Canadian PM Harper repackaging Bush's carbon intensity spin

on

Stephen Harper’s lack of real leadership in the climate change crisis means that Canada’s opportunity to lead the world in meaningful and significant environmental policy is traveling further further away from reality.

His hard push toward intensity targets over hard caps begs the question – just how stupid does he think Canadians are?

(Apparently as stupid as Bush find Americans).

Intensity targets are a sexy way of saying lots and doing nothing. A nice accounting trick more than anything.

Carbon intensity is usually defined as the ratio of carbon emissions to economic activity. Put simply, if carbon emissions go up at a rate close to economic growth, the overall carbon intensity would be nil.

It’s been convenient spin for the United States which pledges to cut greenhouse gas intensity by 18% by 2012, but so far between 1990 to 2000 the carbon intensity of the U.S. economy declined by 17 percent yet total emissions increased by 14 percent.

So just how far are Canadians going to be spun before the wheels fall off of Harper and Bush’s intensity bandwagon?

Related Posts

on
Critics say the firm’s deployment of unproven carbon capture technology risks contributing to a gas-powered AI boom.
on
The former Hungarian PM’s “propaganda machine” has returned with “a new look”, says Greens MEP Daniel Freund.
on
Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne aren’t the party’s only big money backers.
Analysis
on
Financiers with short-term incentives can profit big even if the west coast pipeline pushed by Mark Carney and Alberta costs taxpayers billions.