Major Cuts To Pollution Control Spending On The Horizon In Canada

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
onMar 2, 2011 @ 06:10 PST

A number of Canadian environmental policies and programs are facing significant budget cuts during the next year. Not surprisingly, reducing carbon emissions and air pollution are two of the areas facing the budget axe from Stephen Harperโ€™s anti-science administration.

Environment Canada will endure a 14% reduction in funding (or $222 million) and the budget to combat global warming emissions and other air pollution will drop a massive 59% (from $240 million to below $100). Previously, global warming and clean-airย funding:

โ€œserved to inform Canadaโ€™s domestic regulatory approach to greenhouse gas emissions, provide a platform to deepen engagement with the U.S. on climate change issues and enhance Canadaโ€™s visibility as an international leader in clean energy technology.โ€

Environmental and public health protection initiatives have long been targeted by Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who has firmly opposed acting to regulate carbon emissions, despite the many high-level recommendations from his own advisors and in the Canadian Parliament to the contrary.

Since Natural Resource Canada will face a 21% reduction (nearly $1 billion), the extremely popular and highly effective home retrofit program (previously funded with $390 million) to pay for energy efficient upgrades will also be axed.

Gillian McEachern, the program manager for climate and energy at Environmental Defence said that the scale of these cuts severely undermines any possibility that industrial emissions of carbon will be regulated this year, or any time in theย future:

โ€œIf theyโ€™re cutting the departmental budget by 60 per cent, we have to question whoโ€™s going to be around to write the regulations.โ€

Such cuts are not reflective of the scientific evidence documenting the need to curb carbon emissions and other pollutants that threaten public health. The Harper administration seems determined to ignore science, and that doesnโ€™t bode well for the Canadian people or the climate that sustains allย life.

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
Brendan is Executive Director of DeSmog. He is also a freelance writer and researcher specializing in media, politics, climate change and energy. His work has appeared in Vanity Fair, The Huffington Post, Grist, The Washington Times and other outlets.

Related Posts

onDec 8, 2025 @ 04:00 PST

The pro-AI and fossil fuel group tells DeSmog that itโ€™s great to see its ideas โ€œget taken up by government.โ€

The pro-AI and fossil fuel group tells DeSmog that itโ€™s great to see its ideas โ€œget taken up by government.โ€
onDec 7, 2025 @ 10:04 PST

Oil companies are once again asking the high court to intervene in climate deception lawsuits across the U.S. โ€” part of an all-hands-on-deck effort by Big Oil and the Trump administration to shut the cases down.

Oil companies are once again asking the high court to intervene in climate deception lawsuits across the U.S. โ€” part of an all-hands-on-deck effort by Big Oil and the Trump administration to shut the cases down.
onDec 7, 2025 @ 06:01 PST

The educational materials distort how fossil fuel pollution has caused the climate emergency, new report finds.

The educational materials distort how fossil fuel pollution has caused the climate emergency, new report finds.
onDec 4, 2025 @ 11:48 PST

U.S. fossil fuel majors led efforts to ensure corporations would not have to introduce climate action plans.

U.S. fossil fuel majors led efforts to ensure corporations would not have to introduce climate action plans.