Met Office Asks British Public to #NameOurStorms. Here's What They Came Up With

R2uAVsWy_400x400
onSep 9, 2015 @ 04:26 PDT

The Met Office asked and the public has answered: name our storms after climateย deniers.

This week, the Met Office issued a call for people to help create a list of names for storms expected to affect the UK and Ireland this winter. Names can be suggested by tweeting directly to @metoffice using the twitter hashtag โ€˜#nameourstormsโ€™ or on its Facebook page and via email.

And it turns out that quite a few people are calling for the names of UK climate deniers such as Lord Lawson, Lord Monckton and Matt Ridley to beย used.

Threateningย Weather

โ€œPutting names on severe storms helps the public to immediately relate to threatening weather systems,โ€ explains the MET office. As climate change continues to create more extreme weather, it seems fitting to name severe storms after those who deny manmade climate change in order to create awareness of this โ€œthreateningย weatherโ€.

Hereโ€™s what some prominent UK climate deniers have to say about climateย change:

Lord Lawson: โ€œIt is far from clear that the inhabitants of the planet as a whole would suffer a significant net cost, or indeed any cost atย all.โ€

Matt Ridley: โ€œA cumulative change of less than 2ยฐC by the end of this century will do no net harm. It will actually do net good [โ€ฆ] rainfall will increase slightly, growing seasons will lengthen, Greenland’s ice cap will melt only very slowly, and soย on.โ€

Lord Monckton: โ€œThe right response to the non-problem of global warming is to have the courage to doย nothing.โ€

Peter Lilley: โ€œThe tendency of those committed to the theory of catastrophic man-made global warming to unquestioningly adopt the assumptions, at every stage, that maximise the expectation of calamity should alert us that groupthink is driving theย movement.โ€

James Delingpole: โ€œIt is not my job to sit down and read peer-reviewed papers because I simply haven’t got the time โ€ฆ I am an interpreter ofย interpretations.โ€

Other suggestions on Twitter include greenhouse gas emitters such as BP and Shell. And, after this summerโ€™s cuts to renewable subsidies, โ€œStorm Amberโ€ and โ€œStorm Osborneโ€ were alsoย suggested.

Popularย Names

The Met office will compile a list of the publicโ€™s suggestions along with names proposed by Met ร‰ireann. Storm names will then be taken from this list in alphabetical order, alternating between male and female names. (Although, sticking strictly to British climate deniers may result in a lack of female stormย names.)

โ€œPopularity will play a large role in the final list. We have had thousands of suggestions and we are currently collating these. We will be communicating further on the progress of the list by the end of this week or the beginning of next week. We expect to have a final list by the end of the month,โ€ a Met Office press officer told DeSmog UK.

Just imagine turning on the television or radio to hear โ€œbrace for violent thunderstorms as Storm Monckton gathers speedโ€ or โ€œtorrential downpours sweep in from the North as Storm Ridleyย approaches.โ€

Photo: John Kerstholt via Wikimediaย Commons

R2uAVsWy_400x400
Kyla is a freelance writer and editor with work appearing in the New York Times, National Geographic, HuffPost, Mother Jones, and Outside. She is also a member of the Society for Environmental Journalists.

Related Posts

onNov 28, 2025 @ 03:02 PST

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.
Opinion
onNov 27, 2025 @ 06:38 PST

Blunt communication is our firewall.

Blunt communication is our firewall.
onNov 25, 2025 @ 22:00 PST

The programme is โ€œyet another bung to industrial productionโ€, experts say.

The programme is โ€œyet another bung to industrial productionโ€, experts say.
Analysis
onNov 24, 2025 @ 09:00 PST

Critics say new LNG ventures in British Columbia saddle Indigenous communities with debt, opaque ownership structures, and financial risk that could leave them owing billions.

Critics say new LNG ventures in British Columbia saddle Indigenous communities with debt, opaque ownership structures, and financial risk that could leave them owing billions.