SUV's Outperform Hybrids in Energy Lifecycle: Interesting if True

authordefault
onApr 7, 2006 @ 17:53 PDT

An autmotive industry number cruncher called CNW Marketing Research has announced a study which claims that, โ€œdust to dust,โ€ high-polluting SUV‘s consume less energy than high-mileage hybrids. The CNW report claims to have calculated total energy consumption in the full lifecycle of an automobile, including construction and disposal, and concluded that SUVs have an energy advantage over gas-electricย hybrids.

Newsday handled the story well, getting reasonable reaction from hybrid majors like Toyota and Honda. But the CNW study deserves more intense scrutiny. First, the company is comparing cheap, long-run production cars to the most innovative and experimental (and therefore short-run) cars on the market. It is inevitable that developing a new technology will be expensive (and energy intensive) in the short-term, and it seems disingenuous – at the least – for CNW not to acknowledge that in its report. CNW also offers a complete list of its results without providing any of the supporting data that might help explain its findings; you can’t help but beย suspicious.

It is true, however, that hybrids have parrallel operating systems โ€“ two engines and a complex drive train to make the whole thing work smoothly. It’s a significant construction challenge. It’s also true that it would be harder to pull a hybrid apart. That’s probably why they fare so well in crash tests, compared to the easily demolished truck-based SUVs.

The best part of this story is that it led us to www.hybridblog.org, a marvellous resource for anyone interested in hybrids or automotive energy efficiency. For example, have a look at recent posts on the relative CO2 savings between a Prius and a couple of dozen compact flourescent lightbulbs. Or a the cranky and articulate analysis of the Bush Administration’s ineffective update of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for so-called โ€œlightย trucks.โ€

The folks at hybridblog, which is โ€œa project of the Union of Concerned Scientists,โ€ promise to weigh in soon on the CNW report. We’re looking foward toย it.


Find what you were looking for?

DeSmogBlog was recently named one of the โ€œTop 50 Eco-Blogsโ€. If this page wasn’t what you wanted, go to our homepage and search through our 5,000 + articles on globalย warming.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

onDec 16, 2025 @ 22:00 PST

Brunswick Groupโ€™s strategies aimed to neutralise growing calls for theatres, museums, and galleries to distance themselves from climate polluters.

Brunswick Groupโ€™s strategies aimed to neutralise growing calls for theatres, museums, and galleries to distance themselves from climate polluters.
onDec 16, 2025 @ 12:11 PST

New data show American capital now controls most of Canadaโ€™s oil and gas sector while jobs vanish, royalties lag, and billions flow south.

New data show American capital now controls most of Canadaโ€™s oil and gas sector while jobs vanish, royalties lag, and billions flow south.
onDec 16, 2025 @ 03:07 PST

Salmon wagons and boat trips for schoolkids distract from environmental damage, say campaigners.

Salmon wagons and boat trips for schoolkids distract from environmental damage, say campaigners.
onDec 15, 2025 @ 13:16 PST

Emails obtained by DeSmog show county officials continually met privately with Project Sail lobbyists, something denied to local residents opposing the $17 billion data center.

Emails obtained by DeSmog show county officials continually met privately with Project Sail lobbyists, something denied to local residents opposing the $17 billion data center.