EPA scientists drop bombshell in political-interference survey

authordefault
onApr 23, 2008 @ 12:29 PDT

Science around environmental matters has long been dismissed in the rough and tumble of U.S. politics, but many scientists contend things got markedly worse through two terms under President Bush, as incidents have shown how political appointees were involved in shaping government reports on everything from climate change toย condoms.

Now, more than half the 1,600 Environmental Protection Agency scientists who responded to an online questionnaire complained of political pressure in interpreting and performing theirย work.

And four in 10 scientists who have worked at the agency for more than a decade said interference has been more prevalent in the last five years thanย previously.

Hundreds of Environmental Protection Agency scientists said they have been victims of political interference and pressure from superiors to skew their findings, according to a survey by the Union of Concernedย Scientists.

Francesca Grifo, director of the Union of Concerned Scientists’ Scientific Integrity Program, said the survey results revealed โ€œan agency in crisisโ€ with low morale, especially among scientists involved in risk assessment and craftingย regulations.

โ€œThe investigation shows researchers are generally continuing to do their work, but their scientific findings are tossed aside when it comes time to write regulations,โ€ Grifoย said.

The survey comes as EPA is under fire from Congress on a number of fronts, including its delay in determining whether carbon dioxide should be regulated to combat globalย warming.

EPA scientists described an agency where senior managers and the White House Office of Management and Budget frequently second-guess scientific findings and change work conducted by EPA scientists, the reportย said.

No surpriseย there.

Here’s the full report, Interference at the EPA, by the Union of Concernedย Scientists.

Attached at the end of this post is a pdf version of the fullย report.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

onNov 28, 2025 @ 03:02 PST

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.
Opinion
onNov 27, 2025 @ 06:38 PST

Blunt communication is our firewall.

Blunt communication is our firewall.
onNov 25, 2025 @ 22:00 PST

The programme is โ€œyet another bung to industrial productionโ€, experts say.

The programme is โ€œyet another bung to industrial productionโ€, experts say.
Analysis
onNov 24, 2025 @ 09:00 PST

Critics say new LNG ventures in British Columbia saddle Indigenous communities with debt, opaque ownership structures, and financial risk that could leave them owing billions.

Critics say new LNG ventures in British Columbia saddle Indigenous communities with debt, opaque ownership structures, and financial risk that could leave them owing billions.