Global Climate Coalition: Documents Reveal How Secretive Fossil Fuel Lobby Group Manipulated UN Climate Programs

authordefault
on

A fossil fuelโ€“backed industry group was able to influence the process behind the United Nations climate assessments for decades, using lobbyists and industry-funded scientists to manipulate international negotiations, a cache of recently discovered documentsย reveals.

The documents include hundreds of briefings, meeting minutes, notes, and correspondence from the Global Climate Coalition (GCC). They were released Thursday by the Climate Investigations Center in collaboration with DeSmog and Climate Liability News. The documents date from 1989 and continue through 2002, when the lobbying group disbanded as its fossil fuel industry backers succumbed to public pressure to disavow itsย tactics.

The documents show how the GCC influenced international negotiations, manipulated the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changeโ€™s (IPCC) process, and undertook a disinformation campaign designed to cast doubt on mainstream climateย science.

George W. Bush speaking about climate change in 2008.
President George W. Bush speaks on climate change during remarks from the Rose Garden April 16, 2008. Credit: White House photo byย Noah Rabinowitz, publicย domain

What was the Global Climateย Coalition?

The GCC was initially part of the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), before becoming its own entity in 1995. NAM has a long history of defending portions of its membership, including tobacco companies that were facing an onslaught of liability litigation, with aggressive tactics that include discrediting science, attacking scientists, and misleading theย public.

Founding members of the GCC were mainly fossil fuel producers and utilities, including oil majors Shell, Texaco (now a part of Chevron), and Amoco (now part of BPARCO (now a subsidiary of Marathon Petroleum) and Phillips Petroleum; coal miners BHP-Utah International and PeabodyAmerican Electric Power and Pacific Gas and Electric.

Other companies, including Exxon, joined later โ€” and the international oil giant would go on to be a key player in theย group.

Revealed in the documents is a decades-long campaign that continued until 2002, intended to protect its membersโ€™ interests by denying and casting doubt on climate science. Internally, the group acknowledged the dangers of climate change and the scientific consensus that it is overwhelmingly driven by the burning of fossil fuels as early as 1995.

The campaign reached the highest levels of U.S. government, with the State Department giving the GCC credit for leading President George W. Bush to reject the landmark Kyoto Protocol in 2001. An internal State Department briefing, prepared for a meeting with the GCC later that year and included in the documents published Thursday, shows officials were instructed to tell coalition representatives that Bushโ€™s decision was โ€œin part, based on input fromย you.โ€

The Kyoto Protocol, agreed upon in 1997, was the first large-scale international agreement to commit to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The U.S. was one of only three UN members that did not ratify the treaty (Canada laterย withdrew).

Influencing the UNโ€™s Panel of Climateย Scientists

The GCC took a particular interest in the operations of the UNโ€™s official scientific advisory body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which produces the international climate assessments that form the basis for global climate policy andย negotiations.

GCC representatives regularly met with IPCC scientists to lobby the panel to accept industry language in its reports, the documents show. Tax returns show hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on an โ€œIPCC Tracker Fundโ€ to monitor and lobby the IPCCโ€™sย meetings.

In one instance detailed in the documents, the GCC boasted its suggested language was โ€œaccepted almost in its entiretyโ€ after intensive lobbying by its representatives and after โ€œassistance from severalย countries.โ€

The GCC also publicly questioned the validity of the IPCCโ€™s peer-review process and launched public attacks on its scientists, while simultaneously using the IPCCโ€™s status as a respected scientific body to promote the credentials of its own climate science denialย research.

The GCC went beyond targeting climate science. In 1995, Exxon gave a presentation to the GCC on how to counter the evidence linking climate change to human healthย impacts.

In 1997, the GCC wanted to expand its reach with a network of state and local committees that would educate the public about their views on climate change and serve as liaisons to other business and public interest groups with similar views. This plan was implemented, the documents show, with the help of Koch Industries, the U.S.โ€™s largest private energy company, which is an infamous funder of climate science denial across theย globe.

The Collapse of the GCC

By the mid-1990s, however, the GCCโ€™s aggressive tactics and continuing effort to cast doubt on accepted climate science had started to become a problem for some of its members. Nine corporations left the GCC from 1996 to 2000: two automakers, one chemical manufacturer, one utility, and five oilย companies.

BP was the first major oil company to leaveย in 1997, stating that โ€œthe time to consider the policy dimensions of climate change is not when the link between greenhouse gases and climate change is conclusively proven, but when the possibility cannot be discounted and is taken seriously by the society of which we are part. We in BP have reached thatย point.โ€

Additional Takeaways: Infiltrating UN Climate Negotiations, Embracing Climate Deniers Publicly But Notย Privately

The documents published Thursday on the Climate Investigation Centerโ€™s Climate Files archive, alsoย show:

  • The GCC stacked UN meetings with its members. Some attended meetings transparently, registering as GCC members, while others registered with other NGOs. Often GCC members outnumbered delegates from developing nations at the annual Conference of the Parties (COP)ย meetings.

  • The GCC coordinated to monitor IPCC meetings. After IPCC meetings, GCC notes reveal attendees met to discuss strategies for exploiting scientific uncertainties in IPCC climate models and amplifying scientific differences of opinion. On at least one occasion, a contractor for the Electric Power Research Institute planned to keep tabs on IPCC proceedings.ย ย 

  • The GCC internally refuted climate deniers, yet continued to publicly cite their work: Exxon scientist Lenny Bernstein, who co-chaired the GCCโ€™s committee on science and technology assessment, called the work of climate deniers Richard Lindzen and Patrick Michaels โ€œnot convincingโ€ in a draft document in 1995. The final copy of that document included no mention of Bernsteinโ€™s comments and the GCC continued to cite the two โ€” as well as other known deniers โ€” through at leastย 1998.

  • The GCC aggressively attempted to control media coverage of climate change: Press releases were sent to reporters praising media coverage featuring climate deniers and correcting those that did not. One document encouraged reporters to contact the GCC for โ€œbalance in the global climate changeย debate.โ€

Related Posts

on

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.
Analysis
on

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.
on

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.
on

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.