American Energy Alliance (AEA)

American Energy Alliance (AEA)

Background

The American Energy Alliance is a 501(c)(4) not-for-profit organization founded in May, 2008. It is the advocacy arm of the 501(c)(3) nonprofit Institute for Energy Research (IER). According to its website, the AEA โ€œengages in grassroots public policy advocacy and debate concerning energy and environmental policies.โ€1โ€œAbout the AEA,โ€ American Energy Alliance. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/VJO52

While the stated aim of the AEA is to โ€œeducate and mobilize citizens in understanding, promoting and helping to solve Americaโ€™s most pressing energy and environmental policy problems,โ€ this education has taken the form of attack ads against political candidates and messages such as โ€œstand with coalโ€ and โ€œvote no on Obama’s failing energy policy.โ€ This has led to some questions on the validity of the AEA‘s nonprofit status, especially given the AEA‘s own statement that their group is โ€œnot political.โ€2Michael Beckel. โ€œAnti-Obama nonprofit tells IRS it’s not ‘political’,โ€ The Center for Public Integrity, November 18, 2013. Archived May 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/k4qq2 3Stand with Coal,” American Energy Alliance, October 12, 2012. Archived May 8, 2021. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/7LDZj

The American Energy Alliance once declared that it โ€œhas no ties to any political party, and it has no interest in supporting the agenda of any particular political party.โ€4โ€œAbout Us,โ€ American Energy Alliance. Archived June 12, 2010. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/wnjbR However, Brad Johnson at the Wonk Room noted that all of AEA‘s employees at the time were former House Republican staffers and AEA‘s website, EnergyTownHall.org, was also run by a former GOP house staffer.5Brad Johnson. โ€œGOP Team At American Energy Alliance Runs โ€˜Energy Town Hallโ€™ Oil Bus Tour,โ€ The Wonk Room, August 22, 2009. Archived October 12, 2010. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/tuwhW

AEA has also spent millions of dollars on media advertising through Republican-orientated vendor Mentzer Media for its stated nonpartisan activities.6Michael Beckel. โ€œAnti-Obama nonprofit tells IRS it’s not ‘political’,โ€ The Center for Public Integrity, November 18, 2013. Archived May 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/k4qq2

Greenpeace reports that IER and AEA worked together on a $3.6 million anti-Obama gas price advertising campaign funded by Koch Industries. The American Energy Alliance has also received over $3.8 million from Freedom Partners, including $1.5 million in 2012, a 501(c)(6) group directed by many of the Koch brothers’ โ€œinner circleโ€ such as Richard Fink, Marc Short, Wayne Gable, and Kevin Gentry.7โ€œInstitute for Energy Research (IER) & American Energy Alliance (AEA),โ€ Greenpeace. Accessed May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/q1FqQ

Koch Connections

Both the American Energy Alliance and its parent organization, the Institute for Energy Research (IER), are run by Tom Pyle, a former lobbyist for Koch Industries. 8โ€œPyle, Thomas J,โ€ Profile at OpenSecrets. Archived May 20, 2016. Politico reports that Pyle regularly attends the mega-donor summits organized by the Koch brothers, including the 2012 winter summit in Indian Wells, Calif., where the Kochs raised more than $150 million to be directed to groups ahead of the general election.9โ€œKochs linked to anti-Obama gas ads,โ€ Politico, March 29, 2012. Archived May 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/aMh7J

Nancy Pfotenhauer, another lobbyist for Koch Industries, is listed as a Director on AEA‘s 2014 990 tax return. Pfotenhauer, formerly Nancy Mitchell, was an advisor to Senator John McCain during his presidential election campaign, and a former director of Koch Industriesโ€™ Washington office. Pfotenhauer was Koch Industriesโ€™ chief in-house lobbyist from 1996 to 2001 with a focus on gas pipelines.10Carol Eisenberg. โ€œMcCain adviser Nancy Pfotenhauer learned ropes as lobbyist, crusader,โ€ Muckety, September 26, 2008. Archived May 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/0MSSM In 2001, Nancy Pfotenhauer left Koch Industries to become the President of the Independent Womenโ€™s Forum (IWF) and later president of both Americans for Prosperity (AFP) and the IWF. She was also executive vice president for Citizens for a Sound Economy (CSE) a group co-founded by David H. Koch.11(Press Release). โ€œIWF Announces Exciting New Partnership,โ€ Independent Women’s Forum, October 28, 2003. Archived November 19, 2003. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/TpCWC 12โ€œKoch Industries Inc. Lobbying Activities,โ€ DeSmog.

Many of Pfotenhauer’s organizations have received significant funding from Koch Industries. For example:

Stance on Climate Change

2015

โ€œAt a time when the Obama administration is pushing an aggressive climate agenda in Paris, public concerns about the economy and terrorism far outpace anxieties about climate change. Rather than forcing more costly climate policies on the public, world leaders should focus their attention on the economic and national security issues that matter most to people.โ€17โ€œPublicโ€™s Collective ยฏ_(ใƒ„)_/ยฏ on Climate Change,โ€ Energy Townhall (AEA publication), December 8, 2015. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/EIKnu

2014

โ€œEven if the apocalyptic vision painted by Al Gore and others is perfectly trueโ€”which itโ€™s notโ€”measures limiting the emissions from individual cities are utterly absurd. They epitomize the prevalence of symbolism over science in our climate change policy debates.โ€18โ€œNYCโ€™s Climate Goal: Symbolism Over Science,โ€ Energy Townhall (AEA Publication), November 20, 2014. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/XNnEk

โ€œ[A]ccording to official climate models, even if the U.S. enacted an immediate and total ban on all human emissions of greenhouse gases, the difference in global temperature by the year 2050 would be a mere five one-hundredths of a degree Celsius. And thatโ€™s the most that the U.S. government could possibly achieve, even if it relied on a ridiculously draconian ban on all future emissions.โ€19โ€œ‘Risky Business’ Nonsense,โ€ Energy Townhall, July 7, 2014. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/sD069

Fossil Fuels

โ€œThe morally superior choice is for people to be free to use energy to make their lives better. Today, that means having access to the abundant energy resources of coal, oil, and natural gas. Those are the technologies that lifted the developed world out of poverty, and they continue to lift millions out of poverty while they power the high-energy lives of those of us fortunate enough to live in the developed world.โ€20โ€œWhat is the Fossil Fuel Divestment Movement?โ€ American Energy Alliance, February 5, 2016. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/JDkmB

CO2

โ€œCarbon dioxide is not dirty, and is not poisonous to humans in concentrations we observe in the atmosphere. In fact, carbon dioxide is the natural product of combustionโ€“whether that combustion occurs within our cells (which is why humans exhale carbon dioxide), or whether carbon dioxide results from the combustion of natural gas. Carbon dioxide is essential to life on Earth because vegetation requires carbon dioxide to survive and thrive.โ€

[โ€ฆ] The policies that environmental activists advocate for, such as shutting down our nationโ€™s affordable and reliable coal power plants, will make energy more expensive. And as we have seen in countries that have made electricity a luxury good through ill-advised energy policyโ€“like Germanyโ€“higher energy costs exacerbate poverty and the negative health impacts associated with it.โ€21โ€œEarth Day: Continuing a Storied Tradition of Misleading Claims and Outrageous Predictions,โ€ Energy Townhall (AEA publication), April 22, 2016. Archived May 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/1FiCK

Nonpofit Status & Political Activities

The American Energy Alliance is registered as a 501(c)(4) not-for-profit organization, which means it is not required to disclose its funding sources and contributions are not tax-deductible. 501(c)(4) organizations, commonly referred to as โ€œsocial welfareโ€ groups, play an influential role in politics.22Sean Sullivan. โ€œWhat is a 501(c)(4), anyway?โ€ The Washington Post, May 13, 2013. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/gXRMI

The IRS notes that โ€œa section 501(c)(4) social welfare organization may engage in some political activities, so long as that is not its primary activity.โ€ The IRS also notes that โ€œThe promotion of social welfare does not include direct or indirect participation or intervention in political campaigns on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office.โ€23โ€œSocial Welfare Organizations,โ€ IRS, November 18, 2015. Archived May 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/Lmmnl

When the AEA filed for tax-exempt status in 2008, it told the IRS that it had no interest in supporting the agenda or any particular political party or political candidate,โ€ reports The Center for Public Integrity. While AEA acknowledged โ€œthe possibility that some of AEA‘s publications and communications may be considered โ€˜political,โ€™โ€ the group asserted that it was a โ€œnonpartisan policy-oriented organization,โ€ not a ‘political’ organization.โ€24Michael Beckel. โ€œAnti-Obama nonprofit tells IRS it’s not ‘political’,โ€ The Center for Public Integrity, November 18, 2013. Archived May 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/k4qq2

Tax documents show that AEA spent over $5 million on โ€œmedia and advertisingโ€ with vendor Mentzer Media, a media buying firm that works primarily with Republicans, receiving $3.9 million of that amount. In 2012, AEA had produced television ads in swing states Virginia and Ohio encouraging voters to โ€œstand with coalโ€ and โ€œvote no on Obama’s failing energy policy,โ€ while claiming they were not designed to assist Mitt Romney in unseating Barack Obama.25Michael Beckel. โ€œAnti-Obama nonprofit tells IRS it’s not ‘political’,โ€ The Center for Public Integrity, November 18, 2013. Archived May 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/k4qq2

Marcus Owens, an attorney who previously headed the IRSโ€™ tax-exempt division, said the American Energy Allianceโ€™s 2013 tax filing โ€œcertainly raises a red flag.โ€26Michael Beckel. โ€œAnti-Obama Nonprofit Tells IRS Itโ€™s Not โ€˜Politicalโ€™,โ€ Huffington Post, November 18, 2013. Archived May 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/tO9Vt

โ€œItโ€™s a politically active organization,โ€ he told Huffington Post According to Owens, AEA‘s pre-election advertisement blitz โ€œsounds like a lobbying message on its face.โ€27Michael Beckel. โ€œAnti-Obama Nonprofit Tells IRS Itโ€™s Not โ€˜Politicalโ€™,โ€ Huffington Post, November 18, 2013. Archived May 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/tO9Vt

Funding

The following data is compiled from the Conservative Transparency project. Note that as a 501(c)(4) organization, the American Energy Alliance is not required to disclose its donors, so available data is limited.28โ€œAmerican Energy Alliance,โ€ Conservative Transparency. Search performed May 20, 2016.

View the attached spreadsheet for additional details on American Energy Alliance funding by year (.xlsx).

As Recipient

Donor20082010201220132014201520162017Grand Total
Freedom Partners  $1,460,000$40,000$2,367,500$2,935,000$1,000,000 $7,802,500
Center to Protect Patient Rights $250,000$864,960     $1,114,960
American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers*     $340,000$250,000$350,000$940,000
Wellspring Committee$509,000$95,000      $604,000
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers       $50,000$50,000
Americans for Prosperity  $15,000     $15,000
Grand Total$509,000$345,000$2,339,960$40,000$2,367,500$3,275,000$1,250,000$400,000$10,526,460

As Donor

Recipient200920112015Grand Total
Institute for Energy Research $300,000$500,000$800,000
Americans for Prosperity $100,000 $100,000
United for Jobs$15,000  $15,000
American Committment  $10,000$10,000
Americans for Limited Government  $20,000$20,000
Doctors for Disaster Preparedness  $10,000$10,000
Energy Policy Network  $200,000$200,000
Hispanic Leadership Fund  $7,500$7,500
National Black Chamber of Commerce  $15,000$15,000
Taxpayers Protection Alliance  $7,500$7,500
The 60 Plus Association  $37,500$37,500
The Buckeye Institute  $5,000$5,000
Grand Total$15,000$400,000$812,500$1,227,500

Koch Funding

According to Greenpeace, AEA and the Institute for Energy Research have received a combined total of at least $684,742 from Koch foundations between 1997 and 2017.

Greenpeace reports that IER and AEA have received funding from Koch for a $3.6 million anti-Obama gas price advertising campaign.29โ€œInstitute for Energy Research (IER) & American Energy Alliance (AEA),โ€ Greenpeace. Accessed May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/q1FqQ

According to Greenpeace, AEA received $1.5 million in 2012 funnelled through Freedom Partners, a 501(c)(6) business leaguue directed by many of the Koch brothers’ closest connections such as Richard Fink, Marc Short, Wayne Gable, and Kevin Gentry.30โ€œInstitute for Energy Research (IER) & American Energy Alliance (AEA),โ€ Greenpeace. Accessed May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/q1FqQ

990 Forms

Key People

Board of Directors

The following is compiled from publicly available 990 tax forms.

Name2008200920102011201220132014Position
Brian KennedyYY     Director
Dan Kish Y YYYYSenior Vice President, Policy
Dan Simmons   YYYYVice President, Policy
James Clarkson YYYYYYDirector
John Peterson  YYYYYDirector
Lisa WallaceYYYYYYYSecretary/Treasurer
Nancy Pfotenhauer      YDirector
Robert Bradley    YYYIER Executive Officer
Scott Alex Beaulier YYYYYYDirector
Thomas PyleYYYYYYYPresident
Wayne GableYYYYYYYChairman

Staff

Name201031โ€œMeet the Staff,โ€ American Energy Alliance. Archived July 8, 2010. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/21XwX201132โ€œSTAFF,โ€  American Energy Alliance. Archived May 18, 2011. Archive.is URL:https://archive.is/A1ZW6201233โ€œSTAFF,โ€ American Energy Alliance. Archived January 27, 2012. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/9Cp8z201334โ€œStaff,โ€ American Energy Alliance. Archived July 27, 2013.201435โ€œStaff,โ€ American Energy Alliance. Archived March 20, 2014.201536โ€œStaff,โ€ American Energy Alliance. Archived February 2, 2015.201637โ€œStaff,โ€ American Energy Alliance. Archived May 20, 2016.201738โ€œStaff,โ€ American Energy Alliance. Archived February 17, 2017. Archive.is URL:https://archive.is/hzGKtPosition
Benjamin Cole  YYY   Director, Communications
Chris Warren    YYYYVice President,Communications
Dan Kish      Y Senior Vice President, Policy
Daniel R. SimmonsYYYYYYY Vice President, Policy
Doug Macgillivray      YYDirector of Federal Affairs
Dustin DeBerry YYYYYYYDirector, Donor Relations
Genevieve Thornton   YY   Director, Marketing
Hubbel Relat      Y Vice President for State Policy and General Counsel
Jeffrey Hubbard YY     Director, New Media
John Mavretich Y      Director, Communications
Kevin KennedyY       Director, Federal Affairs
Kris Daniel      Y Director, Development
Laura HendersonY       Spokesperson
Lisa Wallace YYYYYYYSecretary/Treasurer
Mike Morrison    YYY Director, Digital Media
Robin Millican   Y    Director, Federal Affairs
Thomas J. PyleYYYYYYYYPresident
Travis Fisher      Y Economist

Actions

May 2020

AEA hosted a watch party for Michael Moore’s documentary Planet of the Humans and, as reported by Heated, spent thousands of dollars to promote it to millions of people.39Emily Atkin. โ€œA party for the planet(โ€™s destruction),โ€ Heated, May 19, 2020. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

โ€œIt turns out the green energy movement is not so โ€˜greenโ€™ after all,โ€ one of the AEA Facebook advertisements reads. โ€œJoin our โ€˜Planet of the Humansโ€™ Watch Party to learn more.โ€40Emily Atkin. โ€œA party for the planet(โ€™s destruction),โ€ Heated, May 19, 2020. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

According to Heated, after reviewing the Facebook Ad Library, AEA spent somewhere between ten and thirteen thousand dollars over four days to promote six ads about the party.41Emily Atkin. โ€œA party for the planet(โ€™s destruction),โ€ Heated, May 19, 2020. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

Planet of the Humans was eventually removed from YouTube over copyright claims. Climate experts had previously called the film โ€œdangerous, misleading and destructiveโ€ and asked it be taken down.42Jonathan Watts. โ€œMichael Moore film Planet of the Humans removed from YouTube,โ€ The Guardian, May 25, 2020. Archived June 1, 2020. Archive URLhttps://archive.vn/zQLyu 43Oilver Milman. โ€œClimate experts call for ‘dangerous’ Michael Moore film to be taken down,โ€ The Guardian, April 28, 2020. Archived June 1, 2020. Archive URL: https://archive.vn/0Ia0D

Planet of the Humans has been described as a โ€œgift to Big Oilโ€ that is โ€œriddled with errors about clean energy and climate activismโ€44Leah C. Stokes. โ€œMichael Moore produced a film about climate change thatโ€™s a gift to Big Oil,โ€ Vox, April 28, 2020. Archived May 29, 2020. Archive URL: https://archive.vn/NgJeE while numerous sources have described its facts as โ€œmisleadingโ€ and โ€œway out of date.โ€45Dan Gearino. โ€œInside Clean Energy: 6 Things Michael Mooreโ€™s โ€˜Planet of the Humansโ€™ Gets Wrong,โ€ Inside Climate News, April 30, 2020. Archived June 1, 2020. Archive URL: https://archive.vn/CeEY0

April 6, 2020

AEA sent an open letter to President Donald Trump supporting the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles
Rule which would scrap federal fuel economy mandates under the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) program.46CAFE-Coaliton-to-Trump-April-2020-9 (PDF), American Energy Alliance.

Describing CAFE, the letter contends: โ€œThose families and individuals who prefer or need trucks, SUVs, and crossovers pay more to subsidize those who buy smaller vehicles or electric vehicles under the existing mandate. This significant, needless, and unjust cost is a very real regressive tax on American families that has made our country worse off.โ€47CAFE-Coaliton-to-Trump-April-2020-9 (PDF), American Energy Alliance.

Signatories were listed as follows:

NameOrganization
Thomas J. PyleAmerican Energy Alliance
Bethany MarcumAlaska Policy Forum
Lisa B. NelsonAmerican Legislative Exchange Council
Michael BowmanALEC Action
Phil KerpenAmerican Commitment
Rick ManningAmericans for Limited Government
Brent Wm. GardnerAmericans for Prosperity
Grover NorquistAmericans for Tax Reform
Jim WatersBluegrass Institute
David T. StevensonCaesar Rodney Institute
Norman SingletonCampaign for Liberty
Matthew KandrachConsumer Action for a Strong Economy
Ryan EllisCenter for a Free Economy
Andrew F. QuinlanCenter for Freedom and Prosperity
Jeffrey MazzellaCenter for Individual Freedom
Isaac OrrCenter of the American Experiment
Leo KnepperCitizens Alliance of Pennsylvania
Chip FordCitizens for Limited Taxation
Mark MathisClear Energy Alliance
Craig RuckerCommittee for a Constructive Tomorrow
Myron EbellCompetitive Enterprise Institute
Craig RichardsonE&E Legal Institute
Robert RoperEthan Allen Institute
Timothy HeadFaith & Freedom Coalition
Annette MeeksFreedom Foundation of Minnesota
Adam BrandonFreedomWorks
George LandrithFrontiers of Freedom
James TaylorHeartland Institute
Jessica AndersonHeritage Action for America
Mario H. LopezHispanic Leadership Fund
Fred BirnbaumIdaho Freedom Foundation
Andrew LangerInstitute for Liberty
Vinnie VernuccioInstitute for the American Worker
Donald van der VaartJohn Locke Foundation
Hector BarretoThe Latino Coalition
Seton MotleyLess Government
Jason IsaacLife:Powered
Brett HealyMacIver Institute for Public Policy
Jason HayesMackinac Center for Public Policy
Christopher B. SummersMaryland Public Policy Institute
Laurie BelsitoMassachusetts Fiscal Alliance
Harry AlfordNational Black Chamber of Commerce
Jonathan SmallOklahoma Council of Public Affairs
Joshua H. CrawfordPegasus Institute
Daniel ErspamerPelican Institute
Horace CooperProject 21
Derrick HollieReaching America
Mike StenhouseRhode Island Center for Freedom & Prosperity
Paul J. GessingRio Grande Foundation
David WilliamsTaxpayers Protection Alliance
Kevin RobertsTexas Public Policy Foundation
Todd MyersWashington Policy Center

March 5, 2020

AEA announced a new campaign to fight against the electric vehicle (EV) tax credit. The series of digital ads urged senators to โ€œblock proposed amendments to the American Energy Innovation Act that would expand the unnecessary, inefficient, costly and unfair electric vehicle (EV) tax credit.โ€48โ€œAEA Launches Initiative to Stop Special Interest Tax Giveaways,โ€ American Energy Alliance, March 5, 2020. Archived March 9, 2020. Archive.ph URL: https://archive.vn/O2Soq

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued a statement:49โ€œAEA Launches Initiative to Stop Special Interest Tax Giveaways,โ€ American Energy Alliance, March 5, 2020. Archived March 9, 2020. Archive.ph URL: https://archive.vn/O2Soq

โ€œSome Senate Democrats are once again focused on expanding the EV tax credit despite its gross inequities. They are using the American Energy Innovation Act as a tool to enrich two auto companies, GM and Tesla, along with wealthy coastal elites, mainly from California and New York. Itโ€™s now time for all Senators, especially Republicans, to stand up for their constituents and stop this obvious handout. No amendments, no deals, and no extensions of the tax credit.โ€

December 17, 2019

AEA released a statement from Tom Pyle praising President Trump50Jon Haubert. โ€œPresident Trump Holds the Line: Protects Middle Class Taxpayers from the Green New Deal,โ€ AmericanEnergyAlliance.org, December 17, 2019. Archived January 1, 2020. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/bIlkn after he pressured lawmakers to eliminate electric vehicle and solar tax credits from a must-pass spending package:51Ari Netter. โ€œTrump Helped Nix Electric Car Tax Measure Sought by Tesla, GM,โ€ Bloomberg.com, December 16, 2019. Archived January 7, 2019. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/wip/DQq90

โ€œAfter a marathon political showdown,โ€ Pyle wrote, โ€œPresident Trumpโ€™s opposition to green subsidies has won the day. Credit is something you earn, not give away. Refusing to expand the costly, unnecessary, and unfair electric vehicle tax credit, the solar investment tax credit, and other green giveaways, is a major win for middle class American taxpayers. [โ€ฆ] President Trump stuck to his guns against a Congress hell-bent on saddling the cost of the Green New Deal on middle class American taxpayers.โ€52Jon Haubert. โ€œPresident Trump Holds the Line: Protects Middle Class Taxpayers from the Green New Deal,โ€ AmericanEnergyAlliance.org, December 17, 2019. Archived January 1, 2020. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/bIlkn 53Ari Netter. โ€œTrump Helped Nix Electric Car Tax Measure Sought by Tesla, GM,โ€ Bloomberg.com, December 16, 2019. Archived January 7, 2019. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/wip/DQq90

Pyle also expressed frustration that the federal wind production tax credit would be extended:54Jon Haubert. โ€œPresident Trump Holds the Line: Protects Middle Class Taxpayers from the Green New Deal,โ€ AmericanEnergyAlliance.org, December 17, 2019. Archived January 1, 2020. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/bIlkn

โ€œBig Wind succeeded in securing themselves another taxpayer-funded, billion-dollar windfall, proving once again they are afraid to compete on a level playing field. You can bet they are already gearing up to take another run at picking our pockets again next year, but they wonโ€™t do so without a fight from AEA. You can take that to the bank.โ€55Jon Haubert. โ€œPresident Trump Holds the Line: Protects Middle Class Taxpayers from the Green New Deal,โ€ AmericanEnergyAlliance.org, December 17, 2019. Archived January 1, 2020. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/bIlkn

November 20, 2019

The AEA purchased a full-page advertisement in The Wall Street Journal calling on the Republican-led Senate to โ€œprotect consumers and taxpayers by eliminating the electric vehicle tax credit once and for all.โ€ 56Jon Haubert. โ€œAEA Launches Initiative Calling on Republican Senators to End Welfare for Auto Manufacturers and Wealthy Coastal Elites,โ€ American Energy Alliance, November 20, 2019. Archived December 9, 2019. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/TKwK3

The ad described the EV tax credit as a subsidy for โ€œwealthy coastal elites,โ€ 50% of whom reside in California.57Jon Haubert. โ€œAEA Launches Initiative Calling on Republican Senators to End Welfare for Auto Manufacturers and Wealthy Coastal Elites,โ€ American Energy Alliance, November 20, 2019. Archived December 9, 2019. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/TKwK3

AEA President Thomas Pyle justified the ad with a statement on AEAโ€™s website:58Jon Haubert. โ€œAEA Launches Initiative Calling on Republican Senators to End Welfare for Auto Manufacturers and Wealthy Coastal Elites,โ€ American Energy Alliance, November 20, 2019. Archived December 9, 2019. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/TKwK3

โ€œHouse Democrats have made expanding the electric vehicle subsidy a top priority before Congress wraps up for the year. This move would essentially enrich two auto companies, GM and Tesla, along with wealthy coastal elites, mainly from California and New York. Itโ€™s now up to the Republicans in the U.S. Senate to stop the madness. No deals, no extensions. Majority Leader McConnell and his Senate GOP colleagues must protect consumers and taxpayers by eliminating the electric vehicle tax credit once and for all. At the very least, they must block the proposed expansion of this welfare program for the wealthy.โ€59Jon Haubert. โ€œAEA Launches Initiative Calling on Republican Senators to End Welfare for Auto Manufacturers and Wealthy Coastal Elites,โ€ American Energy Alliance, November 20, 2019. Archived December 9, 2019. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/TKwK3

October 15, 2019

AEA promoted a recent poll, claiming it revealed a strong voter rejection of electric vehicle purchase incentives.60John Haubert. โ€œVoters to Congress: Make U-Turn on Special Vehicle Preferences,โ€ American Energy Alliance, October 15, 2019. Archived October 17, 2019. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/fULJA

The poll, conducted by AEA in Maine, Michigan, and South Dakota, asked likely voters โ€œhow much they would be willing to pay each year to support the purchase of electric vehicles by other consumers.โ€61John Haubert. โ€œVoters to Congress: Make U-Turn on Special Vehicle Preferences,โ€ American Energy Alliance, October 15, 2019. Archived October 17, 2019. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/fULJA

Some of the statements respondents were asked to agree or disagree with included: 

โ€œI usually trust the federal government to make the right decisions.โ€ 

โ€œThe citizens of the State of Michigan should not help pay for those who buy electric vehicles in California.โ€

โ€œConsumers should pay for their own cars and not rely on tax credits paid for by other consumers.โ€62John Haubert. โ€œVoters to Congress: Make U-Turn on Special Vehicle Preferences,โ€ American Energy Alliance, October 15, 2019. Archived October 17, 2019. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/fULJA

There were no questions relating to climate change, energy policy, or whether respondents would be interested in purchasing an electric vehicle themselves.63John Haubert. โ€œVoters to Congress: Make U-Turn on Special Vehicle Preferences,โ€ American Energy Alliance, October 15, 2019. Archived October 17, 2019. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/fULJA

The reportโ€™s authors concluded:

โ€œVotersโ€™ sentiments about paying for otherโ€™s electric vehicles are especially sharp when they learn they that those who purchase electric vehicles are, for the most, wealthy and/or from California.โ€64John Haubert. โ€œVoters to Congress: Make U-Turn on Special Vehicle Preferences,โ€ American Energy Alliance, October 15, 2019. Archived October 17, 2019. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/fULJA

May 9, 2019

The American Energy Alliance organized open letter fighting against an electric vehicle tax credit.65โ€œDear Senator Grassley, Senator Wyden, Representative Neal and Representative Brady:โ€ May 9, 2019. Retrieved from The Daily Caller.

โ€œThe American Energy Alliance has organized a coalition to proclaim in one unified voice that there should be no expansion of the misguided electric vehicle tax credit,โ€ Pyle wrote in a statement, quoted at The Daily Callerโ€œThere is no question that the electric vehicle tax credit distorts the auto market to no gain.โ€66Christ White. โ€œCONSERVATIVES WARN LAWMAKERSTESLAโ€™S TAX CREDITS โ€˜OVERWHELMINGLY BENEFIT THE RICHโ€™,โ€The Daily Caller, May 9, 2019. Archived May 9, 2019. Archive.fo URLhttps://archive.fo/qzvF3

According to Pyle and others who signed the letter, Electric vehicle tax credits โ€œoverwhelmingly benefit the rich.โ€ DeSmog’s Koch vs. Clean project has systematically debunked this, among other well-rehearsed talking points and misinformation put forward by industry about electric vehicles.67Christ White. โ€œCONSERVATIVES WARN LAWMAKERSTESLAโ€™S TAX CREDITS โ€˜OVERWHELMINGLY BENEFIT THE RICHโ€™,โ€The Daily Caller, May 9, 2019. Archived May 9, 2019. Archive.fo URLhttps://archive.fo/qzvF3

The letter cites research by the Pacific Research Institute (PRI), a group that has received over $600,000 from ExxonMobil and millions from โ€œdark moneyโ€ groups DonorsTrust and Donors Capital Fund

July 18, 2018

The American Energy Alliance, represented by Tom Pyle, was among signatories of a letter supporting an anti-carbon tax resolution from House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) and Rep. David McKinley (R-W.Va.68โ€œ41 Conservative Groups Support Scalise/McKinley Anti-Carbon Tax Resolution,โ€ Americans for Tax Reform, July 18, 2018. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

โ€œWe oppose any carbon tax. We oppose a carbon tax because it would lead to less income and fewer jobs for American families,โ€ the letter read. โ€œWe support the House Concurrent Resolution in opposition to a job-killing carbon tax and urge members to co-sponsor and support this effort.โ€ 69โ€œ41 Conservative Groups Support Scalise/McKinley Anti-Carbon Tax Resolution,โ€ Americans for Tax Reform, July 18, 2018. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

The resolution would call a carbon tax โ€œdetrimental to the United States economy.โ€E&E News reported it was similar to a measure that passed the House in 2016. Rep. Carlos Curbelo of Florida, co-chairman of the Climate Solutions Caucus, said he would not vote for the resolution.70Nick Sobczyk. โ€œHouse voting on anti-carbon-tax measure: ‘Pass the popcorn’,โ€ E&E News, July 16, 2018. Archived Aug 2, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.fo/aTP8h

โ€œProtecting our environment and economic growth are not mutually exclusive,โ€ he said in a statement. โ€œThe resolution presents a false choice.โ€

June 2018

The American Energy Alliance released the results of a poll asking voter’s opinions on electric vehicles (EVs) and fuel efficiency standards.71โ€œNew Survey: Voters (Still) Find Vehicle Subsidies ‘Unfair’,โ€ American Energy Alliance, June 19, 2018. Archived June 21, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/Kw2YF DeSmog, after reviewing the actual poll questions,72โ€œMWR Strategiesโ€ (PDF), June 2018. Retrieved from AmericanEnergyAlliance.org. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. reported the poll73โ€œPoll by Former Koch Lobbyist Skews Public Support for Clean Cars, Electric Vehicles,โ€ DeSmog, June 20, 2018. was an example of a โ€œpush poll,โ€ defined by the American Association for Public Opinion Research as โ€œa form of negative campaigning that is disguised as a political poll.โ€74โ€œWhat is a ‘Push’ Poll?โ€ AAPORArchived June 21, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/fIaYW

โ€œVoters want to make their own decisions about what kind of cars and trucks to buy. And they definitely donโ€™t want to pay for the toys of the rich,โ€ the American Energy Alliance said was the takeaway from the results.75John Siciliano. โ€œMost voters don’t like electric cars because of the subsidies, says new poll,โ€ Washington Examiner, June 19, 2018. Archived June 21, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/32S7u

The poll was conducted by MWR Strategies, a lobbying firm whose clients have included Koch Industries and the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers. The questions implant the idea that consumers are being pushed to buy certain vehicles and that taxpayers are being forced to pay for the federal programs that support EV sales.76โ€œPoll by Former Koch Lobbyist Skews Public Support for Clean Cars, Electric Vehicles,โ€ DeSmog, June 20, 2018.

For example, one question states that every purchaser of an electric vehicle is paid โ€œ75 hundred dollarsโ€ by the โ€œtaxpayer,โ€ which misrepresents the mechanics of the non-refundable electric vehicle tax credit. The tax credit simply lowers the buyerโ€™s tax rate in the year of purchase โ€” functionally the same way that a home mortgage interest deduction or child tax credit works.77โ€œPoll by Former Koch Lobbyist Skews Public Support for Clean Cars, Electric Vehicles,โ€ DeSmog, June 20, 2018.

Another question claims that the average income of an electric car buyer is $150,000, and then asks whether the respondent thinks itโ€™s โ€œfairโ€ that the buyer should โ€œbe paid 75 hundred dollars.โ€ As of 2016, 54 percent of EV purchasers have a household income above $100,000, not $150,000. Also not noted, nearly 80 percent of EVs are leased rather than purchased, and only 38 percent of leases have a household income above $100,000.78โ€œPoll by Former Koch Lobbyist Skews Public Support for Clean Cars, Electric Vehicles,โ€ DeSmog, June 20, 2018.

Below is a sample of one split sample question, where the interviewer uses to different wordings to ask the same question:79โ€œPoll by Former Koch Lobbyist Skews Public Support for Clean Cars, Electric Vehicles,โ€ DeSmog, June 20, 2018.

The first question, set up to make respondents feel a direct personal sacrifice, 29 percent answered that this was โ€œway too muchโ€ and 25 percent said it was โ€œabout right.โ€ The second question, framed without the direct emotional connection, the percentage of respondents that said it was โ€œabout rightโ€ rose slightly to 27 percent, and those who said it was โ€œway too muchโ€ dropped to 19 percent. Both wordings were misleading, considering a tax credit is not a payment from the government and not all buyers of EVs get the full value of the tax credit.80โ€œPoll by Former Koch Lobbyist Skews Public Support for Clean Cars, Electric Vehicles,โ€ DeSmog, June 20, 2018.

April 23, 2018

The AEA, represented by Thomas Pyle, was among 22 groups signed on to an open letter asking President Trump to ignore recent criticism of EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt.81โ€œCoalition letter to the President on Scott Pruitt,โ€ (PDF) Heartland Institute. Archived .pdf on file with DeSmog.

In a speech to the U.S. Senate, a group of Democratic senators identified the organizations as front groups for the Koch Brothers and other wealthy donors, nicknamed the โ€œWeb of Deceit.โ€ The senators outlined how, in addition to funding from the Koch network, many of the groups use untraceable โ€œdark moneyโ€ funneled through groups like Donors Capital Fund and Donors Trust to influence legislation, particularly with regards to climate and pollution.

Senator Whitehouse outlined it as โ€œa web of deceit conceived and bankrolled by the Koch brothers and other self-interested billionaires to advocate for very selfish and unpatriotic policies.โ€ Whitehouse added: โ€œThis web of deceit has infiltrated and populated the Trump administration, and it is swamping the interests of everyday Americans.82Senator Whitehouse. โ€œTime to wake up: Web of Deceitโ€ April 23, 2018. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.li/HzIsa

The full list of pro-Pruitt signatories and their respective organizations is as follows:

May 8, 2017

The American Energy Alliance, represented by Thomas J. Pyle is listed on an open letter to President Donald J. Trump urging him โ€œto withdraw fully from the Paris Climate Treaty and to stop all taxpayer funding of UN global warming programs.โ€83โ€œDear Mr. Presidentโ€ (PDF), retrieved from Competitive Enterprise Institute. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

DeSmog reported that the 40 groups represented in the letter, including the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), The Heartland Institute, and the Heritage Foundation, have received a combined total of millions of dollars from the Koch Brothers, ExxonMobil, and other industry groups.84Graham Readfearn. โ€œConservative Groups Pushing Trump To Exit Paris Climate Deal Have Taken Millions From Koch Brothers, Exxon,โ€ DeSmog, May 10, 2017.

Analysis also showed that the groups accepted about $80 million through Donors Capital Fund and Donors Trust, two groups that have been confirmed is a key financial source for key U.S-based climate change denial groups.85Susanne Goldberg. โ€œConservative groups spend up to bn a year to fight action on climate change,โ€ The Guardian, December 20, 2013. Archived May 12, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/TB2yy

January 12, 2017

The AEA‘s Thomas Pyle was a signatory to a January 12, 2017 official letter of support (PDF) for Scott Pruitt, in which numerous groups, including The Heartland Institute, and others, declared that the Senate should โ€œswiftly approve his nominationโ€ for Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

 Other signatories of the letter included:86โ€œDear Senators,โ€ (PDF)Competitive Enterprise Institute, January 12, 2017. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

December 2016

Thomas Pyle was chosen to head Donald Trump’s energy transition team after Mike McKenna stepped down from the position.87Julian Spector. โ€œTrump Energy Team Swaps Out Its Transition Team Leader,โ€ Green Tech Media, December 1, 2016.  Archived December 7, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/uDcE5

Shortly before his appointment, Pyle had sent a a memo (see full .pdf)โ€”obtained and published by the Center for Media and Democracyโ€”to a private email list outlining โ€œThe Trump Administration’s Energy Plan.โ€ Pyle’s memo, featuring a banner with both the American Energy Alliance (AEA) and Institute for Energy Research (IER) logos included 14 policy proposals such as:88โ€œPyle-What-to-Expect-From-the-Trump-Administration.pdfโ€ From the Desk of Thomas Pyle. Retrieved from Documentcloud.org. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. 89Nick Surgey. โ€œREVEALEDTHE TRUMP ADMINISTRATIONโ€™S ENERGY PLAN,โ€ The Center for Media and Democracy, December 4, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/R9rzX 90Ben Jervey. โ€œTrump Energy Agenda Revealed in Thomas Pyle Memo,โ€ DeSmog, December 7, 2016.

  • Withdrawing from the 2015 Paris Climate agreement;
  • Increasing federal oil and natural gas leasing;
  • Lifting the coal lease moratorium;
  • Eliminating the Clean Power Plan;
  • Expediting approvals of LNG export terminals;
  • Moving forward with pipeline projects including the Keystone XL and Dakota Access Pipeline;
  • Rolling back federal fuel economy standards;
  • Ending the use of the social cost of carbon in agency rulemaking; and
  • Reconsidering the โ€œendangerment findingโ€ that found greenhouse gases to be a threat to public health and welfare.

June 13, 2016

The Center for Media and Democracy (CMD/PRWatch) reports the American Energy Alliance (AEA)  was named as a creditor in Peabody Energy’s recent bankruptcy filings.91Nick Surgey. โ€œPeabody Coal Bankruptcy Reveals Climate Denial Network Funding,โ€ PRWatch, June 13, 2016. Archived June 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/a73wj

While the available bankruptcy documents do not list the scale or dates of funding, they outline Peabody Energy’s financial ties to a large network of groups promoting climate change denial.92โ€œIn re: Peabody Energy Corporation, et al. Debtors,โ€ United States Bankruptcy Court Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division,  Case 16-42529, May 27, 2016. Retrieved from DocumentCloud.

Prominent individuals appearing in the documents include climate deniers Willie SoonRichard LindzenRoy Spencer and Richard Berman. The long list of organizations also includes groups such as Americans for ProsperityAmerican Legislative Exchange CouncilCFACTInstitute for Energy ResearchState Policy Network, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and dozens more.93Farron Cousins. โ€œCourt Documents Show Coal Giant Peabody Energy Funded Dozens Of Climate Denial Groups,โ€ DeSmog, June 13, 2016.

The Guardian also analysed and reported on the Peabody bankruptcy findings94Suzanne Goldenberg and Helena Bengtsson. โ€œBiggest US coal company funded dozens of groups questioning climate change,โ€ The Guardian, June 13, 2016. Archived June 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/pw7On

โ€œThese groups collectively are the heart and soul of climate denial,โ€ said Kert Davies, founder of the Climate Investigation Center, who has spent 20 years tracking funding for climate denial. โ€œItโ€™s the broadest list I have seen of one company funding so many nodes in the denial machine.โ€

The companyโ€™s filings reveal funding for a range of organisations which have fought Barack Obamaโ€™s plans to cut greenhouse gas emissions, and denied the very existence of climate change. [โ€ฆ]

Among Peabodyโ€™s beneficiaries, the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change has insisted โ€“ wrongly โ€“ that carbon emissions are not a threat but โ€œthe elixir of lifeโ€ while the American Legislative Exchange Council is trying to overturn Environmental Protection Agency rules cutting emissions from power plants. Meanwhile, Americans for Prosperity campaigns against carbon pricing. The Oklahoma chapter was on the list. [โ€ฆ]

โ€œThe breadth of the groups with financial ties to Peabody is extraordinary. Thinktanks, litigation groups, climate scientists, political organisations, dozens of organisations blocking action on climate all receiving funding from the coal industry,โ€ said Nick Surgey, director of research for the Center for Media and Democracy.

โ€œWe expected to see some denial money, but it looks like Peabody is the treasury for a very substantial part of the climate denial movement.โ€

Notable organizations listed in the initial documents include:

Notable individuals named in the initial documents include the following:

May 2016

The American Energy Alliance is part of a coalition of 60 conservative organizations led by Americans for Prosperity claiming that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) ozone rule will cost jobs and hurt the U.S. economy.95Asha Glover. โ€œAFP-Led Coalition Says EPA Ozone Regulation Will Kill Economy,โ€ Morning Consult, May 9, 2016. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/CyQMl

โ€œThe only way EPA could justify the regulation was to use questionable cobenefits,โ€ a letter addressed to House Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and Senate Environment and Public Works Chairman James Inhofe (R-Okla.) read. โ€œIn reducing ozone, there may also be benefits from reductions of other pollutants, in this case particulate matter (PM). However, the EPA already has another set of regulations dealing exclusively with PM. Either the EPA has woefully inadequate standards for PM or it is effectively โ€˜double countingโ€™ the health benefits of PM reductions to justify the ozone regulation.โ€96Asha Glover. โ€œAFP-Led Coalition Says EPA Ozone Regulation Will Kill Economy,โ€ Morning Consult, May 9, 2016. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/CyQMl

April 2016

The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) reports that the American Energy Alliance is one of several Koch-funded groups including the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and the State Policy Network (SPN) working to โ€œstymie the Clean Power Plan,โ€ President Obama’s signature effort to cut carbon pollution from power plants.97Aliya Haq. โ€œKoch Brothers Struggling to Block Climate Action in State Legislatures,โ€ NRDC, May 3, 2016. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/x5tFd

In April, 2016, the American Energy Alliance itself declared that it was behind the push in state legislatures in the US to bar funding for work on the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan.98Elizabeth Harball. โ€œCLEAN POWER PLAN:Conservative groups claim responsibility for state budget restrictions,โ€ E&E Publishing, April 28, 2016. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/iSLmN

โ€œThe point of these riders is to restrict the agency from putting time and attention into this regulation,โ€ said Hubbel Relat, vice president for state policy and general counsel for AEA. โ€œThese budget riders exist in the first place because the governors insist on moving forward on a regulation that is held up in litigation and the Supreme Court has questioned its legality.โ€99Elizabeth Harball. โ€œCLEAN POWER PLAN:Conservative groups claim responsibility for state budget restrictions,โ€ E&E Publishing, April 28, 2016. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/iSLmN

September 1, 2015

American Energy Alliance President Thomas Pyle issued a statement criticizing Michigan’s Governor Richard Dale Snyder for his plan to implement EPA carbon regulations:100โ€œGov. Snyder Surrenders to Obamaโ€™s EPA,โ€ Energy Townhall (AEA Publication), September 1, 2015. Archived May 21, 2015. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/tjntJ

โ€œThe Snyder administrationโ€™s decision to wave the white flag and implement EPAโ€™s carbon regulation is bad news for Michigan families. The governor claims this approach โ€˜retains controlโ€™ for Michigan, yet the opposite is true. Implementing this regulation, when serious legal challenges persist, effectively hands over the keys to Michiganโ€™s energy future to unelected bureaucrats in Washington. Once Gov. Snyder signs away Michiganโ€™s control over its energy future to Obamaโ€™s EPA, there is no turning back.

โ€œObama and EPA want states to think their only choices are to submit a state plan or have a federal plan imposed on them. Gov. Snyder has apparently fallen for this false choice. The real choice is between shielding Michigan from this harmful carbon regulation or helping President Obama carry it across the finish line as the sun sets on his presidency.

โ€œObamaโ€™s carbon regulation is a national energy tax that will burden Michiganders, especially the poor, with higher energy prices and fewer jobs, yet will have no impact on climate change. Michigan voters made clear their stance on higher energy taxes when they overwhelmingly rejected Governor Snyderโ€™s gas tax proposal earlier this year. The governor should listen to the citizens in his state and join the ranks of several of his fellow governors by rejecting the Obama administrationโ€™s carbon regulation.โ€101โ€œGov. Snyder Surrenders to Obamaโ€™s EPA,โ€ Energy Townhall (AEA Publication), September 1, 2015. Archived May 21, 2015. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/tjntJ

August 6, 2015

AEA President Thomas Pyle published an article in Medium responding to a previous post by EPA Chief Gina McCarthy โ€œwith his own six reasons as to why states and the American people should be wary of entrusting EPA with their energy futures.โ€102โ€œSix Things Every American Should Really Know About EPAโ€™s Carbon Agenda,โ€ Energy Townhall (AEA Publication), July 12, 2015. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/LllJS

Pyle contends in his article that the EPA‘s power plan, which he entitles a โ€œcarbon agendaโ€ will have โ€œno impact on climate change,โ€ will โ€œ[hurt] Americans’ health,โ€ โ€œrelies on threats and bribes,โ€ and โ€œwas written by the environmental lobby,โ€ among other criticisms.103Tom Pyle. โ€œSix Things Every American Should Really Know About EPAโ€™s Carbon Agenda,โ€ Medium, August 6, 2015. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/v8Drs

August 3, 2015

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement criticizing President Obama’s Clean Power Plan:104(Press Release). โ€œObamaโ€™s Carbon Rule Still a Bad Deal for Americans,โ€ Energy Townhall (AEA Publication), July 3, 2015. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/2mFW7

โ€œThe final version of President Obamaโ€™s โ€˜Clean Power Planโ€™ is somehow more harmful than the proposed rule. It forces states to make even steeper cuts, it guts natural gas in favor of costly renewables, and it still has no effect on climate change. While the EPA touts these adjustments to the rule as a sign of โ€˜flexibilityโ€™, itโ€™s really an admission that Obama needs states to do his dirty work. But state leaders shouldnโ€™t give in to the administrationโ€™s bribery schemes. Regardless of these cosmetic changes to the rule, the fundamental flaws remain.

โ€œItโ€™s important to remember that President Obamaโ€™s carbon regulation, the crown jewel of his climate legacy, has no impact on climate change. EPAโ€™s own models show that their carbon rule will limit global temperature rise by a mere 0.018 degrees Celsius by 2100. Thatโ€™s a bad deal for the American people. State leaders should protect their citizens from Obamaโ€™s costly carbon rule by refusing to submit a plan.โ€

July 30, 2015

The American Energy Alliance launched a new initiative at SmartPowerPlan.org, which it describes as โ€œa hub for the latest information on how states and the public are fighting back against the EPAโ€™s so-called Clean Power Plan.โ€ AEA calls it a โ€œone-stop shopโ€ for โ€œthe latest news, legal analysis, public comments, and state action against the EPAโ€™s carbon rule.โ€105โ€œMounting Opposition to EPAโ€™s Carbon Rule,โ€ Energy Townhall (AEA Publication), July 30, 2015. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/4ysOl

According to WHOIS archives, the American Energy Alliance registered the website smartpowerplan.org on May 12, 2015.106Whois Record for SmartPowerPlan.org, whois.domaintools.com. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

According to their website, the Smart Power Plan consists of three principles that โ€œthat should guide both elected officials and regulators when composing energy policyโ€:107โ€œAbout this Effort,โ€ Smart Power Plan. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/07KHU

โ€œ1. Make Americansโ€™ Lives Better Not Harder: We support individuals picking the most reliable, abundant, and affordable energy sources free from government interference. Natural gas, oil, and coal, which account for two-thirds of our electricity, enrich our lives and allow families to spend more of their hard-earned income on health care, housing, education, and their pursuit of happiness. We embrace individual choice over government mandates.

โ€œ2. Base Policy Decisions on Science and Common Sense: Any public policy that creates new burdens on individuals and families should be subject to rigorous scrutiny that measures the full range of costs and benefits. Unfortunately, the EPAโ€™s Carbon rule fails this basic test. The claimed benefits used to justify the rule are based on dubious science, while the huge costs will diminish Americansโ€™ health, wealth, and environment.

โ€œ3. Hold Our Elected Officials Accountable: Our foremost concern is that states, individuals, and markets drive U.S. energy policy. Increasingly, regulators at federal agencies like the EPA have co-opted the decision-making power and circumvented the legislative process. We need binding action from our elected officials to preserve the authority of states over any significant energy tax hikes and new mandates on their statesโ€™ residents.โ€

February 2015

The AEA began publishing articles linking back to an โ€œinitiativeโ€ titled โ€œDivestment Truthโ€ (#DivestmentTruth). AEA argues that a โ€œmorally bankrupt movement is trying to keep billions of people in poverty, deny people access to energy, and forbid access to the lifesaving products that come from coal, natural gas, and oil [โ€ฆ]โ€ and asks readers to โ€œHelp us fight against this misguided movement, and take back the reliable, affordable energy that drives America forward.โ€108โ€œDivestment Truth: What is Fossil Fuel Divestment?โ€ American Energy Alliance. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/HrFim

Publications filed under Divestment Truth include a June, 2015 op-ed in Forbes by Institute for Energy Research Founder and CEO Robert Bradley Jr. titled โ€œFossil Fuel Divestment: Flight From Reality.โ€ According to Bradley, โ€œDivestment is a solution looking for a problem. It is destined to fail [โ€ฆ].โ€109โ€œOpinion: Fossil Fuel Divestment: Flight From Reality,โ€ American Energy Alliance, June 16, 2015. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/RShpi

AEA also published a political cartoon depicting a โ€œfossil fuel divestment protestorโ€ with and without fossil fuels which was also shared on social media.110โ€œNo shirt, no shoes, no fossil fuels,โ€ Energy Townhall (AEA Publication), February 13, 2015. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/lGfRq

According to AEA, โ€œThe fossil fuel divestment movement [โ€ฆ] has it backwards. The morally superior choice is for people to be free to use energy to make their lives better. Today, that means having access to the abundant energy resources of coal, oil, and natural gas. Those are the technologies that lifted the developed world out of poverty, and they continue to lift millions out of poverty while they power the high-energy lives of those of us fortunate enough to live in the developed world.โ€111โ€œWhat is the Fossil Fuel Divestment Movement?โ€ American Energy Alliance, February 5, 2016. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/JDkmB

November 4, 2015

AEA released โ€œ10 Reasons to Oppose a Carbon Taxโ€ on its Energy Townhall publication. According to AEA, โ€œA carbon tax would impose an indirect tax on [natural gas, oil, and coal] due to their carbon dioxide emissions.โ€ They list the following โ€œten reasonsโ€ they believe a carbon tax should be opposed112:โ€œ10 Reasons to Oppose a Carbon Tax,โ€ Energy Townhall (AEA Publication), November 4, 2015. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/e7yIU

โ€œ1). It is a tax on transportation fuels like gasoline and most forms of electricity
2). It will increase the cost of goods and services 
3). It disproportionately hurts low income communities and seniors
4). It damages American economic competitiveness
5). It may increase air pollution
6). It does not impact climate change
7). It is not a market-driven solution
8). It is a tool for politicians to continue wasteful government spending
9). It is not ‘revenue-neutral’
10). The American public is opposed to itโ€

November 21, 2014

AEA President Thomas Pyle published an op-ed in the Las Vegas Review-Journal titled โ€œIt’s time for wind tax credit to get blown away.โ€ Some excepts below:113โ€œICYMI: Itโ€™s Time for the Wind PTC to Blow Away,โ€ Energy Townhall, November 21, 2014. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/e7yIU

โ€œOne of the central building blocks of the EPAโ€™s power plant rule is increased use of wind and solar for electricity generation. But wind and solar are uncompetitive without massive taxpayer subsidies and mandated renewable portfolio standards. For wind, that takes the form of the production tax credit. [โ€ฆ]

โ€œCongress should reject any attempt by [Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid to revive the wind production tax credit in the lame-duck session. Itโ€™s clearly a bad deal for Nevadans, enriching out-of-state billionaires at the expense of working families.โ€

September 2014

The American Energy Alliance wrote a coalition letter, signed by 20 organizations, to congress claiming widespread support for โ€œThe PTC Elimination Actโ€, which would cut subsidies for wind energy production, Huffington Post reports.114Gabe Elsner. โ€œAmerican Energy Alliance Leads Front Group Attack on Wind PTC,โ€ Huffington Post, September 3, 2015. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/LC1ML

The Energy and Policy Institute examined the signatories list and found that 18 of the signatories had signed a similar letter for the Koch-funded Americans for Prosperity in June of 201, and that 14 have ties to fossil fuel funders, and 18 have ties to the Koch Brothers’ political network.115Gabe Elsner. โ€œAmerican Energy Alliance Leads Front Group Attack on Wind PTC,โ€ Huffington Post, September 3, 2015. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/LC1ML

May 2014

The American Energy Alliance spent over $400,000 on television ads attacking Senator Mark Udall and accusing him of opposing construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. Video below.116Laura Barron-Lopez. โ€œAd targets Sen. Udall as anti-Keystone pipeline,โ€ The Hill, May 14, 2014. Archived May 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/yV7V5

โ€œThe simple truth: Americans needs jobs,โ€ the narrator reads. โ€œAnd the Keystone pipeline will create thousands of high-paying jobs.โ€

โ€œSen. Mark Udall is siding with Washington lobbyists and special interests to kill it,โ€ the ad states.

March 2012

The American Energy Alliance launched a $3.6 million ad campaign criticizing President Barack Obama on gasoline prices, and criticizes his decision on the Keystone XL Pipeline, Politico reports.117โ€œKochs linked to anti-Obama gas ads,โ€ Politico, March 29, 2012. Archived May 20, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/aMh7J

Politico notes that both the American Energy Alliance and IER are partly funded by the Koch brothers and their donor network. Democratic National Committee spokesman Brad Woodhouse accused the Koch brothers of โ€œfunding yet another shadowy outside group to defend the interests of Big Oil and protect their own tax breaks and profits with Mitt Romney being the ultimate beneficiary.โ€

Video from the AEI ad campaign below:

August 2009

The American Energy Alliance set off on a nation-wide campaign โ€œto smear President Barack Obamaโ€™s clean energy reform agenda,โ€ reported Thinkprogress. AEA staff rode in the โ€œAmerica Energy Expressโ€ bus, claiming that the American Clean Energy and Security act will โ€œcripple our sluggish economy.โ€118Brad Johnson. โ€œGOP Team At American Energy Alliance Runs โ€˜Energy Town Hallโ€™ Oil Bus Tour,โ€ ThinkProgress, August 22, 2009. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/5zmlW

September, 2008

The American Energy Alliance funded pro-drilling radio ads in Colorado, including one criticizing Colorado Democratic Senate candidate Mark Udall, NPR reports.119Will Evans. โ€œNew Group Tied To Oil Industry Runs Ads Promoting Drilling, Attacking Democrat,โ€ NPR, September 22, 2008. Archived May 21, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/cRZqN

American Energy Alliance Contact & Location

As of May, 2016, the American Energy Alliance listed the following contact information on their website:120โ€œContact,โ€ American Energy Alliance. Archived May 22, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/3Vfcx

American Energy Alliance
1155 15th Street NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005

Phone:  202.621.2940
Fax: 202.741.9170
Email:  [email protected]

Media Contact: Christopher Warren | 202.621.2947 | [email protected]

Social Media

Other Resources

Resources

Related Profiles

Western Energy Alliance (WEA) Background The Western Energy Alliance (WEA) represents over 300 member companies โ€œengaged in all aspects of environmentally responsible exploration and product...
Institute for Energy Research (IER) Background The Institute for Energy Research (IER) is a not-for-profit organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that โ€œconducts in...
American Petroleum Institute (API) Background Based in Washington DC, the American Petroleum Institute (API) is the largest trade association for the oil and gas industry, representing over ...
Thomas Pyle Credentials Pyle holds a B.A. in Political Science from the University of Southern California. โ€œTom Pyle Bioโ€ (PDF), Institute for Energy Research. Archived .pdf on file at Desm...