A Democrat Undermines Science

authordefault
on

In my debate a few months back with Kenneth Green about the left, the right, and science, my colleague really could have used some more strong examples of left wing scienceย abuse.

Now, he hasย one.

There is no other way to spin it: The Obama administrationโ€™s decision to ignore the FDA, and refuse to make Plan B emergency contraception (the โ€œmorning afterโ€ pill) available over the counter, is a clear and unequivocal case of politics interfering with science. And it is a particularly galling one because, as former FDA official Susan Wood points out, this is one of the key issues on which the last administration, that of George W. Bush, misused science. So there is every reason for the Obama administration to have known better, and to have doneย differently.

In fact, the bogus argument that Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius used, to justify overruling her own expert agency, is the same bogus argument that was attempted during the Bushย years.

Sebelius arguedย that

The label comprehension and actual use studies did not contain data for all ages for which this product would be available for useโ€ฆ.the data, submitted by Teva [Pharmaceuticals], do not conclusively establish that Plan B One-Step should be made available over the counter for all girls of reproductiveย age.

Hereโ€™s what I reported in The Republican War on Science, back inย 2005:

The FDAโ€™s stated reason for ignoring its scientific advisersโ€”that Barr [Pharmaceuticals] had not provided adequate data on how younger adolescents would use theย drugโ€ฆ.

In both cases, politicians were demanding more โ€œdataโ€ on a drug that has already been proven safe, and creating hurdles that other drugsโ€”drugs not having something to do with, uh, sexโ€“have not had toย clear.

The interesting question is why the Obama administration has so clearly abused science on this issue. After all, it is not like the Democrats usually do what the Christian right says. And concerns about Plan B have long been tied to Christian right moralizing about young girls andย promiscuity.

One can only hypothesize: Perhaps this is an attempt to head off potential criticism from the right in a coming electionย year.

But thatโ€™s just the pointโ€”you donโ€™t get to go against the science for any reason, whether it is to appease your own base or to protect yourself from political attack. The excuse doesnโ€™t matter, because there is noย excuse.

I donโ€™t think this one case study changes the big picture: The right is still much more in conflict with science than the left. And in my new book The Republican Brain, I will explain why it is very natural that things should be this wayโ€”that, generally, liberals and scientists should find themselves aligned, and conservatives and scientists should find themselvesย opposed.

But that doesnโ€™t mean there wonโ€™t be counterexamples in complex social systems, or political situations. And the supposedly pro-science (and now simply hypocritical) Obama administration has just provided a very, very bigย one.

Related Posts

on

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.
Analysis
on

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.
on

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.
on

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.