Scholars & Rogues Digs Deeper: Who Audits the Auditors?

picture-2737-1346575540.jpg
on

[Update June 17th] Scholars & Rogues sparked a vigorous discussion about various tree-ring chronologies, and readers are encouraged to look through the discussions on S&R as well as McIntyreโ€™s Climate Audit for all the juicy details.ย  We also wish to note a correction made by Angliss regarding which graph was in discussion, but that point was not quoted by Desmogblogย here.ย 

Finally, we wish to highlight Desmogblogโ€™s interest in the subject.ย  We distinguished below between โ€œthe new famous โ€˜hide the declineโ€™ statement, which Fox News picked up as meaning โ€˜hide the decline in all global temperaturesโ€™,โ€ vs. the more subtle discussion points of specific pieces of climateย evidence.ย 

Last week we mentioned a detailed analysis by Scholars & Rogues about how the stolen emails lack enough context to draw conclusions about climate science.ย  This week in part 2, Brian Angliss gets more into the nitty-gritty details, challenging statements made by self-appointed Climate Auditor and mining executive Steve McIntyre andย others.ย 

Often McIntyreโ€™s discussions are not commented on by climate scientists, because they arenโ€™t worth replying to.ย  RealClimate.org does when a response is warranted, but most claims and assertions go unchecked, becoming memes within a small subsection of passionate climate scpetics.ย  Angliss has found numerous misrepresentations within McIntyreโ€™s writing, calling him out on exactly the kind of thing he likes to accuse real climate scientists of.ย 

For example, Angliss gets into the weeds on the new famous โ€˜hide the declineโ€™ statement, which Fox News picked up as meaning โ€˜hide the decline in all global temperaturesโ€™.ย  McIntyre and others are more restrained, focusing on the decline shown by tree ring data, which is one form of climate change evidence.ย  Yet the set of tree ring data they come back to time and again, the Briffa reconstruction, is only a small part of the evidence weย have.

First, the tree rings that diverge from the instrumental record are not all tree ring datasets, but rather a subset of tree ring datasets. In particular, the divergence problem applies to the Briffa 2000 dataset taken from trees close to the Arctic Circle. Other tree ring datasets donโ€™t show the same divergence issue, as summarized in Cook et al 2004 and as shown in the image below (note that the northern tree rings in dark blue diverge while the southern tree rings in red do not โ€“ and Briffaโ€™s rings are from northerly trees). In summary, the southerly tree ring record matches the instrumental record while the northerly tree rings diverge after 1950 orย so.

While this graph is only partially relevant to the exact discussion of a specific graph discussed in the emails, it is helpful to put the entirety of this episode into context, which is exactly what Angliss is doing.ย  He then gets more specific in terms of addressing McIntyreโ€™sย concern.

Second, recent papers have shown that, before the period of divergence, reconstructed temperatures from northerly tree rings closely match may other temperature proxies including boreholes, corals, lake sediments, stalagmites, and the lengths of glacial tongues. As John Cook, editor of the climate science website Skeptical Science putย it,

Since 1999, there have been many independent reconstructions of past temperatures, using a variety of proxy data and a number of different methodologies. All find the same result โ€“ that the last few decades are the hottest in the last 500 to 2000 years (depending on how far back the reconstruction goes). (source)

While the Cook et al 2004 paper was not published until after the TAR, Fullerโ€™s and McIntyreโ€™s claims of replacement and substitution were published in January and March, 2010 respectively. At this point, McIntyre and Fuller should both be aware enough of the progress made in dendroclimatology (deducing past climate from tree rings) since 2001 to not make erroneousย claims.

Youโ€™re forgiven if this seems dry and tedious, because it can be, and a big thanks is owed to Scholars & Rogues for the detailed analysis. Check out the entire piece for moreย depth.ย 

DeSmogBlog seeks to uncover the spin and propoganda that dirty energy interests masquerade as expert opinion in the theatre of politics.ย  We seek to clear the air and help show readers the bigger picture.ย  We happily let others deal with the nuances of temperature records or the exact meaning of emails stolen from East Anglia climate researchers.ย  Why? Because independent reviews, scientists and even the authors of the book Climategate: The CRUtape Letters (who helped break the story in the first place) agree that these minor discussions donโ€™t change the overall understanding of climateย change.

picture-2737-1346575540.jpg

Morgan Goodwin has been a passionate advocate for climate solutions since college, where he spent more time organizing than he did on classes.ย  There, he was a Chinese major, student body co-president and one of the leaders of Thursday Night Group, the campus climate action group. Since graduating in 2008 , in no particular order, Morgan has worked on a community energy efficiency campaign in western Mass, co-directed NH SPROG for the SSC and worked on Power Vote in Cleveland. He spent two months travelling in China, meeting youth climate activists and learning about the solar hot water business. He worked on Long Island for a solar and wind company doing home evaluations and sales. And he spent the better part of 2009 in DC at the Avaaz Action Factory advocating for stronger DC policy in the lead-up toย Copenhagen.

Morgan writes and conducts research for Desmogblog and supports the activism of several youth climate organizations.ย  His writing has been published in the HuffingtonPost, SolveClimate, Watthead, and the The Climate Community. Morgan co-manages ItsGettingHotInHere.org, the largest single-issue youth blog in theย world.

Related Posts

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.
on

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.
on

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.
on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.