DeSmog

Facebook-f X-twitter
Subscribe

DeSmog

Donate
Search
Search

Retraction and Apology for Incorrect Claims About West Virginia Chemical Origins

By Brendan DeMelle
on

DeSmogBlog regrets the incorrect claims made in an article published late Sunday night regarding the origins of the chemical spilled into the Elk River in West Virginia. The piece incorrectly asserted that the chemical was produced by Georgia-Pacific. In fact, it was produced by Eastman Chemical. DeSmogBlog sincerely regrets the error and has retracted the piece. 

By Brendan DeMelle
Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
Brendan is Executive Director of DeSmog. He is also a writer focused on disinformation and corporate accountability.

Related Posts

uk/Millions of Dollars Pouring into UK Democracy from Trump’s America
ByMax Colbert and Sam Bright
on
This funding, including significant sums received by MPs, “poses urgent questions for the government”, campaigners say.
Series: Defending-UK-Democracy, MAGA
Revealed: Pro-AI Data Center Group Spending At Least $2.54M on TV Ads to Influence Ohio Election
ByEdward Donnelly and Rei Takver
on
Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz, and Greg Brockman are among the Silicon Valley megadonors reportedly linked to a campaign to influence voters in a state at the heart of the data center boom.
Series: Tech vs Climate
us/Ohio Denies Evidence of Fracking Waste in Drinking Water. Its Own Records Show Otherwise. 
ByJustin Nobel
on
As more than a billion gallons of oil and gas wastewater flood beneath Ohio, pollution concerns reach its heated governor’s race.
Outline of the state of Ohio, filled red, with the locations of Columbus, Coshocton, and Marietta in central, eastern and southeastern parts. The graphic of Ohio has valves and pipes of a fracking wastewater injection well pumping waste into the state. A vintage 1900s era map surrounds Ohio.
President Trump Unveils EPA’s New Contradictory Methane Proposal at Campaign Rally
ByRachel Santarsiero
on
The agency is loosening methane rules while keeping its authority to regulate them. Critics say the stance leaves federal climate law in limbo, inviting a bigger rollback later.