Drax Wood Pellet Plans Axed in California

Partner firmโ€™s pivot to wood-chipping may yet harm forests, campaigners warn.
The Merced River in the Sierra National Forest, California. The forest was part of the proposed wood pellet sourcing area. Credit: INTERFOTO / Alamy Stock Photo

Draxโ€™s plans to source wood pellets from Californian forests have been shelved in what campaigners are hailing as an โ€œhistoric victoryโ€.

The Yorkshire-based biomass company, which operates the UKโ€™s biggest wood-fired power station, set the project in motion to build two industrial plants in rural California, in partnership with Golden State Natural Resources (GSNR) last year.ย 

Once built, the factories were set to produce a total of one million tonnes of pellets annually, which would be shipped to Europe and Asia and burnt to create โ€œrenewableโ€ electricity. But at a Wednesday board meeting in Sacramento last week, GSNR announced that it was changing course. Citing โ€œinputโ€ from thousands of public submissions, and โ€œa shift in biomass market conditionsโ€, the government-linked non profit said it would proceed with a โ€œreduced scale projectโ€, which would produce wood chips for the domestic market.

Draxโ€™s plan to source wood from areas that encompass eight protected national forests had prompted a host of environmental concerns. Thousands of residents and experts from a cross-border coalition of 185 organisations had challenged the logic of burning high-carbon wood pellets for energy, as well as raising fears over air pollution for marginalised communities living close to the plants, and the impacts of wood-harvesting on the biodiversity and resilience of Californiaโ€™s wildfire-prone forests, which are home to endangered gray wolves.ย 

Drax already operates 18 wood pellet plants across the U.S. and Canada, but the Memorandum Of Understanding (MoU) with GSNR, finalized in February last year, was the most concrete indication yet of Draxโ€™s ambition to expand into California, a state with 33 million acres of forest.

In 2024, the Yorkshire power station received over ยฃ2 million in subsidies a day from the UK government to burn biomass classified as โ€œrenewableโ€ under international accounting rules, based on the assumption, disputed by scientists and campaigners, that growing new trees can replace the wood lost through burning. 

Earlier this year, the UK government announced it was halving its subsidies for Drax from 2027, and tightening sustainability rules around sourcing. Drax โ€“ which generates five percent of the UKโ€™s electricity โ€“ maintains that its pellets are made from โ€œsustainable biomassโ€ generated from low-grade roundwood, or โ€œresiduesโ€ from sawmills and forests. BBC investigations have repeatedly shown Drax to be burning rare forest wood sourced from โ€œno-go areasโ€ in the Canadian province of British Columbia.

The company, which is the largest single source of carbon emissions in the UK, is looking to expand its global operations further. Its future rests on being able to bring down its carbon footprint using a controversial technology known as bioenergy, carbon capture and storage (BECCS), which aims to remove carbon dioxide produced by burning biomass, by capturing and storing the carbon underground. 

โ€œWe spelled out the writing on the wall: GSNRโ€™s biomass boondoggle is not welcome in California communities,โ€ said Rita Vaughan Frost, forest advocate at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

โ€œCalifornians raised their voices to show they want real clean energy and real solutions to wildfires, not to see their forests ransacked, and communities poisoned just to export climate-busting wood pellets overseas.โ€

Green Party co-leader Adrian Ramsay MP offered his congratulations to U.S. campaigners. โ€œBurning wood is a terrible way to produce electricity,โ€ he said. โ€œChopping down trees destroys nature while growing new trees is simply no replacement for the biodiversity lost in cutting down old forests.

โ€œWe need to be moving rapidly away from this countryโ€™s use of Drax as a source of electricity by using the subsidies it receives to invest in genuine renewables.โ€

โ€˜Sigh of Reliefโ€™

Existing health inequalities would have been exacerbated by the proposed plants and export site, campaigners said.

DeSmog previously reported on the higher-than-average pollution burden, high rates of asthma and cardiovascular disease, and high poverty rate in Tuolumne County, where one of the proposed plants was due to be located in the foothills of the Central Sierra Nevada mountain range.

Communities living near the inland port of Stockton, where the pellets would have been shipped from, are some of the most disadvantaged in the state, and are already exposed to high rates of particulate matter.

Many campaigners also raised concerns around the risk of fire hazards from producing, handling and storing wood pellets โ€“ which would be sourced from within a 100-mile radius from the plants in Tuolumne and Lassen Counties. The production of pellets can release high volumes of sawdust and other harmful particulates that impact air quality.

Golden State Natural Resources says its forest management techniques reduce the risk of wildfires and that it maintains โ€œstringent guardrailsโ€ to ensure the sourcing of materials for pellets is sustainable. 

Mary Booth, director of the forest and climate campaigns group Partnership for Policy Integrity, which analysed GSNRโ€™s claims around improving fire resilience, dismissed the companyโ€™s claims, describing them as โ€œmostly arm-wavingโ€ and โ€œunsupported by their own numbersโ€. 

Gloria Alonso Cruz, environmental justice advocacy coordinator with Little Manila Rising said: โ€œWith this announcement, vulnerable communities in South Stockton can breathe a sigh of relief knowing weโ€™ve protected our community from GSNR. We now turn our attention to its leadership โ€” to demand commitment to development that does not threaten our communityโ€™s health.โ€

Betting on BECCS

Drax is yet to issue any public statement on the decision, and did not respond to DeSmogโ€™s request for comment regarding the project or its future involvement in California.

However, there are signs that Drax is still hoping to build support for Bioenergy, Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) in the U.S., where it sees more opportunity for expansion.

Drax won planning permission to install the technology in the UK last year, but its bid to win a fresh round of subsidies from the UK government, estimated at ยฃ31.7 billion, is currently under review, with a final report due to be submitted in October. It has also lobbied California to be the site of a biomass carbon capture plant. 

In September 2024, Drax earmarked $12.5 billion investment for BECCS expansion in the U.S. under its U.S. subsidiary Elimini. Drax told Reuters it was exploring opportunities to meet โ€œsoaring demand for both 24/7 renewable energy and high-integrity carbon removalsโ€.

GSNR maintains that the company will still look to build plants in Tuolumne and Lassen County, to utilise their direct rail links. The paper lists a number of potential possible markets for wood chips, from green methanol production, as bioenergy fuel for BECCs schemes, Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) and the manufacture of hydrogen.

In a letter to board members in June, GSNR President Patrick Blacklock claimed that switching from pellets to wood chip production would lower the projectโ€™s costs and โ€œenvironmental footprintโ€,  and may expedite the buildout.

A spokesperson for Golden State Natural Resources said that despite the decision to move away from wood pellet exports, its partnership with Drax was โ€œstill in placeโ€. The framework MoU would allow the firm  to explore โ€œsustainable biomass opportunities, with a focus on advancing forest resilience and promoting green energy initiatives worldwide,โ€ they said. 

Gary Hughes, co-director and U.S. coordinator at Biofuelwatch, described the campaignโ€™s success as โ€œmonumentalโ€.

โ€œBringing the wood pellet sector to California would have been akin to the pulp industry getting started here in the 1960s and polluting with impunity for decades,โ€ he said, adding that GSNRโ€™s โ€œchipping visionโ€ was a regression to existing timber industry practice.

โ€œMaking one million tons of wood pellets every year to send them overseas to burn would have been a massive pivot in California,โ€ he said. โ€œWe stopped that disaster from happening.โ€

The fight was still on, added Shaye Wolf, climate science director at the nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity. โ€œThe new proposal to sacrifice forests and communities to make dirty biomass products here in California is still bad for the climate, public health and wildlife,โ€ they said. โ€œWeโ€™ll continue to fight to protect our forests from being industrialized for corporate profit.โ€

Phoebe Cooke headshot - credit Laura King Photography
Phoebe joined DeSmog in 2020. She is currently co-deputy editor and was previously the organisation's Senior Reporter.

Related Posts

on

The Reform leader has barely spoken about his constituency, a deprived area at high risk from the effects of climate change.

The Reform leader has barely spoken about his constituency, a deprived area at high risk from the effects of climate change.
on

Green policy is under threat from corporate lobbying, right-wing parties and media and U.S. interference.

Green policy is under threat from corporate lobbying, right-wing parties and media and U.S. interference.
on

European fertiliser giant has launched a local โ€˜charm offensiveโ€™ to gain support for its chemical factory plan.

European fertiliser giant has launched a local โ€˜charm offensiveโ€™ to gain support for its chemical factory plan.
on

GOP Sen. Thom Tillis took to Senate floor to decry lobbyists like Alex Epstein pushing huge energy moves โ€œwithout a clue about what they are potentially doing to our grid.โ€

GOP Sen. Thom Tillis took to Senate floor to decry lobbyists like Alex Epstein pushing huge energy moves โ€œwithout a clue about what they are potentially doing to our grid.โ€
Series: MAGA