Climate Denial Group Global Warming Policy Foundation Books Royal Society Venue for Matt Ridley Lecture

authordefault
on

This is a guestย post fromย ClimateDenierRoundupย crossposted from Dailyย Kos.

Last weekย we talked aboutย a group in the UK who tried, but ultimately failed, to use a respected institution as the venue for a denial conference in an effort to drum upย headlines.

Now the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) is looking to try their luck at the same ploy โ€”ย booking space at the Royal Society for a lecture from Matt โ€œKing Coalโ€ย Ridley.

In aย statement published on New Scientist, the Royal Society defended its decision to rent out space to the GWPF.

The Society acknowledges that the science on climate is clear, says that it opposes efforts to misrepresent climate science, and has disagreed strongly with the GWPFย before.

But the Society apparently thinks the GWPF has now accepted reality and is merely interested in discussing policies to address the climate problem. At least thatโ€™s the impression given by their last sentence: โ€œIf the GWPF use this opportunity to misrepresent the scientific evidence it would undermine the legitimacy of their views on policy responses to climateย change.โ€

Except we already know there is no legitimacy to their views. The GWPFโ€™sย bias and blurring of fact and commentย is why they had to spin off a lobbying arm of their non-profit. The same day the New Scientist story was published, the campaign (not educational charity) arm of the GWPFย published a postย suggesting that thereโ€™s a 10 year โ€œpauseโ€ in Arctic sea ice melt, despite starting the post with a graph showing the clear decline in ice sinceย 1978.

This arctic ice โ€œpauseโ€ is obviously just natural variability, despite their claim that it might be a meaningful trend. This is ironic, given theirย claimsย that 2015โ€™s record heat was just a natural variability, and not indicative of a meaningfulย trend.

Well, maybe not ironic, so much as a demonstration of Lewandowskyโ€™sย White Queenย concept (discussed by Greg Laden too.)

Sadly, the Royal Society seems committed to allowing the GWPF to leech off of the august institutionโ€™s credibility. But perhaps the GWPF is so full of crap that the Royal Society can be convinced to give them the royalย flush.

Main image: Lord Matt Ridley. Credit: Flickr/IAB UK

authordefault

Related Posts

on

Nigel Farageโ€™s party has a long history of rejecting basic climate science.

Nigel Farageโ€™s party has a long history of rejecting basic climate science.
on

New accounts show the oil and gas industry trying to weaken methane reporting while saving the federal emissions system it relies on.

New accounts show the oil and gas industry trying to weaken methane reporting while saving the federal emissions system it relies on.
on

At the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s annual meeting, members of Leonard Leoโ€™s network explain why the right-wing court majority is crucial for protecting oil companies from climate lawsuits.

At the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s annual meeting, members of Leonard Leoโ€™s network explain why the right-wing court majority is crucial for protecting oil companies from climate lawsuits.
on

Toronto Sun opinion writer Jay Goldberg works for a group that backs Trumpโ€™s AI strategy and has received funding from a Big Tech lobbying firm.

Toronto Sun opinion writer Jay Goldberg works for a group that backs Trumpโ€™s AI strategy and has received funding from a Big Tech lobbying firm.