Did the British Museum Fail to Consider the Ethics of Renewing BP Sponsorship Deal?

R2uAVsWy_400x400
on

The British Museum has failed to assess the ethical issues involved in having oil giant BP sponsor its gallery, argue campaign group Art Not Oil, upon the release of newย documents.

Information provided by the British Museum to Art Not Oil through a freedom of information request shows the museum does not have an ethics committee or policy, and trustees were not involved in the decision to renew BPโ€™s sponsorship for another fiveย years.

Instead, the choice to renew the deal was made entirely by the museumโ€™s new director Harwig Fischer, with trustees later being โ€œinformedโ€ of the controversial decision prior to the public announcement inย July.

For these reasons, Art Not Oil is arguing the museum broke its own rules by not involving the trustees in a decision which raises ethical questions. The deal with BP is therefore โ€œillegitimate and must be reversedโ€ the groupย said.

The news comes on the same day that museum trustees met in Manchester for an โ€˜away dayโ€™. It is believed this is the first time they will be meeting since the museum decided to renew the BPย deal.

As Art Not Oil explains, sponsorship deals such as this give companies a โ€œsocial license to operateโ€ despite the destructive impact their operations have on theย climate.

According to the campaign group, the former director of the British Museum, Neil MacGregor, outlined the museumโ€™s decision-making process in a November 2015 letter to staff represented by the Public and Commercial Servicesย Union.

In it, he wrote: โ€œAny ethical questions which arise in the context of the Museumโ€™s activities or sponsorships are discussed and decided by the Board ofย Trustees.โ€

However, according to the information released today, this does not appear to haveย happened.

Jess Worth from Art Not Oil said: โ€œWithout a dedicated ethics policy, an ethics committee or active oversight by its trustees, the director could overlook BPโ€™s role as one of the worldโ€™s most destructive fossil fuel companies and ignore the damage it is doing to the museumโ€™sย reputation.

โ€œThe renewal meets neither the ethical standards we expect of leading museums nor the ethical standards being demanded by theย public.โ€

โ€œThis is very disappointing,โ€ said Clara Paillard, president of the PCS Union Culture Sector which represents many British Museumย staff.

โ€œ[Neil MacGregor] assured us that any ethical questions arising around sponsorship are discussed and decided by the Board of Trustees, and that they take this veryย seriously.โ€

Yet a spokesperson for the British Museum, speaking to the Independent, rejected the claims made by Art Not Oil, stating they were confused about the comment made byย MacGregor.

They told the Independent: โ€œWe have governance procedures quite clearly laid out and when it comes to issues related to bringing money to the museums, trustees delegate to theย director.โ€

While trustees are responsible for considering ethics, the spokesperson said, whether or not the deal raises such issues โ€œdepends on the definition of ethicalย questionsโ€.

Due to the museumโ€™s longstanding relationship with BP, the decision to continue the relationship was โ€œstraightforwardโ€ theyย said.

But not everyone at the museum seems to think so. According to Paillard, a survey conducted by the union last March found 62 percent of staff thought oil sponsorship wasย unethical.

โ€œIt is time for Big Oil to become persona non grata in our museums, just as tobacco companies are,โ€ Paillard said. โ€œClimate change is happening now and these fossil fuel corporations shouldnโ€™t be given a license to build a reputation as philanthropists rather than the climate-wreckers theyย are.โ€

BP renewed its 5-year sponsorship deal with the British Museum, National Portrait Gallery, the Royal Opera House, and the Royal Shakespeare Company in July, however itโ€™s total spend dropped from ยฃ10 toย ยฃ7.5m.

Meanwhile, its sponsorship of the Tate and the Edinburgh International Festival have come to an end after more than two decades following sustained public protests against theย deals.

Photo: ‘Splashmob’ protest at British Museum against BP sponsorship / photo byย Kristianย Buus

Get Weekly News Updates

R2uAVsWy_400x400
Kyla is a freelance writer and editor with work appearing in the New York Times, National Geographic, HuffPost, Mother Jones, and Outside. She is also a member of the Society for Environmental Journalists.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Oil patch advocate Lisa Baiton called for more extraction and less regulation at Vancouver address that didnโ€™t once mention climate change.

Oil patch advocate Lisa Baiton called for more extraction and less regulation at Vancouver address that didnโ€™t once mention climate change.
on

PA-based CEO Toby Rice hobnobbed with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Now heโ€™s poised for pipelines, exports, and profits.

PA-based CEO Toby Rice hobnobbed with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Now heโ€™s poised for pipelines, exports, and profits.
on

Longtime DeSmog reporter and author of The Petroleum Papers will play a key leadership role as we investigate a global resurgence of climate obstruction.

Longtime DeSmog reporter and author of The Petroleum Papers will play a key leadership role as we investigate a global resurgence of climate obstruction.
on

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.