Scientists Publicly Denounce Latest White House Climate Change Muzzling

on

Today, scientists are publicly denouncing the White House for the “censoring of science,” after it was uncovered earlier this week that significant edits were made to testimony prepared for a Senate hearing on the impact of climate change on health.

White House officials deleted key portions citing diseases that could flourish in a warmer climate.

“Dr. Gerberding is the lead of the premiere public health agency in the U.S.,” said Kim Knowlton, a science fellow on global warming and health at the National Resources Defense Council in New York. “It’s shocking that she was not allowed to say in a public discussion some of these vital details.

“One has to wonder why was this is so threatening to the White House.”

All this, sadly, is not a surprising news item. When it comes to the science of climate change, the Bush Administration has a long history of “selective interpretation.”

Here’s some links to a few examples:

Former White House Official Doctored Global Warming Reports to Undercut Scientific Findings

White House Environmental Chief Launches Stealth Attack on Climate Science

Yet Another Case of Bush Administration Science Suppression

Bush Administration Comes Unravelled over the Climate Change Issue

George W Bush’s Global Warming Policy History

EPA Decision Repudiates White House Position

NASA Administrator the White House Denier-of-the-Day

DeSmogBlog is a registered non-profit, and we count on reader’s donations to help us do what we do. So donate today, $10, $25, heck even $5,000 and help us keep hosting great US science writers like Chris Mooney, author of The Republican War on Science and Stormworld and award-winning writers like Bill McKibben and Ross Gelbspan.  

Related Posts

on
The American Conservation Coalition is partnering with AI and gas firms to support data centers and backing reforms that could fast-track their approvals.
on
While Canada Action claims to be funded by ordinary Canadians, donations only made up 0.5% of its revenue in 2024.
on
Some MPs say the arrangement — which gives Turkish Petroleum 95 percent of revenues on estimated 20 billion barrels of oil — is "illegitimate".
on
Civil society left ‘flying blind’ in the face of large turnout from pharma, oil, and mining groups.