Dr. S. Fred Singer's Reputation: Falling from a High Perch

authordefault
on

In light of his having threatened to sue us, we have been poking around (and accepting help in that regard from clever readers) and have come up with two more comments on Dr. S. Fred Singer.

First, and much in his favour, we have his own CV, which distinguishes Dr. Singer as a scientist of significant accomplishment, although given his current role as an anti-government lobbyist, he must be a little embarrassed about having spent two stints on the taxpayer’s tab (once under Nixon, and once under Reagan/Bush).

Second, if he follows through and sues, we presume that he will argue that we have damaged his reputation, which is strange, given that this and this are examples of how his reputation has been characterized in the past.

Looks bad, Fred.

Related Posts

on

The conference has played host to Nigel Farage, Kemi Badenoch, and an array of MAGA figures this week.

The conference has played host to Nigel Farage, Kemi Badenoch, and an array of MAGA figures this week.
on

Chris Wright, a former oil and gas executive, urged the UK to embrace fossil fuels at right-wing Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference in London.

Chris Wright, a former oil and gas executive, urged the UK to embrace fossil fuels at right-wing Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference in London.
on

The addition of the Canadian Natural Resources Limited director expands fossil fuel representation on the board overseeing nearly $800 billion in retirement savings, as CPPIB faces scrutiny over its climate strategy.

The addition of the Canadian Natural Resources Limited director expands fossil fuel representation on the board overseeing nearly $800 billion in retirement savings, as CPPIB faces scrutiny over its climate strategy.
on

Many Cannes Lions award winners have claimed credit for field work they didnโ€™t do, positive impacts that canโ€™t be confirmed, or campaigns that barely existed.

Many Cannes Lions award winners have claimed credit for field work they didnโ€™t do, positive impacts that canโ€™t be confirmed, or campaigns that barely existed.