Pentagon Calls Climate Change Impacts "Threat Multipliers," Could Enable Terrorism

picture-7018-1583982147.png
on

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 2014 version of itsย Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR)ย yesterday, declaring the threat of climate change impacts a very serious national security vulnerability that, among other things, could enable further terroristย activity.ย 

Released every four years, the QDR is a broad outline of U.S. military strategy discussing how to maintain global U.S. military hegemony. Like the 2010 document, the 64-page 2014 QDR again highlights the threats posed to national security by ever-worsening global climateย disruption.

โ€œThe impacts of climate change may increase the frequency, scale, and complexity of future missions, including defense support to civil authorities, while at the same time undermining the capacity of our domestic installations to support training activities,โ€ the report details.

โ€œClimate change poses another significant challenge for the United States and the world at large. As greenhouse gas emissions increase, sea levels are rising, average global temperatures are increasing, and severe weather patterns areย accelerating.โ€

For sake of context,ย some members of the U.S. Congress still deny the existence of climate change, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. But the Pentagon’s assessment is that global warming is not only real, but also a civilizational threat, as stated in sobering language in the past three QDRs.

As outlined in Christian Parenti‘s 2011 book, โ€œTropic of Chaos: Climate Change and the New Geography of Violence,โ€ the military establishment understands climate change is an unparalleled global threat, saying so clearly in reports like the QDR. The problem: its activities around the world are in large part responsible for the threat to beginย with.

โ€œTheat Multipliersโ€ฆCan Enable Terroristย Activityโ€

Although climate change doesn’t have its own robust section as it did in the 2010 QDR,ย in each of the eight times it’s mentioned this time around, the QDR draws similarย conclusions.ย 

Climate change has the ability to โ€œdevastate homes, land, and infrastructureโ€ and โ€œmay exacerbate water scarcity and lead to sharp increases in foodย costs.โ€

Further, the QDR says the desperation that many people, particularly in poorer regions, will face due to climate change impacts could lead to โ€œresource competitionโ€ and even โ€œterroristย activity.โ€

โ€œThe pressures caused by climate change will influence resource competition while placing additional burdens on economies, societies, and governance institutions around the world,โ€ explains the report.

โ€œThese effects are threat multipliers that will aggravate stressors abroad such as poverty, environmental degradation, political instability, and social tensions โ€“ conditions that can enable terrorist activity and other forms ofย violence.โ€

Spending the bulk of QDRย ink perscribing the damages climate change will wreak on a global scale, the report also points to a few suggestions of how to tackle the crisis. Sortย of.

โ€œCreative Ways to Addressโ€ฆClimateย Changeโ€

According to the Pentagon, it’s not all doom and gloom goingย forward.

โ€œ[T]he department will employ creative ways to address the impact of climate change, which will continue to affect the operating environment and the roles and missions that U.S. Armed Forces undertake,โ€ says the QDR. โ€œThe Department will remain ready to operate in a changing environment amid the challenges of climate change and environmentalย damage.โ€

What the Department of Defense plans to do to tackle the crisis, though, is explained only in the vaguest ofย terms.ย 

โ€œWe have increased our preparedness for the consequences of environmental damage and continue to seek to mitigate these risks while taking advantage of opportunities,โ€ says the report.

The QDR then explains a couple more specific examples of its plans for theย future.

The QDR explains, โ€œThe Departmentโ€™s operational readiness hinges on unimpeded access to land, air, and sea training and test spaceโ€ฆ[and] [w]e are developing new policies, strategies, and plans, including the Departmentโ€™s Arcticย Strategy.โ€

Making Bad Problemย Worse

Unfortunately, the Pentagon’s Arctic Strategy โ€” published in November 2013 as a follow up to President Obama’s National Strategy for the Arctic Region published last May โ€” would only make a bad problemย worse.

ClimateProgress Co-Editor Ryan Koronowski unpacked this in a November 2013 article:

The Arctic Strategyโ€™s approach follows on the National Strategy for the Arctic Region, released in May, which focused โ€” perhaps a little too much โ€” on how a warming Arctic would allow the U.S. to access currently-inaccessible fossil fuelsโ€ฆIndeed, the main reason why the Arctic is warming enough to create such โ€œhistoric opportunitiesโ€ is the burning of fossil fuels that drives climateย change.

As we’ve pointed out here on DeSmogBlog before, the Pentagon is an enormous consumer of fossilย fuels.

Asย TomDispatch Associate Editor Nick Turseย hasย explainedย (emphases mine), โ€œIn 2009, according to the Pentagonโ€™s Defense Energy Support Center (DESC), the military spent $3.8 billion for 31.3 million barrels โ€“ around 1.3 billion gallons โ€“ of oil consumed at posts, camps, and bases overseas.โ€

With special operations forces stationed in over 100 countries around the world, one thing’s for certain: the environmental costs of militarism are huge.

But until the Pentagon’s call for โ€œunimpeded access to land, air, and sea training and test spaceโ€ ends, we can continue to expect QDRs every four years drawing increasingly horrificย conclusions.ย 

Photo Credit: U.S. Department ofย Defense

picture-7018-1583982147.png
Steve Horn is the owner of the consultancy Horn Communications & Research Services, which provides public relations, content writing, and investigative research work products to a wide range of nonprofit and for-profit clients across the world. He is an investigative reporter on the climate beat for over a decade and former Research Fellow for DeSmog.

Related Posts

on

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.
Analysis
on

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.
on

Critics say the controversial GWP* method โ€“ which New Zealand appears close to adopting โ€“ is โ€œopen to significant abuseโ€.

Critics say the controversial GWP* method โ€“ which New Zealand appears close to adopting โ€“ is โ€œopen to significant abuseโ€.
on

Lord Moynihan of Chelsea, who holds shares in Shell and TotalEnergies, called the green transition a โ€œchildrenโ€™s crusadeโ€.

Lord Moynihan of Chelsea, who holds shares in Shell and TotalEnergies, called the green transition a โ€œchildrenโ€™s crusadeโ€.