This is How the Energy Industry Reacted to the Kyoto Protocol

authordefault
on

This DeSmog UK epic history post describes how an economic think tank became a beacon of light around which the industries most affected by the new Kyoto Protocol met to discuss strategies to deal with the internationalย agreement.

The first time is tragedy โ€“ the second time is farce. Lord Lawson, the former chancellor, is today the chairman of the Global Warming Policyย Foundation.

The member of the House of Lords claims that his registered charity, which attacks policy designed to prevent climate change, has no financial links to the oilย industry.ย 

Twenty years ago, Lord Lawson was chairman of another charity. This one was specifically established to represent the oil industry, building bridges with senior politicians and civilย servants.

This charity was directly funded by Shell and BP, and it held a conference in which the science and policy of climate change were roundlyย attacked.

Lessons From theย Past

They say ‘once burned, twice shy’. So what can we learn about the history of Lord Lawson’s involvement with energy industry front groups when assessing his claim to be an impartial arbiter of climate scienceย today?

Lawson was president of the British Institute of Energy Economics (BIEE) at the time of the Kyoto Protocolโ€™s adoption in the lateย โ€˜90s.ย 

The London-based charitable think tank was heavily funded by BP, Shell and other oil companies to foster closer relationships between the energy industry, politicians and the captains of the civilย service.

As such, the BIEE became a beacon of light around which the industries most affected by the new international agreement met to discussย strategies.

The charity held a two-day event titled Climate After Kyotoโ€”Implications for Energy at Chatham House in February 1998 at which John Browne from BP was the keynoteย speaker.

โ€˜Beyondย Denialโ€™

โ€œWe are at a historic moment. A moment of great opportunity,โ€ Browne told the assembled civil servants and energy executives. โ€œKyoto and the debate around it has demonstrated that the issue is being taken seriously. We have moved โ€“ as the psychologists would say โ€“ beyondย denial.โ€

He added: โ€œThat is not to say weโ€™ve reached the point of scientific certainty. We havenโ€™t. The science of climate change is still provisional. Maybe it always will be โ€ฆ but there is a growing consensus that this is an issue we have to takeย seriously.โ€

Browne explained that BP had been attacked when he first spoke about climate change nine months earlier, when he was accused of โ€œtaking a maverick viewโ€, โ€œbreaking ranks with our colleaguesโ€ and โ€œleaving theย churchโ€.

Browne praised his rivals at Shell and Texaco for supporting climate action at Davos the week before and even welcomed government intervention. But this praise for Kyoto was not echoed by all of the BIEEย speakers.

Industryย Divided

The other industrialists appeared divided in how they should approach Kyoto, with many claiming their chosen fossil fuel had a future while others mightย not.ย 

Noticeably, none attacked the science of climate change or the work of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and only the most sceptical dared challenge the recognised environmental implications of burning fossilย fuels.

Walter van de Vijver, the chief executive of Shell International Gas, Dr Mohammad Al-Sabban, the senior economic advisor to the Saudi Arabian Oil Ministry, and Ron Knapp of the World Coal Institute spoke at theย event.

The man from Shell told guests that โ€œeasily available and affordable energy from fossil fuels has shaped the world we live in todayโ€ and concluded somewhat surprisingly that Kyoto meant that โ€œgas is the fuel for the 21stย centuryโ€.

Knapp brought along a PowerPoint presentation which informed the napping delegates that his was the single biggest fuel used in generating electricity in the world, and that improvements in efficiency would reduce the amount of emissions his industry poured into theย atmosphere.

Discriminating Againstย Coal

Knapp provided a thorough, but rather technical, attack on the Kyoto agreement. He complained that โ€œcoal is the soft target for campaigners against climate changeโ€ and offered the robust defence that โ€œcoal is only one of the contributors to the expansion in manmade greenhouse gas emissions, particularly inย Europe.โ€

Knapp claimed that the new agreement would simply cause the โ€œflightโ€ of emissions, investment and jobs to countries not yet forced to reduceย emissions.

The man from coal concluded defiantly: โ€œThe World Coal Institute will fight against the introduction of policies that discriminate againstย coal.โ€

Lawson, who remained president of the BIEE for nine years and often delighted its members with his witty and insightful after-dinner speeches, told me that he did not attend this particular event. It would still be some time before he would promote his own views onย Kyoto.

Next up on the DeSmog UK epic history series, we look at the creation of Michael Mannโ€™s hockey stick graph and the counter-attack launched by the climateย deniers.

@brendanmontague

Photo: Seรฑor Codo viaย flickr

Related Posts

on

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.
on

Ahead of a city council vote, Resource Works launched an influence campaign with stock submissions for restaurant owners, hospitality workers, and residents.

Ahead of a city council vote, Resource Works launched an influence campaign with stock submissions for restaurant owners, hospitality workers, and residents.
on

Ahead of the November 29 election, dairy producers tell Irish government to step off the โ€œtreadmillโ€ of unsustainable milk production โ€“ and share a more holistic vision.

Ahead of the November 29 election, dairy producers tell Irish government to step off the โ€œtreadmillโ€ of unsustainable milk production โ€“ and share a more holistic vision.
on

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€