Jay H. Lehr

Jay H.ย Lehr (Deceased)

Credentialsย 

  • Ph.D., Ground Water Hydrology. University of Arizona (1962)1.โ€œDr. Jay H. Lehr,โ€ The Encyclopedia of Water. Archived August 8,ย 2008.
  • Degree in Geological Engineering from Princeton University.2โ€œDr. Jay H. Lehr,โ€ The Encyclopedia of Water. Archived August 8,ย 2008.

Background

Jay H. Lehr was a senior fellow3Jay Lehr (1938 โ€“ 2023),” The Heartland Institute. Archived January 17, 2023. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/jY7yc and former โ€œScience Directorโ€4โ€œPolicy Expertsย &ย Staff,โ€ The Heartland Institute. Archived October 4,ย 2008. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/aR73d of the Heartland Institute. He was editor of โ€œRational Readings of Environmental Concerns,โ€ which labeled environmentalists as โ€œextremistsโ€ and โ€œalarmists.โ€ He testified before Congress numerous times on environmentalย issues. Lehr passed away on January 10, 2023.5Jay Lehr (1938 โ€“ 2023),” The Heartland Institute. Archived January 17, 2023. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/jY7yc

Dr. Lehr’s experience is in groundwater hydrology. He received the nation’s first Ph.D. in Groundwater Hydrology from the University of Arizona and later became the executive director of the National Association of Groundwater Scientists and Engineers.6โ€œPolicy Expertsย &ย Staff,โ€ The Heartland Institute. Archived October 4,ย 2008. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/aR73d

Jay Lehr, who has called the EPA โ€œFraudulentโ€ in its estimates of how pollution poses hazards to human health, was himself convicted and sentenced to six months in prison for defrauding the EPA, reports Connor Gibson of Polluterwatch.7Connor Gibson. โ€œHeartland’s Jay Lehr callsย EPAย ‘Fraudulent,’ Despite Defraudingย EPAย and Going to Jail,โ€ DeSmog (Crossposted from Polluterwatch), September 4,ย 2014.

According to archived tobacco industry documents, Jay Lehr was among โ€œTASSC member scientistsโ€ who helped The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition (TASSC) draft its โ€œFive Guiding Scientific Principlesโ€ document.8โ€œTASSCย ISSUESย 5ย GUIDINGย SCIENTIFICย PRINCIPLES,โ€ Advancement of Sound Science Coalition, August 25, 2000. Retrieved from Truth Tobacco Industry Documents Library. Bates No.ย 90204222-190204224. TASSC began as an astroturf group for Philip Morris Tobacco, working as a โ€œnational coalition intended to educate the media, public officials and the public about the dangers of ‘junk science’โ€ and toย โ€œlink the tobacco issue with other more ‘politically correct’ productsโ€; and to associate scientific studies that cast smoking in a bad light with โ€œbroader questions about government research and regulationsโ€ – such as โ€œglobal warmingโ€, โ€œnuclear waste disposalโ€ and โ€œbiotechnology, according to memos from the PR firm APCO to Philip Morris in 1993.9George Monbiot. โ€œThe Denial Industry,โ€ย The Guardian, September 19, 2006.ย Archived March 22, 2016.

Stance on Climateย Change

Novemberย 2018

In testimony before New York City Council, Lehr respondedย to a questionย from Costa G. Constantinides:10โ€œHeartland’s Jay Lehr Testifies to New York City Council on Sea Level Rise,โ€ YouTube video uploaded by user โ€œThe Heartland Institute,โ€ November 2, 2018. Archived .mp4 on file atย DeSmog.

Constantinides:ย  โ€œSo you do not believe that climate change is manmade and do not believe we’re contributing atย all?’โ€

Lehr: โ€œAbsolutelyย notโ€

Later clarifying, Lehr suggested a period of global cooling isย imminent:

โ€œIn 20 years[โ€ฆ]ย in New York City, we’ll be making some resilient adjustments to the fact that, probably, we will be entering a period of global cooling as a result of the fact that the sun spots are at a very low point, and we could probably look forward in 20 years to, ah, maybe a degree and a half Fahrenheit cooler and we’ll manage. We’reย resilient.โ€

With regards to Constantinides’ differing stance on climate change, Lehr added:ย โ€œThere’s no chance of you being right and me being wrong. [โ€ฆ] Not on climate change. No chance at all. And I hope we all live long enough to seeย it.โ€

Lehr also described it as โ€œarrogantโ€ to think we could have an influence on climate or extreme weatherย events:

โ€œIt’s arrogant to think [increases in 100-year storms]ย are manmade because nature is so overwhelming compared to what the impact that weย have.โ€

April 4,ย 2006

In a letter to the Editor in the Chicago Sun Times, Lehr wrote:11โ€œAlarmism Undermines Sound Policyโ€ย (Letter to the Editor in theย Chicago Sun Times).ย The Heartland Institute, April 4, 2006. Archived November 25,ย 2006.

โ€œThe media willfully ignores thousands of scientists who believe in global warming but do not believe its effects will be ‘catastrophic.’ The only global warming catastrophes are going to be bad public policies based on fear and panic rather than caution and science.โ€12โ€œAlarmism Undermines Sound Policyโ€ย (Letter to the Editor in theย Chicago Sun Times).ย The Heartland Institute, April 4, 2006. Archived November 25,ย 2006.

Keyย Quotes

Lehr testified beforeย New York City Council to โ€œpush back at the notion the Big Apple will be underwater soon due to man-caused climate change.โ€ Some notable quotes below:13โ€œHeartland’s Jay Lehr Testifies to New York City Council on Sea Level Rise,โ€ YouTube video uploaded by user โ€œThe Heartland Institute,โ€ November 2, 2018. Archived .mp4 on file atย DeSmog.

Jay Lehr: [05:37]ย  โ€œIt’s interesting that everybody here is so worried about increasing sea level rise when the national oceanographic and atmospheric agency has the best record on the planet, right here at Battery Park, 160 years, which shows no increase in the rate of sea level rise. While the increase in carbon dioxide has been 30 percent over the last 40 years, the rate of sea level rise in the metropolitan area has not changed at all. And they’re predicting it will not change.ย [โ€ฆ]โ€

Costa Constantinides: [06:54]ย โ€So you’re telling me that the New York City panel on climate change has completely got this wrong, that everyone in this room has somehow gotten this wrong today,ย thatโ€ฆโ€

Jay Lehr: [07:01]ย โ€œI am,ย definitely.โ€

Costa Constantinides:ย [07:02]ย ย  ย Let me finish my train of thought. So the middle range that they show, um, or about the lower estimate is 15 inches. The high estimate is 75 inches. So you’re telling us we’re nowhere near any ofย that.

Jay Lehr: [07:22]ย โ€œCosta, I am saying exactly that. [โ€ฆ]ย  You’re nowhere near that, and you’re ignoring our own government agency. NOAA is as an outstanding agency, you’re, you’re ignoring, uh, a very liberal president that thought climate change was a problem. Who directed NOAA to really double their efforts in collecting data and the data they collected does not at all support your view of climate change, but we’re not talking about carbonย dioxide.โ€

Costa Constantinides: [07:49] โ€œSo let’s talk about that. So I see that that you have put up publications recently: Why the UN climate report cannot beย trusted?โ€

Jay Lehr: [07:55]ย โ€œAbsolutely.โ€

Costa Constantinides: [07:56]ย ย โ€œHow Al Gore built the global warmingย fraud?โ€

Jay Lehr: [07:59]ย ย โ€œThat’sย correct.โ€

Costa Constantinides: [08:00]ย ย โ€œSoโ€ฆโ€

Jay Lehr:ย  [08:01] โ€œI am the author of thoseย documents.โ€

Costa Constantinides:ย [08:02]ย  โ€œYou are the author of those documents. So you do not believe that climate change is manmade and do not believe we’re contributing atย all?โ€

Jay Lehr:ย  [08:08]ย ย ย  โ€œAbsolutelyย not.โ€

Costa Constantinides:ย [08:13 ]ย  ย โ€œAnd we’re all somehow wrong and somehow you’re the one that got itย right?โ€

Jay Lehr: [08:17]ย โ€œYou’re wrong only because you’re not looking at real science. And I flew here just to be one voice of scientific reason rather thanย emotion.โ€

Costa Constantinides:ย ย [08:27] โ€œOkay? So noย note from the crowd please. We want to keep some level of decorum. Um, so, uh, where does the Heartland institute get its fundingย from?โ€

Jay Lehr:ย [08:37]ย โ€œUh, individuals. We’re a very small organization. We get no money from oil companies or largeย corp[orations]โ€ฆโ€

Costa Constantinides:ย [08:43]ย ย ย โ€œNo money from ExxonMobil atย all?โ€

Jay Lehr: [08:45] โ€œNot In the last 15โ€ฆ I’ve been there 25 years. I would say not in the lastย 20โ€ฆโ€

Costa Constantinides:ย  [08:47]ย ย :So the Guardian article that exposed ExxonMobil as a big funder and the Mercerย Family was completelyย wrong?โ€

Jay Lehr:ย [08:56]ย ย  โ€œNothing from ExxonMobil for sure. I don’t know anything about funding from the Mercer Family and I don’t think they’re in the oil business.โ€

Costa Constantinides: [09:02]ย โ€œOh, no, they’re not in the old business, but they are a large climateย denier.โ€

Jay Lehr:ย [09:05]ย โ€œWe have a budget of six and a half million dollars a year. About 80 percent of it comes from individual, smallย donations.โ€

Costa Constantinides:ย ย  ย 09:12ย ย โ€œIndividual, smallย donationsโ€ฆโ€

Jay Lehr:ย  [09:13]ย โ€Individuals. Smallโ€ฆ we are not a mouthpiece for anyย corporation.โ€

Costa Constantinides: [09:17]ย  ย ย โ€œReally?โ€

Jay Lehr:ย [09:18]ย  โ€œYea,ย really.โ€

Costa Constantinides: [09:19] โ€œYou say that with a straightย face?โ€

Jay Lehr:ย ย [09:19]ย ย โ€œAh, easilyโ€ฆ We turned down money from the Koch Foundation because they wanted to run our organization; We don’t do that. Basically we’re a free market organization that wants to seekโ€ฆTo keep government out of our pocket books and look at things objectively rather thanย emotionally.โ€

Costa Constantinides:ย [09:37]ย  โ€œGovernment out of your pocket booksย how?โ€

Jay Lehr:ย [09:39] โ€œUh, individualย freedom.โ€

Costa Constantinides:ย ย  ย 09:41ย ย  ย โ€œIndividualย freedom.โ€

Jay Lehr:ย  [09:44]ย  โ€œWe’re a libertarianย organization.โ€

Costa Constantinides:ย [09:46]ย โ€œAh, ok. So if, if, if things do, if somehow our view is right in your view is wrong. And so, but then there isn’t an economy, but you’re okay withย that?โ€

Jay Lehr: [09:54]ย โ€œNo, I’m not okay with that. There’s no chance of you being right and me beingย wrong.โ€

Costa Constantinides: [09:58]ย ย โ€œReally?โ€

Jay Lehr:ย [09:58] โ€œReally. Not on climate change. No chance at all. And I hope we all live long enough to see it. Inย factโ€ฆโ€

Costa Constantinides: [10:04] โ€œAs do I. I’ve got an eight year old son who will be veryย impactedโ€ฆโ€

Jay Lehr: [10:07] โ€œIn 20 years, 20 years in New York City, we’ll be making some resilient adjustments to the fact that, probably, we will be entering a period of global cooling as a result of the fact that the sun spots are at a very low point, and we could probably look forward in 20 years to, ah, maybe a degree and a half Fahrenheit cooler and we’ll manage. We’re resilient. You’ve proved your resilience in this room. I’m, I’m absolutely astounded of all the terrific things you’re doing for the citizens of New York with regard to protecting against storm surges and the like. It just isn’t about seaย level.โ€

Costa Constantinides: [10:43]ย ย โ€œSo all these 100 year storms that keep blowing through in different parts of the world are of no consequence? They’reย justโ€ฆโ€

Jay Lehr: [10:49]ย  โ€œThey’re not manmade, that’s forย sure.โ€

Costa Constantinides: [10:51]ย  โ€œThey’re notย manmade?โ€

Jay Lehr:ย [10:51]ย โ€œNo.โ€

Costa Constantinides:ย  [10:52]ย โ€œNothing?โ€

Jay Lehr:ย [10:52] โ€œNo. It’s arrogant to think they are manmade because nature is so overwhelming compared to what the impact that we have. You can change a microclimate. In Phoenix, Arizona, people used to go there, uh, when they had breathing problems before they built 125 golf courses and irrigated them clean. Phoenix, Arizona is no longer so dry. You impact small areas, but you can’t impact the planet atย all.โ€

Costa Constantinides: [11:20]ย โ€œAnd the other 99 percent of scientists who believeย thatโ€ฆ?โ€

Jay Lehr:ย [11:23] โ€œThat isn’t true at all. That ninety-nine percent, ninety-seven [percent], that’s ridiculous. That’s ridiculous. Ninety seven percent of nobody agrees with everything. We have aโ€ฆ We sent out a, a statement to 33,000 scientists that all said, uh, you know, man-caused global warming is ridiculous. And it is ridiculous.โ€

Januaryย 31,ย 2018

Following President Donald Trump‘s State of the Union Address,ย Lehrย said in a statement:14โ€œPRESSย RELEASE:ย HEARTLANDย INSTITUTEย EXPERTSย REACTย TOย PRESIDENTย TRUMPโ€™Sย STATEย OFย THEย UNIONย ADDRESS,โ€ย The Heartland Institute, January 31, 2018. Archived February 5, 2018. Archive.isย URL:ย https://archive.is/FeswS

โ€œOn Tuesday evening President Donald Trump delivered the finest State of The Union speech of my lifetime. After watching it a second time, I could not find a single sentence I would have changed. The special guests President Trump honored were extraordinary, bringing real tears to my eyes over and over again. ย They were all uncomfortable in the spotlight but understood the importance of their stories. ย While we know the radical liberal media will find some faults, all NPR could muster this morning was a disagreement with his plan for 1.8 million people brought to America as children. My expectations for President Trump and the future of the country have never beenย higher.

โ€œOne of the most thrilling aspects of the speech was the total absence of climate change hysteria. President Trumpโ€™s delivery was flawless, allowing each and every point to be understood and absorbed. ย Unlike past State of the Union speeches, President Trump did not step on some of his lines or bore the audience with a slow delivery. ย I am simply in awe of what I saw and heard lastย night.โ€

March 23,ย 2017

In a keynote presentation at the Heartland Institute’s Twelfth International Conference on Climate Change, Lehr repeated the common myth that CO2 couldn’t be the driver of global temperatures given its small percentage in the atmosphere:15โ€œJay Lehr,ย ICCC12ย (Keynote, Global Warming Briefing),โ€ย International Conferences on Climate Changeย . Archived .mp4 on file atย DeSmog.ย 

โ€œI mean, how impossible it is to think that that little, tiny bit [of CO2] controls the temperature of the planetโ€ฆ it’s absurd. It’s absolutely absurd,โ€ Lehrย said.

Heartland repurposed Lehr’s statements in a short video in February,ย 2018:

2017

Writing atย Breitbart, in an article titled โ€œThe Beginning of the End of EPA,โ€ย Jay H. Lehr declared:16โ€œJay H. Lehr: The Beginning of the End of EPA,โ€ Breitbart, January 23, 2017. Archived January 17, 2023. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/PIAmB

โ€œTrump and the GOP are saying, finally, what millions of people have been thinking for a long time: EPA has become the cause of, not the solution to, the nationโ€™s major environmental problems. Itโ€™s time to end EPA.โ€ย 

โ€œDismantling EPA is one part of a comprehensive set of reforms, many of them discussed by Trump and referred to in the GOP platform, to lighten the massive weight of government regulations on the American people. The nation needs a pro-energy, pro-environment, and pro-jobs agenda that recognizes the tremendous value of the natural resources under our feet.โ€

โ€œEPA has long outlived its usefulness. Letโ€™s return its powers to the states, where they belong.โ€

According to Lehr, ย โ€œBy the 1980s, nothing more needed to be done beyond monitoring our continuing success in cleaning up the environment. It was time to declare victory and go home.โ€

2011

Lehr was presented as an expert on Fox News’s โ€œHannityโ€ show to discuss the recent nuclear disaster in Japan. He concluded that โ€œI can tell you with the utmost confidence there will not be a health impact of anything that is going on at the Fukushima power plant.โ€17โ€œAre Fears of a Catastrophic Nuclear Meltdown in Japan Warranted?โ€ (Transcript), Fox News, March 14,ย 2011.

2008

In one of Lehr’s presentations, he suggests that โ€œglobal warming is the best thing to socialize the worldโ€:18โ€œClimate change – It`s about freedom – Jay Lehr,โ€ YouTube. Video uploaded by Bushvision, May 1,ย 2008.

Septemberย 1994

โ€œI am delighted with the early success TASSC is having โ€ฆ Perhaps TASSC is just the organization the media has long needed,โ€ Lehr wrote in an issue ofย The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition’s newsletter.19โ€œLetter from the Chairman,โ€ย The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition.ย September 1994. Retrieved from Truth Tobacco Documents Library. Bates No.ย 2048294493-2048294496.

Keyย Deeds

February 4,ย 2020

Jay Lehr co-authored an article with Tom Harris of the International Climate Science Coalition. Lehr and Harris argue there is โ€œoverwhelmingโ€ evidence against mankind’s influence on climate change.ย  In the article, the authors repeat common change myths. For example, the idea that becauseย CO2 is only a small part of the atmosphere that it is not important (see that debunked here):20โ€œWhy donโ€™t we hear more about the Sun and its impact on Climate Change?โ€ย America Out Loud,ย February 4, 2020. Archived February 11, 2020. Archive.phย URL:ย https://archive.ph/5lT5y

โ€œCarbon dioxide (CO2) comprises only .04% (.0004) of our atmosphere. There is only 1/10,000 more CO2ย in the atmosphere now than there was 260 years ago,โ€ they wrote.

Next, the authors claimed there has been no rise in global temperatures (another myth debunked at SkepticalScience, as well as the myth that El Nino is the cause):

โ€œThe fact that average temperatures did not rise much (other than during two naturally caused El Nino events) over the past two decades, during which about 1/3 of all human CO2ย has been emitted, indicates that CO2ย has no significant effect on real world temperatures.โ€

They claim that temperatures have been lower in the past when CO2 levels were higher, and suggest this is another reason to invalidate global warming (see that debunked):

โ€œThere have been times in history when CO2 levels were high and temperatures very low. And times in which CO2 levels were very low and temperatures very high. This negative correlation indicates that global warming argument fails again and the hypothesis of CO2 causing much real-world temperature change is almost certainly wrong.โ€

Finally, another myth, that climate models just aren’t good enough (See SkepticalScience’s summary of the reliability ofย models):

โ€œThe point is there are hundreds of variables that affect temperatures. The climate models that inform the alarmist argument use very few of them and, even for those, just guess at their influence.โ€

They conclude:

โ€œFor people who have studied climate change for over 40 years, like the senior author of this article, Dr. Jay Lehrโคit is frustrating to know that the evidence against mankind having any role in it, is overwhelming. Yet the public and the opposition believeย otherwise.โ€

Novemberย 2018

Lehr testified beforeย New York City Council to โ€œpush back at the notion the Big Apple will be underwater soon due to man-caused climate change.โ€ View the video below, via the Heartland Institute’s YouTube channel:21โ€œHeartland’s Jay Lehr Testifies to New York City Council on Sea Level Rise,โ€ YouTube video uploaded by user โ€œThe Heartland Institute,โ€ November 2, 2018. Archived .mp4 on file atย DeSmog.

November 2,ย 2018

In an opinion piece for Townhall.com, Lehr and Tom Harris of the International Climate Science Coalition claim that international efforts to curb manmade climate change are part of a global conspiracy theory to eliminate humanย freedom:

โ€œFor many of the entities driving the global warming debate, the goal has never been about climate. Their long-term goal is to unite the world under a single socialistic government in which there is no capitalism, no democracy, and, ultimately, no freedom.โ€22Jay Lehr. โ€œGlobal Warming Is Not Damaging Our World – The Global Warming Movement Is,โ€ย townhall.com, November 2, 2018. Archived November 12, 2018. Archive.isย URL:ย http://archive.is/DAT3g

Lehr and Harris assert complicity in this scheme by every major agency of the U.S. government with oversight of energy, environmental, and climate policy.23Jay Lehr. โ€œGlobal Warming Is Not Damaging Our World – The Global Warming Movement Is,โ€ย townhall.com, November 2, 2018. Archived November 12, 2018. Archive.isย URL:ย http://archive.is/DAT3g

The pair further alleges that proponents of the scientific consensus regarding climate change are attempting to subvert the U.S. Constitution by stifling counterfactual viewpoints:ย ย 

โ€œPersonal freedoms are declining as a result of the climate scare as well. Socialists are using global warming to attack freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.โ€24Jay Lehr. โ€œGlobal Warming Is Not Damaging Our World – The Global Warming Movement Is,โ€ย townhall.com, November 2, 2018. Archived November 12, 2018. Archive.isย URL:ย http://archive.is/DAT3g

October 19,ย 2018

Wrote an article titled โ€œHow Al Gore Built The Global Warming Fraudโ€ atย Climate Change Dispatchย with the International Climate Science Coalition’s Tom Harris.ย In the article, they conclude that โ€œessentially everything in Goreโ€™s climate change agenda is either wrong or highly misrepresented.โ€ They also stress that Will Happer needs to leverage hisย position in the Trump administration: โ€œNow that he is President Donald Trumpโ€™s Senior Scientist for the National Security Council, Dr. Happer needs to show there is no โ€œscientific consensusโ€ on these issues โ€ฆย ย to help end the dangerous mythology of dangerous man-made global warming.โ€ [84]

Augustย 7,ย 2018

Lehr spokeย at theย Heartland Institute‘s โ€œAmerica First Energy Conferenceโ€ (AFECย 2018) in New Orleans, Louisiana.25โ€œSpeakers,โ€ย America First Energy Conference 2018. Archived August 1, 2018. Archive.foย URL:ย https://archive.fo/mwtga

โ€œThe purpose of this event is to promote and expand energy freedom in the United States, as outlined in President Donald Trumpโ€™s bold America First Energy Plan, a proposal first released during the 2016 presidential campaign. The presidentโ€™s plan marks a decisive change in direction from the Obama administrationโ€™s ‘war on fossil fuels’ย and focus on the theory of catastrophic man-caused climate change,โ€ the conference descriptionย reads.26โ€œAbout,โ€ย America First Energy Conference 2018. Archived July 23, 2018. Archive.isย URL:ย https://archive.fo/E4Gnt

Lehr moderatedย a panel titled โ€œWhy CO2 Emissions Are Not Creating a Climate Crisis.โ€27โ€œJAYย LEHR,ย PH.D.,โ€ America First Energy Conference 2018. Archived August 1, 2018. Archiveย URL:ย https://archive.fo/ILVpz

Februaryย 4,ย 2018

Inย January 2018, more than 200 scientistsย endorsed an open letterย calling on the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) to remove climate change denierย Rebekah Mercerย from itsย board and toย โ€œend ties to anti-science propagandists and funders of climate science misinformation.โ€ย The New York Timesย reportedย that those among theย AMNHย letter calling for Mercer to step down wereย Michael E. Mann, director of the Earth System Science Center at Pennsylvania State University, and Katharine Hayhoe, director of the Climate Science Center at Texas Tech University.28Robin Pogrebin and Somini Sengupta. โ€œA Science Denier at the Natural History Museum? Scientists Rebel,โ€ย The New York Times, January 25, 2018.ย Archived February 13, 2018. Archive.isย URL:ย https://archive.is/tAIv4

Lehr was among aย group of climate change deniers who responded with their own open letter, calling for theย AMNHย โ€œnot to cave in to this pressure.โ€ The letter was signed by numerous individuals withย ties toย groups funded by theย Mercer Family Foundationย such asย Will Happerย of theย CO2ย CoalitionRichard Lindzen, a fellow at theย Cato InstituteCraig Idso, the chairman of theย Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change. There are a number of signatories affiliated with the Heartland Institute, which has received over $5.78 million from the Mercer Family Foundation since 2008.29Graham Readfearn. โ€œClimate Science Deniers Defend New Yorkโ€™s American Museum of Natural History From Calls to Drop Trustee Rebekah Mercer,โ€ย DeSmog,ย Februaryย 6,ย 2018.

Theย letter reads:30mnh18-feb4-petitionletter (PDFย – Untitled). Retrieved fromย Watts Up With That.

โ€œThe Earth has supported abundant life many times in the geological past when there were much higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. It is quite likely that future generations will benefit from the enrichment of Earthโ€™s atmosphere with moreย carbonย dioxide.

โ€œMake no mistake, the agitators are not defending science from quackery โ€” quiteย theย contrary!โ€

November 9,ย 2017

Lehr spoke at the Heartland Institute’s โ€œAmerica First Energy Conferenceโ€ at theย Marriott Hotel in Houston, Texas. His speech was titled โ€œThe Other Side of the Global Warming Storyโ€:31โ€œJAYย LEHR,โ€ย America First Energy Conference.ย Archived Novemberย 21, 2017. Archive.isย URL:ย https://archive.is/g6vgx

The event description read as follows:32โ€œAbout,โ€ America First Energy. Archived October 11, 2017. Archive.isย URL:ย https://archive.is/8bTTJ

โ€œAt the America First Energy Conference, we plan to examineโ€”one year and one day after Trumpโ€™s shocking Election Dayย victoryโ€”theย following:

โ€œWhere does Trumpโ€™s America First Energyย Planย stand?

โ€œHow much progress has been made in implementing it, and what remains toย beย done?

โ€œWhat scientific and economic evidence is there that the plan is putting the nation on the right path for economic growth, environmental protection, orย both?โ€33โ€œAbout,โ€ America First Energy. Archived October 11, 2017. Archive.isย URL:ย https://archive.is/8bTTJ

In a fundraising letter obtained by DeSmog,ย Fred Palmerย had promoted the event as having the goal toย โ€œreview the scientific and economic evidence that exposes the fraud inherent in the Obama-era regulation regimeโ€ while discussing โ€œthe overwhelming benefits of fossil fuels to us all.โ€34October 2017 Fundraising letter by Fred Palmer. Onย fileย atย Desmog.

Many of the other speakers have regularly spoken at the Heartland Institute’s past ICCCs. Notable speakers listed so far includeย Joe Bast, Fred Palmer,ย Roger Bezdek,ย H. Sterling Burnett,ย Hal Doiron,ย Paul Driessen,ย John Dale Dunn,ย Myron Ebell, Heartland’s new Presidentย Tim Huelskamp,ย Craig Idso,ย David Legates,ย Jay Lehr,ย Anthony Lupo,ย Ross McKitrick,ย Steve Milloy,ย Todd Myers,ย John Nothdurt,ย David Schnare, and numerous others.35โ€œSPEAKERS,โ€ย America First Energy.ย Archived October 10, 2017. Archive.isย URL:ย https://archive.is/OJWeX

Asย reported at theย Houston Chronicle,ย speakers notably included two Trump Administration officials:ย Richard W. Westerdaleย IIย of the State Department and Vincent DeVito of the Department of Interior.ย David Bernhardt, deputy secretary of the Interior Department, was also formerly listed as a Heartland conference speaker, but apparently withdrew.36James Osborne. โ€œTrump officials to appear at Houston event hosted by climate skeptics,โ€ย Houston Chronicle, November 2, 2017.ย Archived November 20, 2017. Archive.isย URL:ย https://archive.is/XPtYc

Scott Pruittย also addressed the conference in a recorded video, personally thanking Heartland for โ€œwhat you’re doing to advance energyโ€ and โ€œfor what you’re doing to advance natural resources.37โ€œScott Pruitt,โ€ย America First Energy Conference.ย Archived November 20, 2017. Archive.isย URL:ย https://archive.is/X4F6m

Theย Climate Investigations Centerย put up a parody of the America First Energy conference website, complete with profiles on the individual speakers and highlighting their corporate funding and ties to groups such as theย Cooler Heads Coalition (CHC).38โ€œAmerica First Energy Conference Stacked with Climate Change Deniers,โ€ย Climate Investigations Center, November 6, 2017.ย Archived November 20, 2017. Archive.isย URL:ย https://archive.is/mISrd

October 12,ย 2017

Lehr commented on President Donald Trump‘s appointment of Kathleen Hartnett-White asย chair of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), pending approval. Lehr was quoted in a October 13 Heartland Institute newsletter:39Steve Horn. โ€œTrump Names Climate Denier Kathleen Hartnett-White to Head White House Environmental Council,โ€ย DeSmog, Octoberย 13,ย 2017.

โ€œWe can all be sure that President Trumpโ€™s nomination of Kathleen Hartnett White to head the Council on Environmental Quality will prove to be a grand slam home run. Her experience in environmental protection and her knowledge of the nationโ€™s outstanding energy resources make her perfect for this era. Her book Fueling Freedom, which she coauthored with Stephen Moore[JH2] , shows an amazing depth of knowledge required to develop our energy resources while protecting our environment,โ€ Lehr said.40โ€œHeartland Institute Experts React to Trumpโ€™s Appointment of Kathleen Hartnett White forย CEQ,โ€ย The Heartland Institute. Archived newsletter .pdf on file atย DeSmog.

Hartnett-White has a history of representing fossil fuel interests. During her tenure as chair of theย Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), appointed by then-governor Rick Perry,ย the TCEQ was found toย โ€œnot consistently ensure violators are held accountable.โ€ According to a 2003 Texas State Audit,ย polluters โ€œoften have economic benefits that exceed their penalties, which could reduce their incentive to comply.โ€41โ€œAn Audit Report on The Commission on Environmental Qualityโ€™s Enforcement and Permitting Functions for Selected Programsโ€ (PDF), State Auditor’s Office,ย Decemberย 2003.

As head of theย CEQ, Hartnett-White would be in charge of coordinatingย interagency science, climate, and environmental policy and oversee things such as theย National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)ย review process and agency compliance with that law.42Steve Horn. โ€œTrump Names Climate Denier Kathleen Hartnett-White to Head White House Environmental Council,โ€ย DeSmog, Octoberย 13,ย 2017.

โ€œThoughย CEQย oversees theย NEPAย process, it remains unclear how seriously Hartnett-White will take theย NEPAย review process, for decades seen as a bedrock ofย U.S.ย environmental regulation sinceย NEPAย became law in 1970,โ€ย DeSmog’s Steve Horn reported.43Steve Horn. โ€œTrump Names Climate Denier Kathleen Hartnett-White to Head White House Environmental Council,โ€ย DeSmog, Octoberย 13,ย 2017.

March 23,ย 2017

Lehr was a speaker at the Heartland Institute‘s 12th International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC12). He appeared on a panelย titled โ€œClimate Politics and Policy:โ€44โ€œJAYย LEHR,โ€ Climateconference.heartland.org. Archived April 6, 2017. Archive.isย URL:ย https://archive.is/HUrqC

Lehr also gave a keynote โ€œGlobal Warming Briefingโ€ where he claimed that carbon dioxide couldn’t possibly be the driver of climate due to being a small percentage in the atmosphere (see this myth debunked at Skeptical Science). See Lehr’s ICCC12 PowerPoint here.45โ€œJay Lehr,ย ICCC12ย (Keynote, Global Warming Briefing),โ€ย International Conferences on Climate Changeย . Archived .mp4 on file atย DeSmog.ย 

February 23,ย 2017

Jay H. Lehr was a signatory of a petition (PDF) organized by Richard Lindzen of the Cato Institute urging President Donald Trump to pull the United States out of the United Nations international convention on climate change (UNFCCC).46โ€œPETITIONโ€ (PDF),ย February 23, 2017. Richard Lindzen.ย PDFย Archived atย DeSmog.

โ€œIn just a few weeks, more than 300 eminent scientists and other qualified individuals from around the world have signed the petition below,โ€ Lindzen wrote in the letter.47โ€œPETITIONโ€ (PDF),ย February 23, 2017. Richard Lindzen.ย PDFย Archived atย DeSmog.

DeSmog investigated the list, and found that only a small handful of the signatories could be considered โ€œeven remotely โ€˜qualifiedโ€™ or โ€˜eminentโ€™ โ€” but not in the field of climate science.โ€ The list included individuals โ€œinterested in climate,โ€ and one signatory who only identified as an โ€œemailer who wished to sign the petitionโ€ while some signers provided no affiliation or address whatsoever.48Graham Readfearn. โ€œClimate Science Denier Richard Lindzen’s List of 300 โ€œScientistsโ€ Sent to Trump Is the Usual Parade of Non-Experts,โ€ย DeSmog, February 27,ย 2017.

January 24,ย 2017

Writing atย Breitbart, Jay H. Lehr argued that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has outlives its usefulness:49โ€œJay H. Lehr: The Beginning of the End of EPA,โ€ Breitbart, January 23, 2017. Archived January 17, 2023. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/PIAmB

โ€œTrump and the GOP are saying, finally, what millions of people have been thinking for a long time: EPA has become the cause of, not the solution to, the nationโ€™s major environmental problems. Itโ€™s time to end EPA.โ€

According to Lehr, theย โ€EPA is now an obstacleโ€ that has been controlled by โ€œradical Leftistsโ€ who ย โ€œrealized they could advance their political agenda by taking over the environmental movement and use it to advocate for ever-more draconian regulations on businesses.โ€50โ€œJay H. Lehr: The Beginning of the End of EPA,โ€ Breitbart, January 23, 2017. Archived January 17, 2023. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/PIAmB

Before going on to cite a report by the conservative Heritage Foundation, Lehr adds that โ€œToday, EPA is a captive of activist and special-interest groups. Its regulations have nothing to do with protecting the environment.โ€51โ€œJay H. Lehr: The Beginning of the End of EPA,โ€ Breitbart, January 23, 2017. Archived January 17, 2023. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/PIAmB

Lehr advocates that โ€œThe solution is to return this authority to the states, replacing EPA with a Committee of the Whole of the 50 state environmental protection agencies.โ€52โ€œJay H. Lehr: The Beginning of the End of EPA,โ€ Breitbart, January 23, 2017. Archived January 17, 2023. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/PIAmB

โ€œDismantling EPA is one part of a comprehensive set of reforms, many of them discussed by Trump and referred to in the GOP platform, to lighten the massive weight of government regulations on the American people. The nation needs a pro-energy, pro-environment, and pro-jobs agenda that recognizes the tremendous value of the natural resources under our feet. [โ€ฆ] EPA has long outlived its usefulness. Letโ€™s return its powers to the states, where theyย belong.โ€

Augustย 2016

Jay Lehr is listed as a โ€œfounding memberโ€ ofย group named Climate Exit (Clexit)ย led by climate change denierย Christopher Monckton.53โ€œThe Clexit Committee comprisesโ€ (PDF), Clexit.net. Archived.pdfย onย fileย atย DeSmog.ย Accordingย toย Clexit’sย founding statement (PDF),ย โ€œThe world must abandon this suicidal Global Warming crusade. Man does not and cannot control the climate.โ€54โ€œAfter Brexit, Clexitโ€ (PDF), Clexit.net. Archived .pdfย onย fileย atย DeSmog.

Desmog reportedย on how the group grew in the wake of the UK‘s decision to leave the EU.55Graham Readfearn. โ€œAfter Brexit, Climate Science Denialists Form New Group to Call for a Clexit,โ€ย DeSmog,ย Augustย 3,ย 2016. A keyย member of Clexit’sย โ€œ60 well-informed science, business and economic leadersโ€ isย Hugh Morgan, a former board member of the Reserve Bank of Australia andย formerย CEOย of Western Mining Corporationย with close ties to Australia’s Liberal party.56โ€œHugh Morganย AO,โ€ Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Archived February 22, 2002. Archive.isย URL:ย https://archive.is/1ObOB

According toย Clexit’s foundingย statement:ย 

โ€œIf the Paris climate accord is ratified, or enforced locally by compliant governments, it will strangle the leading economies of the world with pointless carbon taxes and costly climate and energy policies, all with no sound basis in evidence or scienceย [โ€ฆ]โ€57โ€œAfter Brexit, Clexitโ€ (PDF), Clexit.net. Archived .pdfย onย fileย atย DeSmog.

June 13,ย 2016

Jay H. Lehr was quoted in the Heartland Institute‘s press release, โ€œHeartland Institute Experts React to U.S. House Passing Anti-Carbon Tax Resolution.โ€58โ€œHeartland Institute Experts React toย U.S.ย House Passing Anti-Carbon Tax Resolution,โ€ Heartland Institute, June 13, 2016. Archived June 23,ย 2016.

โ€œI have spent much of a half century studying and understanding this fact: Were our planet not blessed with carbon dioxide, life would not exist. It seems unfathomable that a group of intelligent people would want to limit our lifeโ€™sย blood.

โ€œWithout 150 parts per million of CO2 in our atmosphere, plants would perish โ€“ and man along with them. Before World War II, we were perilously close to having too little CO2 in the atmosphere. Now the industrial revolution has saved us, and hopefully we are on our way to 500 and 600 ppm, which the planet has exceeded for much of itsย history.

โ€œCarbon dioxide has no down sides. It increases green matter everywhere, including the yields of our crops, which are slowly reducing starvation in the world. And surely CO2โ€™s insignificant role as a greenhouse gas, when compared to water vapor, is not negatively impacting the temperature of our planet. It is surely time to end the insanity and defeat the idea of imposing a carbon tax.โ€59โ€œHeartland Institute Experts React toย U.S.ย House Passing Anti-Carbon Tax Resolution,โ€ Heartland Institute, June 13, 2016. Archived June 23,ย 2016.

Aprilย 2016

Jay H. Lehr and Jack Keeley edited a book titledย Alternative Energy and Shale Gas Encyclopedia, (Wileyโ€”April 25, 2016)ย described as a โ€œa comprehensive depository of all information relating to the scientific and technological aspects of the world’s energy.โ€60Jay H. Lehr and Jack Keeley.ย Alternative Energy and Shale Gas Encyclopediaย (Wileyโ€”April 25, 2016).ย ISBN:ย 978-0-470-89441-5.

The book is introduced by Howard Hayden, and features a chapter on shale gas by Heartland Institute โ€œexpertโ€ and research fellow Isaac Orr.61โ€œExpert: Isaac Orr,โ€ Heartland Institute. Archived May 10, 2016. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/FtdP1

June 11โ€“12,ย 2015

Jay Lehr was a speaker on Panel 4: โ€œEnergy Policy,โ€ at the Heartland Instituteโ€™s Tenth International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC10) in Washington, D.C., with Marlo Lewis and Isaac Orr.62โ€œSpeakers,โ€ Heartland Institute. Archived Juneย 30,ย 2015.

View Jay Lehrโ€™s Panel 4 presentation at the Heartland Instituteโ€™s ICCC10, below:63โ€œPanel 4: Energy Policy with Marlo Lewis, Jay Lehr, Ph.D., and Isaac Orr,โ€ Heartland Institute, June 11. Archived July,ย 2015.

Jay Lehr was a speaker on Panel 7: โ€œClimate Policy and National Security,โ€ at the Heartland Instituteโ€™s Tenth International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC10) in Washington, D.C., with James Taylor.64โ€œSpeakers,โ€ Heartland Institute. Archived Juneย 30,ย 2015.

View Jay Lehrโ€™s Panel 7 presentation at the Heartland Instituteโ€™s ICCC10, below:65โ€œPanel 7: Climate Policy and National Security with Capt. Donald K. โ€œDekeโ€ Forbes (USN, ret.), Jay Lehr, Ph.D., and James Taylor,โ€ Heartland Institute, June 11, 2015. Archived Julyย 20,ย 2015.

May 6,ย 2015

Jay Lehr provided a positive review forย Climate Change, The Facts in an article titled โ€œTop Climate Skeptics Captured in One Book: Review of Climate Change The Factsโ€ on the Heartland Institute’s publicationย Heartlander.

โ€œWhile there are dozens of excellent books exploding the man caused global warming myth, I believe no more need to be written after this single volume brilliantly put together by Alan Moran,โ€ Lehr said.66Jay Lehr. โ€œTop Climate Skeptics Captured in One Book: Review of Climate Change The Facts,โ€ย Heartlander, May 6,ย 2015. Archived October 23, 2015. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/r6DqP

Climate Change: The Facts isย published by theย Institute of Public Affairsย andย features โ€œ22 essays on the science, politics and economics of the climate change debate.โ€ The Institute of Public Affairs, while not revealing most of its funders, is known to have received funding from mining magnate Gina Rinehart and at least one major tobacco company.67โ€œInstitute of Public Affairs,โ€ SourceWatch. Accessed May 27,ย 2015.

The book includes essays and articles from a range of climate change skeptics, with contributers including theย following:

Marchย 2015

Jay Lehr was a guest on the Fox News Channel’sย Your World with Neil Cavuto where he discussed regulations on hydraulic fracturing. As reported in the Heartland Institute’s Blog Somewhat Reasonableย ,ย Lehr claims that studies showing fracking contaminates well water areย exaggerated:

โ€œWe fractured a million wells between the beginning and when the shale gas boom began and we really havenโ€™t proven that thereโ€™s been a single water supply contaminated.โ€68Donald Lendal. โ€œHeartland’s Jay Lehr Talks Fracking Regulations with Neil Cavuto,โ€ย Somewhat Reasonableย (Heartland Institute Blog). March 26,ย 2015. Archived December 18, 2015. Archive URL: https://archive.ph/Iuuxz

View a full report at Media Matters for America, and view the video coverage below.69Denise Robbins. โ€œFox’s Cavuto, Heartland’s Lehr In Denial About Fracking Pollution,โ€ย Media Matters for America. March 24,ย 2015.ย 

November 5,ย 2014

The Heartland Institute‘s โ€œenvironmental science and policy expertsโ€ published commentsย following the release of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) โ€œSynthesis Report,โ€ completing the IPCC‘s Fifth Assessment Report (AR5).Jay Lehr wrote it was โ€œclear that the shrill panic of the global warmers has worn thin on the common people in this nation.โ€70โ€œHeartland Institute Experts Comment on Latest United Nations Climate Report,โ€ Heartland Institute, November 5,ย 2014.

September 4, 2014

Jay Lehr was a guest on Fox News’s Stossel show, where he described the EPA as โ€œfraudulentโ€ in estimates of amounts of pollution that pose hazards to people’s health, such as particulate matter in coal pollution.71Connor Gibson. โ€œHeartland’s Jay Lehr callsย EPAย ‘Fraudulent,’ Despite Defraudingย EPAย and Going to Jail,โ€ DeSmog (Crossposted from Polluterwatch), September 4,ย 2014. 72โ€œMan Who Defraudedย EPAย Callsย EPAย ‘Fraudulent’ Onย FOX,โ€ Crooks and Liars, September 2,ย 2014.

Polluterwatch’s Connor Gibson noted that Jay Lehr himself had been sentenced toย six monthsโ€“serving threeโ€“in a minimum security federal prison back in 1991ย for fraud, and his organization at the time was fined over $200,000.73Connor Gibson. โ€œHeartland’s Jay Lehr callsย EPAย ‘Fraudulent,’ Despite Defraudingย EPAย and Going to Jail,โ€ DeSmog (Crossposted from Polluterwatch), September 4,ย 2014. 74Minnesota Ground Water Association Newsletter (PDF) Vol. 10, No. 3, October, 1991. p.11. Archived .pdf on file atย DeSmog. 75Minnesota Ground Water Association Newsletter (PDF) Vol. 10, No. 2, June, 1991. p.5. Archived .pdf on file atย DeSmog.

According to a Heartland Institute email advertising Lehr’s attendance on Stossel’s show, Mr. Lehr’s relevance in attacking the EPA comes from a Heartland report he wrote urging the agency to be โ€œsystematically dismantled.โ€76Connor Gibson. โ€œHeartland’s Jay Lehr callsย EPAย ‘Fraudulent,’ Despite Defraudingย EPAย and Going to Jail,โ€ DeSmog (Crossposted from Polluterwatch), September 4,ย 2014.

August 28,ย 2014

Jay Lehr appeared on the Stossel Show with John Stossel on Fox News, calling the Environmental Protection Agency โ€œfraudulent,โ€ despite having previously defrauded the EPA himself by โ€œfalsifying employee time sheets on a government contract,โ€ and serving a six month sentence and paying a $200,000 fine for it in 1991.77Connor Gibson. โ€œMan Who Defraudedย EPAย callsย EPAย โ€œFraudulentโ€ onย FOX,โ€ย PolluterWatch, August 29, 2014. Archived September 5,ย 2014.

Lehr contends that the EPA is โ€œfraudulentโ€ in its โ€œestimates of the amounts of pollution that pose hazards to peopleโ€™s health, such as particulate matter in coal pollution.โ€ Lehr states that none of the EPAโ€™s amendments since 1980 have been beneficial to our environment or human health and โ€œall they [EPA] do is ruin our economy.โ€78Connor Gibson. โ€œMan Who Defraudedย EPAย callsย EPAย โ€œFraudulentโ€ onย FOX,โ€ย PolluterWatch, August 29, 2014. Archived September 5,ย 2014.

When asked by Stossel if it would be a good idea to reduce carbon dioxide in the air, Lehr said it was โ€œabsurd to call carbon dioxide a pollutant โ€ฆ and it has given the US EPA an opportunity to run our lives.โ€ Lehr reiterated his stance to phase out the EPA in a five-year plan, which he detailed in his July, 2014 Policy Brief for the Heartland Institute titled โ€œReplacing the Environmental Protection Agency.โ€

July 2014

Jay Lehr, science director and senior fellow, writes a Policy Brief for the Heartland Institute entitled, โ€œReplacing the Environmental Protection Agency,โ€ which he describes in the abstract as a โ€œplan to replace the United States Environmental Protection Agency with a Committee of the Whole of the 50 state environmental protection agencies, utilizing a phased five-year transitionย period.โ€ย 

Within the Policy Brief, Lehr writes that the ten years following the establishment of the EPA in 1971 he โ€œhelped write a significant number of legislative bills that were to make up a true safety net for our environment,โ€ including, โ€œWater Pollution Control Act (later renamed the Clean Water Act), Safe Drinking Water Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (which, surprisingly, covered deep mines as well), Clean Air Act, Federal Insecticide, Rodenticide, and Fungicide Act, and Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (which we now know asย Superfund).โ€ย 

Following Lehrโ€™s ten-year period of legislative bill writing, he notes in the brief that โ€œaround 1981, liberal activist groups recognized EPA could be used to advance their political agenda by regulating virtually all human activities regardless of their impact on the environment โ€ฆ Since that time, not a single environmental law or regulation has been passed that benefitted either the environment or society โ€ฆ Today, EPA is all but a wholly owned subsidiary of liberal activistย groups.โ€

Lehr concludes the Policy Brief by writing โ€œitโ€™s time for the national EPA to go,โ€ and that โ€œthe path forward is now clear and simple: A five-year transition from a federal government bureaucracy to a Committee of the Whole composed of the 50 state environmental protection โ€ฆ All that is missing is the politicalย will.โ€ย 

March 2008

Lehr spoke at the Heartland Institute’s 2008 International Conference on Climateย Change.

His presentation, below, is titled โ€œHumans Are Not the Cause of Climateย Changeโ€:

Affiliationsย 

Publications

According to the Heartland Institute, Lehr is the author of 400 magazine and journal articles and 12ย books.

Lehr’s profile at โ€œThe Encyclopedia of Water,โ€ where he was chief editor, reveals that these 400 articles were on โ€œground water hydrology.โ€ According to a search of Google Scholar, Lehr has not published any articles in peer reviewed journals on the subject of climateย change.

Sampleย Publications:

  • Jay H. Lehr, ed., Rational Readings on Environmental Concerns (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold,ย 1992).
  • Jay H. Lehr, Standard Handbook of Environmental Science, Health, and Technology (McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.ย 2000).

Other Resources

Profile image screenshot from YouTube, Jay Lehr speaking at the Heartland Institute’s 12th International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC12).

Resources

Related Profiles

The Heartland Institute Background Stance on Climate Change Funding Key People Actions Heartland International Conference on Climate Change Related&n...
Tom Harris Credentials B. Eng. , M. Eng. (Mech., thermofluids and energy sciences). โ€œTom Harris - ICSC Executive Director,โ€ International Climate Science Coalition. Archived September 15, 2...
Australian Climate Science Coalition (ACSC) Background The Australian Climate Science Coalition (ACSC) has been described as an offshoot of the the Australian Environment Foundation (AE...
John Stossel Credentials Honoris Causa Doctorate, Francisco Marroquin University (2008).โ€œHonorary Doctorate to John Stossel,โ€ Newmedia UFM, January 14, 2008. Archived December 29, 2017....