institutional ties to the fossil fuel industry create a clear conflict of interest. Oxford receives money from the fossil fuel industry, incentivising the academics who receive this money to defend the petrochemical industry. This industry, which creates unprecedented ecological damage and perpetuates human right abuses, thereby benefits from the endorsement of Oxford’s academics. Oxford must cut all ties to the fossil fuel industry immediately.”

Responding to the campaigners’ concerns, Edwards told DeSmog he had “spent over three decades helping look for future energy solutions for humankind.” He said he accepted the invitation to join the GWPF’s board because he “was attracted by their stance that they encourage open debate” and its claim to embrace scientists who hold a “broad range of views”.

“My main concern is that some of the so-called ‘climate solutions’, for example renewables and the like, simply won’t cut it in terms of humankind’s future energy needs,” he said. “I believe that the GWPF can be an ideal forum to encourage careful scrutiny and debate about these important issues.”

The GWPF states on its website that “in order to make clear its complete independence, it does not accept gifts from either energy companies or anyone with a significant interest in an energy company.”

Co-Founder of Oxford University Petrochemical Research Centre Joins UK’s Leading Climate Science Denial Group
Rachel is Lead Researcher and Reporter at DeSmog. She joined the organisation in June 2020 as a UK researcher and reporter, having previously worked as a researcher in UK parliament and for the climate charity Hope for the Future.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Sketchy oil waste dumps in Argentina and Texas. Social media campaigns spreading misinformation. The history of white supremacy in the oil industry. Here’s a look at the hard-hitting journalism that DeSmog published in 2021.

Sketchy oil waste dumps in Argentina and Texas. Social media campaigns spreading misinformation. The history of white supremacy in the oil industry. Here’s a look at the hard-hitting journalism that DeSmog published in 2021.
Opinion
Analysis
on

In a year marked by climate-linked catastrophe, the economic drawbacks of fossil fuels stood in stark relief while renewable energy’s slow expansion continued.

In a year marked by climate-linked catastrophe, the economic drawbacks of fossil fuels stood in stark relief while renewable energy’s slow expansion continued.
on

Critics say the North Yorkshire power station is likely to continue burning wood pellets for electricity, and that the amounts granted to new projects are too low to result in any significant technological breakthroughs.

Critics say the North Yorkshire power station is likely to continue burning wood pellets for electricity, and that the amounts granted to new projects are too low to result in any significant technological breakthroughs.
Opinion
Analysis
on

As the climate crisis worsens, the calls for more aggressive action grow louder. 2021 saw more business as usual, industry obfuscation and delay, but also some reasons for optimism.

As the climate crisis worsens, the calls for more aggressive action grow louder. 2021 saw more business as usual, industry obfuscation and delay, but also some reasons for optimism.